Building interdisciplinary frameworks: The importance of institutions, scale, and politics

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 23, 2011, Pages

  Romero, Claudia ^a   Agrawal, Arun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM; GOVERNMENT; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LETTER; ORGANIZATION; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 79959351101     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104320108     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Díaz S, et al. (2011) Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:895-902.
2. Shackleton S, et al. (2007) Invisible but viable: Recognizing local markets for non-timber forest products. Intern For Rev 9:697-712.
3. Brock WA, Carpenter SR (2007) Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15206-15211. (Pubitemid 47502897)
4. Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2009) Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17667-17670.
5. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419-422.