Psychoprosthetics: An introduction

Psychoprosthetics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-10

  Gallagher, Pamela ^a,b   Desmond, Deirdre ^b,c   MacLachlan, Malcolm ^b,d  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^b Dublin Psychoprosthetics Group   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^d TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959391808     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-980-4_1     Document Type: Editorial

References (27)

1. Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(14-15):831-836.
2. National Limb Loss Information Center Fact Sheet. Amputation Statistics by Cause. Limb loss in the United States. http://www.amputee-coalition.org/fact- sheets/amp-stats-cause.html.
3. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J 2002;95(8):875-883.
4. National Amputee Statistical Database (NASDAB). The Amputee Statistical Database for the United Kingdom 2005/06. Edinburgh: Information Services Division, NHS Scotland, 2007.
5. Ephraim PL, Dillingham TR, Sector M, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(5):747-761.
6. Möller A, Nyman E. Why, what and how?-Questions for psychological research in medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(11):649-654.
7. Darnall BD, Ephraim P, Wegener ST, et al. Depressive symptoms and mental health service utilization among persons with limb loss: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(4):650-658.
8. Fitzpatrick M. The psychologic assessment and psychosocial recovery of the patient with an amputation. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1999;361; 98-107.
9. Pasquina PF, Bryant PR, Huang ME, Roberts TL, Nelson VS, Flood KM. Advances in amputee care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(3 suppl 1):S34-43.
10. Shakespeare T, Watson N. The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? Res Soc Sci Disabil 2001;2:9-28.
11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
12. Peterson DB. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50(2):105-112.
13. Dijkers M P J M, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(S2):S63-S80.
14. Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord 1997;35:829-840.
15. Cardol M, De Jong BA, van Den Bos G A M, Beelen A, De Groot IJM, De Haan RJ. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:27-35.
16. Ephraim PL, MacKenzie EJ, Wegener ST, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Environmental barriers experienced by amputees: The Craig Hospital Inventory of Enviromental Factors-Short Form. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:328-333.
17. Craig Hospital Research Department. Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) manual, version 3.0. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital, 2001.
18. Naidoo P. Potential contributions to disability theorizing and research from positive psychology. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(9):595-602.
19. Gallagher P, Desmond D. Exploring psychoprosthetics. InMotion 2006;16(6):18-20.
20. Murray P. Being in school? Exclusion and the denial of psychological reality. In: Goodley D, Lawthorm R, eds. Disability and Psychology: Critical Introductions and Reflections. Basingstoke Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006:34-41.
21. Heinemann AW. Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50(1):6-14.
22. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(7):506-513.
23. Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O'Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27:191-206.
24. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;2(14):128-146.
25. Wright FV, Hubbard S, Jutai J, Naumann S. The Prosthetic Upper-Extremity Functional Index: development and reliability testing of a new function status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. J Hand Ther 2001;14:91-104.
26. MacLachlan M. Embodiment: Clinical, Critical and Cultural Perspectives. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, y2004.
27. Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(1-3):1-4.