Middle school students' responses to two-tier tasks

Mathematics Education Research Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 67-76

  Haja, Shajahan ^a   Clarke, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

ADVN; ASSE; BELI; PRSO; SECO

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959317800     PISSN: 10332170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13394-011-0004-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Clarke, D. J. (1996). Assessment. In A. Bishop (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Clarke, D. M. (2003). Changing assessment for changing times. In S. Jaffer & L. Burgess (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th national congress of the association for mathematics education of South Africa, vol. 1 (pp. 1-10). Cape Town: AMESA.
3. Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., & Lovitt, C. J. (1990). Changes in mathematics teaching call for assessment alternatives. In T. Cooney & C. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
4. Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (1995). Assessing the effectiveness of pencil-and-paper tests for school mathematics. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Galtha: MERGA 18: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 184-188). Darwin: University of the Northern Territory.
5. Collis, K. F., & Romberg, T. A. (1992). Collis-Romberg mathematical problem solving profiles [Kit]. Hawthorn: Australian Council of Educational Research.
6. Eley, L., Caygill, R., Crooks, T. (2001). Designing and implementing a study to examine the effects of task format on student achievement. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association conference, Leeds, UK, September 13-15. Retrieved December 12, 2008 from the World Wide Web: http://www. leeds. ac. uk/educol/documents/00001841. htm.
7. Feinberg, L. (1990). Multiple choice and its critics. The college board review, no. 157, Fall.
8. Gay, S., & Thomas, M. (1993). Just because they got it right, does it mean they know it? In N. L. Webb & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Ginsburg, H. P., Lopez, L. S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Yamamoto, T., Willis, M., & Kelly, M. S. (1992). Assessing understanding of arithmetic. In R. Lesh & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 265-289). Washington: AAAS Press.
10. Hart, K. M. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics (pp. 11-16). London: John Murray.
11. Joffe, L. S. (1990). Evaluating assessment: Examining alternatives. In S. Willis (Ed.), Being numerate: What counts? (pp. 138-161). Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
12. Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. K. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 45-90). New York: Academic.
13. Küchemann, D. & Hoyles, C. (2003). The quality of students' explanations on a non-standard geometry item. Retrieved September 19, 2007 from the World Wide Web: http://www. ioe. ac. uk/proof/cerme3. pdf.
14. Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB). (1993). Measuring what counts. A conceptual guide for mathematics assessment. Washington: National Academy Press.
15. Mehrens, W. A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 11(1), 3-9.
16. Panizzon, D., & Pegg, J. (2007). Assessment practices: Empowering mathematics and science teachers in rural secondary schools to enhance student learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 417-436.
17. Rowntree, D. (1991). Assessing students: How shall we know them. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
18. Schwarz, J. L. (1992). The intellectual prices of secrecy in mathematics assessment. In R. Lesh & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 427-437). Washington: AAAS Press.
19. Tamir. P. (1971). An alternative approach to the construction of multiple-choice test items. Journal of Biological Education, 5, 305-307.
20. Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23, 285-292.
21. Tamir, P. (1990). Justifying the selection of answers in multiple-choice items. International Journal of Science Education, 12(5), 563-573.
22. Tobin, K., & Copie, W. (1981). The development and validation of a group test of logical thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(2), 413-424.
23. Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181-204.
24. Treagust, D. F. (1985). Diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, French Lick Springs, Indiana.
25. Treagust. D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science, International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159-169.
26. Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Retrieved September 15, 2007 from the World Wide Web: http://science. uniserve. edu. au/pubs/procs/2006/treagust. pdf.
27. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.