The levels of analysis revisited

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 366, Issue 1574, 2011, Pages 2076-2085

  MacDougall Shackleton, Scott A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Integration; Levels of analysis; Proximate; Ultimate

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RESEARCH WORK; RISK FACTOR; SURVEY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ENVIRONMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; RESEARCH;

EID: 79959428545     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0363     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Bolhuis, J. J. & Macphail, E. M. 2001 A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 426-433. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01753-8)
2. Bolhuis, J. J. 2005 Function and mechanism in neuroecology: looking for clues. Anim. Biol. 55, 457-490. (doi:10.1163/157075605774840987)
3. Francis, R. C. 2004 Why men won't ask for directions: the seductions of sociobiology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Rose, H. & Rose, S. 2000 Alas poor Darwin. London, UK: Jonothan Cape.
5. Baker, J. R. 1938 The evolution of breeding seasons. In Evolution: essays on aspects of evolutionary biology (ed. G. B. DeBeer), pp. 161-177. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
6. Mayr, E. 1961 Cause and effect in biology. Science 134, 1501-1506. (doi:10.1126/science.134.3489.1501)
7. Hogan, J. A. & Bolhuis, J. J. 2008 Tinbergen's four questions and contemporary behavioral biology. In Tinbergen's legacy: function and mechanism in behavioral biology (eds J. J. Bolhuis & S. Verhulst), pp. 25-34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Sherman, P.W. 1988 The levels of analysis. Anim. Behav. 36, 616-619. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80039-3)
9. Tinbergen, N. 1963 On aims and methods in ethology. Z. Tierpsychol. 20, 410-433. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x)
10. Alcock, J. & Sherman, P. 1994 The utility of the proximate-ultimate dichotomy in ethology. Ethology 96, 58-62. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb00881.x)
11. Hogan, J. A. 1994 The concept of cause in the study of behavior. In Causal mechanisms of behavioural development (eds J. A. Hogan & J. J. Bolhuis), pp. 3-15. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fleming, A. S. & Walsh, C. 1994 Neuropsychology of maternal-behavior in the rat: c-fos expression during mother-litter interactions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19, 429-443. (doi:10.1016/0306-4530(94)90030-2)
13. Mello, C. V., Vicario, D. S. & Clayton, D. F. 1992 Song presentation induces gene-expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6818-6822. (doi:10.1073/pnas.89.15.6818)
14. Chew, S. J., Mello, C., Nottebohm, F., Jarvis, E. & Vicario, D. S. 1995 Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require 2 periods of protein-synthesis in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3406-3410. (doi:10.1073/pnas.92.8.3406)
15. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Hulse, S. H. & Ball, G. F. 1998 Neural bases of song preferences in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Neuroreport 9, 3047-3052. (doi:10.1097/00001756-199809140-00024)
16. Eda-Fujiwara, H., Satoh, R., Bolhuis, J. J. & Kimura, T. 2003 Neuronal activation in female budgerigars is localized and related to male song complexity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 149-154. (doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02414.x)
17. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Duffy, D. & Ball, G. F. 2001 Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. J. Neurobiol. 46, 48-58. (doi:10.1002/1097-4695(200101)46:1,48::AID-NEU5.3.0.CO;2-3)
18. Maney, D. L., MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Ball, G. F. & Hahn, T. P. 2003 Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird. J. Comp. Physiol. A-Neuroethol. Sensory Neural Behav. Physiol. 189, 667-674. (doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0441-z)
19. Terpstra, N. J., Bolhuis, J. J., Riebel, K., van der Burg, J. M. M. & den Boer-Visser, A. M. 2006 Localized brain activation specific to auditory memory in a female songbird. J. Comp. Neurol. 494, 784-791. (doi:10.1002/cne.20831)
20. Gobes, S. M. H. & Bolhuis, J. J. 2007 Birdsong memory: a neural dissociation between song recognition and production. Curr. Biol. 17, 789-793. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.059)
21. Gobes, S. M. H., Zandbergen, M. A. & Bolhuis, J. J. 2010 Memory in the making: localized brain activation related to song learning in young songbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3343-3351. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0870)
22. Bolhuis, J. J. & Gahr, M. 2006 Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 347-357. (doi:10.1038/nrn1904)
23. Kruse, A. A., Stripling, R. & Clayton, D. F. 2004 Context-specific habituation of the zenk gene response to song in adult zebra finches. Neurobiol. Learn. Memory 82, 99-108. (doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.001)
24. McKenzie, T. L. B., Hernandez, A. M. & MacDougall- Shackleton, S. A. 2006 Experience with songs in adulthood reduces song-induced gene expression in songbird auditory forebrain. Neurobiol. Learn. Memory 86, 330-335. (doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2006.05.002)
25. Hernandez, A. M. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2004 Effects of early song experience on song preferences and song control and auditory brain regions in female house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). J. Neurobiol. 59, 247-258. (doi:10.1002/neu.10312)
26. Hernandez, A. M., Phillmore, L. S. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2008 Effects of learning on song preferences and Zenk expression in female songbirds. Behav. Process. 77, 278-284. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.001)
27. Dennett, D. C. 1995 Darwin's dangerous idea. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
28. Sherry, D. F. 2004 Asking 'how?' versus asking 'why?'. Cerebrum 6, 89-98.
29. Reeve, H. K. & Sherman, P. W. 1993 Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q. Rev. Biol. 68, 1-32. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1993.tb00731.x)
30. Ryan, M.J. 2005 The evolution of behaviour, and integrating it towards a complete and correct understanding of behavioural biology. Anim. Biol. 55, 419-439. (doi:10. 1163/157075605774841012)
31. McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. 2009 Integrating function and mechanism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 670-675. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.011)
32. Dennett, D. C. 1987 The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. 1979 The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205, 581-598. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086)
34. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & Ball, G. F. 2002 Revising hypotheses does not indicate a flawed approach: reply to Bolhuis and Macphail. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 68-69. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01847-7)
35. Sherry, D. F. 2005 Do ideas about function help in the study of causation? Anim. Biol. 55, 441-456. (doi:10. 1163/157075605774840950)
36. Sherry, D. F. 2006 Neuroecology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 167-197. (doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070324)
37. Penn, D. J. 2002 The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108, 1-21. (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x)
38. Hampton, R. R. & Shettleworth, S. J. 1996 Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 831-835. (doi:10.1037/0735-7044.110.4.831)
39. Sherry, D. F. & Vaccarino, A. L. 1989 Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 308-318. (doi:10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.308)
40. Hamilton, W. D. 1964 The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J. Theoret. Biol. 7, 1-52. (doi:10.1016/0022- 5193(64)90038-4)
41. Fisher, R. A. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
42. Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. E. 1973 Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179, 90-92. (doi:10.1126/science.179.4068.90)
43. Ellegren, H., Gustafsson, L. & Sheldon, B. C. 1996 Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11 723-11 728. (doi:10.1073/pnas.93.21.11723)
44. Correa, S. M., Adkins-Regan, E. & Johnson, P. A. 2005 High progesterone during avian meiosis biases sex ratios toward females. Biol. Lett. 1, 215-218. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0283)
45. Alonso-Alvarez, C. 2006 Manipulation of primary sexratio: an updated review. Avian Poultry Biol. Rev. 17, 1-20. (doi:10.3184/147020606783437930)
46. Riebel, K. 2003 The 'mute' sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv. Study Behav. 33, 49-86. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(03)33002-5)
47. Ikebuchi, M., Futamatsu, M. & Okanoya, K. 2003 Sex differences in song perception in Bengalese finches measured by the cardiac response. Anim. Behav. 65, 123-130. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2012)
48. Searcy, W. A. & Brenowitz, E. A. 1988 Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332, 152-154. (doi:10.1038/332152a0)
49. Nottebohm, F. & Arnold, A. P. 1976 Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of songbird brain. Science 194, 211-213. (doi:10.1126/science.959852)
50. Canady, R. A., Kroodsma, D. E. & Nottebohm, F. 1984 Population differences in complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 6232-6234. (doi:10.1073/pnas.81.19.6232)
51. Brenowitz, E. A., Lent, K. & Kroodsma, D. E. 1995 Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J. Neurosci. 15, 6281-6286.
52. Brenowitz, E.A., Nalls, B., Kroodsma, D. E. & Horning, C. 1994 Female marsh wrens do not provide evidence of anatomical specializations of song nuclei for perception of male song. J. Neurobiol. 25, 197-208. (doi:10.1002/neu.480250210)
53. Fortune, E. S. & Margoliash, D. 1995 Parallel pathways and convergence onto HVc and adjacent neostriatum of adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Comp. Neurol. 360, 413-441. (doi:10.1002/cne.903600305)
54. Vates, G. E., Broome, B. M., Mello, C.V. & Nottebohm, F. 1996 Auditory pathways of caudal telencephalon and their relation to the song system of adult male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata). J. Comp. Neurol. 366, 613-642. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960318)366:4, 613::AID-CNE5.3.0.CO;2-7)
55. Brenowitz, E. A. 1991 Altered perception of speciesspecific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science 251, 303-305. (doi:10.1126/science.1987645)
56. Burt, J. M., Lent, K. L., Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. 2000 Lesions of the anterior forebrain song control pathway infemale canaries affect song perceptionin an operant task. J. Neurobiol. 42, 1-13. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(200001)42:1,1::AID-NEU1.3.0.CO;2-6)
57. Del Negro, C., Gahr, M., Leboucher, G. & Kreutzer, M. 1998 The selectivity of sexual responses to song displays: effects of partial chemical lesion of the HVC in female canaries. Behav. Brain Res. 96, 151-159. (doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00009-6)
58. Leitner, S. & Catchpole, C. K. 2002 Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. J. Neurobiol. 52, 294-301. (doi:10.1002/neu.10085)
59. Lonstein, J. S. & Gammie, S. C. 2002 Sensory, hormonal, and neural control of maternal aggression in laboratory rodents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 869-888. (doi:10. 1016/S0149-7634(02)00087-8)
60. Nelson, R. J. 2005 An introduction to behavioral endocrinology, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
61. Lehrman, D. S. & Brody, P. 1961 Does prolactin induce incubation behavior in the ring dove? J. Endocrinol. 22, 369-375. (doi:10.1677/joe.0.0220269)
62. Gubernick, D. J. & Nelson, R. J. 1989 Prolactin and paternal behavior in the biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Horm. Behav. 23, 203-210. (doi:10.1016/0018-506X(89)90061-5)
63. Beach, F. A. & Holz-Tucker, M. 1949 Effects of different concentrations of androgen upon sexual behavior in castrated male rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 42, 433-453. (doi:10.1037/h0059086)
64. Camazine, B., Gartska, W., Tokarz, R. & Crews, D. 1980 Effects of castration and androgen replacement on male courtship behavior in the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Horm. Behav. 14, 358-372. (doi:10.1016/0018-506X(80)90025-2)
65. Kozmik, Z. 2005 Pax genes in eye development and evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 430-438. (doi:10. 1016/j.gde.2005.05.001)
66. Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. 2009 Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457, 818-823. (doi:10.1038/nature07891)
67. Dawson, A., King, V. M., Bentley, G. E. & Ball, G. F. 2001 Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, 365-380. (doi:10.1177/074873001129002079)
68. Nicholls, T. J., Goldsmith, A. R. & Dawson, A. 1988 Photorefractoriness in birds and comparison with mammals. Physiol. Rev. 68, 133-176.
69. Wiltschko, W. & Wiltschko, R. 1972 Magnetic compass of European robins. Science 176, 62-64. (doi:10.1126/science.176.4030.62)
70. Liedvogel, M. & Mouritsen, H. 2010 Cryptochromes: a potential magnetoreceptor: what do we know and what do we want to know? J. R. Soc. Interface 7, S147-S162. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0411.focus)
71. Parsons, P. A. 1992 Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity 68, 361-364.
72. Møller, A. P. & Swaddle, J. P. 1998 Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73. Swaddle, J. P. 2003 Fluctuating asymmetry, animal behavior, and evolution. Adv. Study Behav. 32, 169-205. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01004-0)
74. Møller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998 Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151, 174-192. (doi:10.1086/286110)
75. Swaddle, J. P. 1999 Limits to length asymmetry detection in starlings: implications for biological signalling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1299-1303. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0778)
76. Swaddle, J. P., Ruff, D. A., Page, L. C., Frame, A. M. & Long, V. A. 2008 A test of receiver perceptual performance: European starlings' ability to detect asymmetry in a naturalistic trait. Anim. Behav. 76, 487-495. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.005)
77. Palmer, A. R. 1994 Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications (ed. T. A. Markow), pp. 335-364. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
78. Brenowitz, E. A. & Arnold, A. P. 1986 Interspecific comparisons of the size of neural song control regions and song complexity in duetting birds: evolutionary implications. J. Neurosci. 6, 2875-2879.
79. DeVoogd, T. J., Houtman, A. M. & Falls, J. B. 1995 White-throated sparrow morphs that differ in song production-rate also differ in the anatomy of some song-related brain-areas. J. Neurobiol. 28, 202-213. (doi:10.1002/neu.480280207)
80. Gahr, M., Sonnenschein, E. & Wickler, W. 1998 Sex difference in the size of the neural song control regions in a dueting songbird with similar song repertoire size of males and females. J. Neurosci. 18, 1124-1131.
81. Jawor, J. M. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2008 Seasonal and sex-related variation in song control nuclei in a species with near-monomorphic song, the northern cardinal. Neurosci. Lett. 443, 169-173. (doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.085)
82. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & Ball, G. F. 1999 Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 22, 432-436. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01434-4)
83. Ball, G. F., Riters, L. V., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & Balthazart, J. 2008 Sex differences in brain and behavior and the neuroendocrine control of the motivation to sing. In The neuroscience of birdsong (eds H. P. Ziegler & P. Marler), pp. 320-331. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Hall, Z. J., MacDougall-Shackleton, S.A., Osorio-Beristain, M. & Murphy, T. G. 2010 Male bias in the song control system despite female bias in song rate in streak-backed orioles (Icterus pustulatus). Brain Behav. Evol. 76, 168-175. (doi:10.1159/000320971)
85. Gahr, M., Metzdorf, R., Schmidl, D. & Wickler, W. 2008 Bi-directional sexual dimorphisms of the song control nucleus HVC in a songbird with unison song. PLoS ONE 3, e3073. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003073)
86. Arnold, A. P. 2004 Sex chromosomes and brain gender. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 701-708. (doi:10.1038/nrn1494)