Randomised clinical trial: A 'nudge' strategy to modify endoscopic sedation practice

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 229-234

  Harewood, G C ^a   Clancy, K ^b   Engela, J ^b   Abdulrahim, M ^b   Lohan, K ^b   O'Reilly, C ^b  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PETHIDINE;

ABSENCE OF SIDE EFFECTS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; IRELAND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PREMEDICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYRINGE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

AMBULATORY CARE; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; IRELAND; MALE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959375339     PISSN: 02692813     EISSN: 13652036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04703.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR,. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York, USA: Penguin Group, 2008.
2. Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 317-22.
3. Teague R,. Safety and sedation during endoscopic procedures. Endoscopy Sedation Committee, British Society of Gastroenterology. Available at:.
4. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 2004; 53: 277-83. (Pubitemid 38125519)
5. Harewood GC, Petersen BT, Ott BJ,. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 313-8. (Pubitemid 43972899)
6. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH, Church TR, Allen JI,. Variation in detection of adeonomas and polyups by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastro Hepatol 2009; 7: 1335-40.
7. Singh H, Kadiyala H, Bhagwath G, et al. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastro 2009; 104: 942-52.
8. Rex DK, Khalfan HK,. Sedation and the technical performance of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Clin North Am 2005; 15: 661-72. (Pubitemid 41579051)
9. Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results form a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967-74. (Pubitemid 43725309)
10. Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, Matthews HR,. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions in England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36: 462-7.
11. Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB,. Results from the ASGE/US Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 421-7.