Process optimization for ethanol production from photoperiod-sensitive sorghum: Focus on cellulose conversion

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1212-1218

  Xu, Feng ^a   Theerarattananoon, Karnnalin ^a   Wu, Xiaorong ^a   Pena, Leidy ^a   Shi, Yong Cheng ^b   Staggenborg, Scott ^b   Wang, Donghai ^a  

^a Kansas State University   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Fermentation; Photoperiod sensitive sorghum; Response surface methodology; Sulfuric acid pretreatment

Indexed keywords

ACETATE BUFFERS; ACID CONCENTRATIONS; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; COFERMENTATION; CONSTANT TEMPERATURE; DRY MASS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL YIELD; GLUCOSE YIELDS; INTEGRATED PROCESS; MAXIMUM VALUES; PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE SORGHUM; PRE-TREATMENT; PRETREATMENT TEMPERATURE; RECOVERY YIELD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; SULFURIC ACID PRETREATMENT; WHOLE PROCESS;

CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; OPTIMIZATION; SACCHARIFICATION; SULFUR DETERMINATION; SULFURIC ACID; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

BIOMASS; BREWING INDUSTRY; CELLULOSE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOPERIOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SORGHUM; SULFURIC ACID; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; YEAST;

EID: 79959308452     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bienkowski P., Ladisch M., Narayan R., Tsao G., Eckert R. Correlation of glucose (dextrose) degradation at 90 to 190°C in 0.4 to 20% acid. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1987, 51(1):179-192.
2. Conway E., Downey M. An outer metabolic region of the yeast cell. Biochem. J. 1950, 47(3):347.
3. Fan L., Lee Y., Beardmore D. Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22(1):177-199.
4. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319(5867):1235.
5. Graham R., Nelson R., Sheehan J., Perlack R., Wright L. Current and potential US corn stover supplies. Agron. J. 2007, 99(1):1.
6. Inlow D., McRae J., Ben-Bassat A. Fermentation of corn starch to ethanol with genetically engineered yeast. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1988, 32(2):227-234.
7. Klinke H., Thomsen A., Ahring B. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66(1):10-26.
8. Lin Y., Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 69(6):627-642.
9. Liu Z., Slininger P., Dien B., Berhow M., Kurtzman C., Gorsich S. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 31(8):345-352.
10. Maiorella B., Blanch H.W., Wilke C.R. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25(1):103-121.
11. Mosier N., Ladisch C., Ladisch M. Characterization of acid catalytic domains for cellulose hydrolysis and glucose degradation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79(6):610-618.
12. Paakkari T., Serimaa R. A study of the structure of wood cells by X-ray diffraction. Wood Sci. Technol. 1984, 18(2):79-85.
13. Puri V.P., Pearce G.R. Alkali-explosion pretreatment of straw and bagasse for enzymic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28(4):480-485.
14. Rastogi N., Rashmi K. Optimisation of enzymatic liquefaction of mango pulp by response surface methodology. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1999, 209(1):57-62.
15. Schell D., Farmer J., Newman M., McMillan J. Dilute-sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover in pilot-scale reactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 105(1):69-85.
16. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., Crocker D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass 2004, NREL, Golden, CO.
17. Tilman D., Hill J., Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 2006, 314(5805):1598.
18. Wright J., Wyman C., Grohmann K. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1988, 18(1):75-90.
19. Wu X., Staggenborg S., Propheter J., Rooney W., Yu J., Wang D. Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 31(1):164-170.
20. Xiang Q., Lee Y., Torget R. Kinetics of glucose decomposition during dilute-acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 115(1):1127-1138.
21. Xu F., Shi Y.-C., Wu X., Theerarattananoon K., Staggenborg S., Wang D. Sulfuric acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of photoperiod sensitive sorghum for ethanol production. Bioprocess and Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 34(4):485-492.
22. Zeng M. Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97(2):265.
23. Zhu Y., Lee Y., Elander R. Dilute-acid pretreatment of corn stover using a high-solids percolation reactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 117(2):103-114.
24. Zhu Z., Sathitsuksanoh N., Vinzant T., Schell D., McMillan J., Zhang Y. Comparative study of corn stover pretreated by dilute acid and cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation: enzymatic hydrolysis, supramolecular structure, and substrate accessibility. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103(4):715-724.