Borderline respectable pancreatic tumors: Is there a need for further refinement of this stage?

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 319-324

  Shrikhande, Shailesh V ^a   Arya, Supreeta ^a   Barreto, Savio George ^a,c   Ingle, Sachin ^a   D'Souza, Melroy A ^a   Hawaldar, Rohini ^b   Shukla, Parul J ^a  

^a TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (India)

^b Clinical Research Secretariat   (India)

^c ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic head carcinoma; Pancreatic neoplasms; Resection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BORDERLINE RESECTABLE PANCREATIC TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GASTRODUODENAL ARTERY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS SURGERY; PORTAL VEIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; VASCULAR SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD VESSEL; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; INDIA; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD VESSELS; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959300424     PISSN: 14993872     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60053-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Mohandas KM, Shrikhande SV. Defining the role of surgery for complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 2009;79:33-37.
2. Kuvshinoff BW, Bryer MP. Treatment of respectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Control 2000;7:428-436.
3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic cancer. Available from http://www.nccn.org.
4. Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, Sun CC, Lee JE, Fleming JB, et al. Borderline respectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206: 833-848.
5. Springett GM, Hoffe SE. Borderline respectable pancreatic cancer: on the edge of survival. Cancer Control 2008;15:295-307.
6. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong HQ, Crane CH, Wang H, et al. Borderline respectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1035-1046.
7. Tucker ON, Rela M. Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement. HPB Surg 2008;2008:839503.
8. Barreto G, D'Souza MA, Shukla PJ, Shrikhande SV. The gray zone between postpancreaticoduodenectomy collections and pancreatic fisstula. Pancreas 2008;37:422-425.
9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fstula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.
10. Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393:87-91.
11. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761-768.
12. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20-25.
13. Fuhrman GM, Leach SD, Staley CA, Cusack JC, Charnsangavej C, Cleary KR, et al. Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. Pancreatic Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg 1996;223:154-162.
14. Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, et al. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology 2009;55:277-283.
15. Kato K, Yamada S, Sugimoto H, Kanazumi N, Nomoto S, Takeda S, et al. Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: infuence of resection margin status on survival. Pancreas 2009;38:605-612.
16. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Hiraoka N. Analysis of 5-year survivors after a macroscopic curative pancreatectomy for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2010;34:1908-1915.
17. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unrespectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1439-1443.
18. Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, Talamonti MS, William Traverso L, Linehan DC. Pretreatment assessment of respectable and borderline respectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1727-1733.
19. Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Kulkarni A, Nagarajan G, Fingerhut A. Vascular anomalies encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy: do they influence outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17: 186-193.
20. Talamonti M. Borderline respectable pancreatic cancer: a new classification for an old challenge. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13: 1019-1020.