Efficacies of different external controls for excessive foot pronation: A meta-analysis

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 743-751

  Cheung, Roy T H ^a   Chung, Raymond C K ^a   Ng, Gabriel Y F ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATHLETIC TAPE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CALCANEUS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); FOOT DISEASE; GAIT; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; ORTHOTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SHOE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ATHLETIC TAPE; BIOMECHANICS; CALCANEUS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FOOT DISEASES; GAIT; HUMANS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PRONATION; SHOES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959456048     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: 14730480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079780     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, et al. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex - Part 2: pronation and supination. Foot Ankle 1989; 9 : 248 - 53. (Pubitemid 19129212)
2. Lafortune M A, Cavanagh PR, Sommer HJ 3rd, et al. Foot inversion-eversion and knee kinematics during walking. J Orthop Res 1994; 12 : 412 - 20. (Pubitemid 24181145)
3. Cheung RT, Ng GY. influence of different footwear on force of landing during running. Phys Ther 2008; 88 : 620 - 8. (Pubitemid 351620013)
4. Mizrahi J, Verbitsky O, Isakov E. Fatigue-related loading imbalance on the shank in running: a possible factor in stress fractures. Ann Biomed Eng 2000; 28 : 463 - 9.
5. Wall J, Feller JF. Imaging of stress fractures in runners. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25 : 781 - 802. (Pubitemid 44311289)
6. Weist R, Eils E, Rosenbaum D. The influence of muscle fatigue on electromyogram and plantar pressure patterns as an explanation for the incidence of metatarsal stress fractures. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 : 1893 - 8. (Pubitemid 39551869)
7. Pascual Huerta J, García JM, Matamoros EC, et al. Relationship of body mass index, ankle dorsiflexion, and foot pronation on plantar fascia thickness in healthy, asymptomatic subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2008; 98 : 379 - 85.
8. Cook SD, Brinker MR, Poche M. Running shoes. Their relationship to running injuries. Sports Med 1990; 10 : 1 - 8. (Pubitemid 20319938)
9. van Gheluwe B, Tielemans R, Roosen P. The influence of heel counter rigidity on rearfoot motion during running. J App Biomech 1995; 11 :47-67.
10. Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: a theoretical model. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 9 : 160 - 5.
11. Moen MH, Tol JL, Weir A, et al. Medial tibial stress syndrome: a critical review. Sports Med 2009; 39 : 523 - 46.
12. Willems T M, De Clercq D, Delbaere K, et al. A prospective study of gait related risk factors for exercise-related lower leg pain. Gait Posture 2006; 23 : 91 - 8. (Pubitemid 41718928)
13. Cheung RTH, Ng GYF. A systematic review of running shoes and lower leg biomechanics: a possible link with patellofemoral pain syndrome? Int Sport Med J 2007; 8 :107-16.
14. Cheung RT, Ng GY, Chen BF. Association of footwear with patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners. Sports Med 2006; 36 : 199 - 205.
15. Boling MC, Padua DA, Marshall SW, et al. A prospective investigation of biomechanical risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome: the Joint Undertaking to Monitor and Prevent ACL Injury (JUMP-ACL) cohort. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 : 2108 - 16.
16. Genaze RR. Pronation. The orthotist's view. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2000; 17 : 481 - 503, vii.
17. Cheung RTH, Ng GYF. Efficacy of motion control footwears for reducing excessive rearfoot motion in fatigued runners. Phys Ther Sports 2007; 8 :75-81. (Pubitemid 46488867)
18. Yamashita MH. Evaluation and selection of shoe wear and orthoses for the runner. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2005; 16 : 801 - 29. (Pubitemid 40943593)
19. Franettovich M, Chapman A, Blanch P, et al. A physiological and psychological basis for anti-pronation taping from a critical review of the literature. Sports Med 2008; 38 : 617 - 31. (Pubitemid 351989050)
20. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83 : 713 - 21. (Pubitemid 37238882)
21. Sherrington C, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, et al. T en years of evidence to guide physiotherapy interventions: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Br J Sports Med 2010; 44 : 836 - 7.
22. Huedo-Medina T B, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F, et al. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods 2006; 11 : 193 - 206. (Pubitemid 44001277)
23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315 : 629 - 34. (Pubitemid 27387172)
24. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, et al. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000; 15 : 54 - 64.
25. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, et al. Effects of shoe sole construction on skeletal motion during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 : 311 - 19. (Pubitemid 32142999)
26. Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, et al. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 1997; 30 : 729 - 32. (Pubitemid 27309823)
27. Dye RW. A strapping. J Natl Assoc Chirop 1939; 29 :11-12.
28. Bates B T, Osternig LR, Mason B, et al. Foot orthotic devices to modify selected aspects of lower extremity mechanics. Am J Sports Med 1979; 7 : 338 - 42.
29. Brown GP, Donatelli R, Catlin PA, et al. The effect of two types of foot orthoses on rearfoot mechanics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995; 21 : 258 - 67.
30. Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. The effect of soft foot orthotics on three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics during walking and running. Phys Ther 1994; 74 : 836 - 44. (Pubitemid 24288619)
31. Eslami M, Begon M, Hinse S, et al. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12 : 679 - 84.
32. Johanson M A, Donatelli R, Wooden MJ, et al. Effects of three different posting methods on controlling abnormal subtalar pronation. Phys Ther 1994; 74 : 149 - 58.
33. MacLean C, Davis IM, Hamill J. influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006; 21 : 623 - 30. (Pubitemid 43816747)
34. McCulloch M U, Brunt D, Vander Linden D. The effect of foot orthotics and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 17 : 2 - 10. (Pubitemid 23035242)
35. Moss CL, Gorton B, Deters S. A comparison of prescribed rigid orthotic devices and athletic taping support used to modify pronation in runners. J Sport Rehabil 1993; 2 :179-88. (Pubitemid 23236042)
36. Mündermann A, Nigg BM, Humble RN, et al. Foot orthotics affect lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18 : 254 - 62. (Pubitemid 36298631)
37. Novick A, Kelley DL. Position and Movement Changes of the Foot with Orthotic Intervention during the Loading Response of Gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 11 : 301 - 12. (Pubitemid 20059275)
38. Rodgers MM, Leveau BF. Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners*. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1982; 4 : 86 - 90. (Pubitemid 13210143)
39. Smith LS, Clarke TE, Hamill CL, et al. The effects of soft and semi-rigid orthoses upon rearfoot movement in running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1986; 76 : 227 - 33.
40. Butler RJ, Davis IS, Hamill J. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 : 1998 - 2005. (Pubitemid 44704256)
41. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15 : 376 - 81. (Pubitemid 14239232)
42. Hamill J, Freedson PS, Boda W, et al. Effects of shoe type on cardiorespiratory responses and rearfoot motion during treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 : 515 - 21. (Pubitemid 18266136)
43. Kersting UG, Brüggemann GP. Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running. R es Sports Med 2006; 14 : 1 - 17.
44. Milani TL, Schnabel G, Hennig EM. Rearfoot motion and pressure distribution patterns during running in shoes with varus and valgus wedges. J App Biomech 1995; 11 :177-87.
45. Nigg BM, Morlock M. The influence of lateral heel flare of running shoes on pronation and impact forces. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19 : 294 - 302. (Pubitemid 17110086)
46. Harradine P, Herrington L, Wright R. The effect of low dye taping upon rearfoot motion and position before and after exercise. Foot 2001; 11 :57-60. (Pubitemid 32737474)
47. Jamali B, Walker M, Hoke B, et al. Windlass taping technique for symptomatic relief of plantar fasciitis. J Sport Rehabil 2004; 13 :228-43. (Pubitemid 39572121)
48. Keenan A M, Tanner CM. The effect of high-Dye and low-Dye taping on rearfoot motion. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91 : 255 - 61. (Pubitemid 33721595)
49. Kersting U G, Kriwet A, Brüggemann GP. The role of footwear-independent variations in rearfoot movement on impact attenuation in heel-toe running. Res Sports Med 2006; 14 : 117 - 34. (Pubitemid 43880165)
50. O'Sullivan K, Kennedy N, O'Neill E, e t al. The effect of low-dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9 : 111.
51. Whitaker JM, Augustus K, Ishii S. Effect of the low-Dye strap on pronationsensitive mechanical attributes of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003; 93 : 118 - 23. (Pubitemid 38469490)