Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield per plant in rapeseed using AMMI model

Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 174-181

  Marjanović Jeromela, Ana ^a   Nagl, Nevena ^a   Gvozdanović Varga, Jelica ^a   Hristov, Nikola ^a   Kondić Špika, Ankica ^a   Vasić, Mirjana ^a   Marinković, Radovan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FIELD AND VEGETABLE CROPS   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Biplot; Brassica napus; Stability; Yield component

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 79959282322     PISSN: 0100204X     EISSN: 16783921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2011000200009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ALI, N.; JAVIDFAR, F.; ELMIRA, J.Y.; MIRZA, M.Y. Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, v.35, p.167-174, 2003.
2. ANANDAN, A.; SABESAN, T.; ESWARAN, R.; RAJIV, G.; MUTHALAGAN, N.; SURESH R. Appraisal of environmental interaction on quality traits of rice by additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis. Cereal Research Communication, v.37, p.131-140, 2009.
3. ATANASOVA, D.; DOCHEV, V.; TSENOV, N.; TODOROV, I. Influence of genotype and environments on quality of winter wheat varieties in Northern Bulgaria. Agricultural Science and Technology, v.1, p.121-125, 2009.
4. CECARELI, S. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica, v.77, p.205-219, 1994.
5. CHAMPOLIVIER, L.; MERRIEN, A. Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. var. oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy, v.5, p.153-160, 1996.
6. CHAUHAN, J.S.; TYAGI, M.K.; KUMAR, A.; NASHAAT, N.I.; SINGH M.; SINGH, N.B.; JAKHAR, M.L.; WELHAM, S. J. Drought effects on yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plant Breeding, v.126, p.399-402, 2007.
7. FOX, P.N.; CROSSA, J.; RAMAGOSA, I. Multienvironment testing and genotype x environment interaction. In: Kempton, R.A.; Fox, P.N. (Eds.), Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997. p.117-138.
8. CORNELIUS, P.L. Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Science, v.33, p.1186-1193, 1993.
9. GAUCH, H.G. Integrating additive and multiplicative models for analysis of yield trials with assessment of predictive success. Mimeo 857. Soil, Crop and tmospheric Sciences: Cornel University, Ithaca, New York, 1985.
10. GAUCH, H.G. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics, v.44, p.705-715, 1988.
11. GAUCH, H.G. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, New York, 1992. 278p.
12. GAUCH, H.G.; ZOBEL, R.W. Imputing missing yield trial data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, v.79, p.753-761, 1990.
13. GOLLAB, H.F. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, v.33, p.73-155, 1968.
14. GVOZDANOVIĆ-VARGA, J.; VASIĆ, M.; ČERVENSKI, J.; BUGARSKI, D. Genotype and environment effects on yield and quality of winter garlic. Acta Biologica Iugoslavica, Genetika v.36, p.161-170, 2004.
15. HARPER, F.R.; BERKENKAMP, B. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, v.55, p.657-658, 1975.
16. HRISTOV, N.; MLADENOV, N.; DJURIĆ, V.; KONDIĆ-ŠPIKA, A.; MARJANOVIĆ-JEROMELA, A.; ŠIMIĆ, D. Genotype by Environment Interactions in Wheat Quality Breeding Programs in Southeast Europe. Euphytica, v.174, p.315-324, 2010.
17. KANG, M.S. Genotype-environment interaction: Progress and prospects. In: M.S. Kang (Ed.), Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding, CAB International: Wallingford: England, 2002, p.221-243.
18. LIPKOVICH, I.; SMITH, E.P. Biplot and singular value decomposition macros for Excel. Journal of statistical software, v.7, 2002. Available at http://www.jstatsoft.org/v07/i05/paper.
19. MANDEL, J. Non-additivity in two-way analysis of variance. Journal of American Statistical Association, v.56, p.878-888, 1961.
20. MANDEL, J. The partitioning of interaction in analysis of variance. Journal of Research of National Bureau of Standards, Section B. v.73, p.309-328, 1969.
21. MANDEL, J. A new analysis of variance model for nonadditive data. Technometrics, v.13, p.1-8, 1971.
22. th International Rapeseed Congres, 26-30 March 2007, Wuhan, China. Proceedings. 2007, v.I, p.79-81.
23. MARJANOVIĆ-JEROMELA, A. Genetic divergence and variability of seed yield components in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). (in Serbian, with English abstract) 2005, 91p. Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
24. MARJANOVIĆ-JEROMELA, A.; KONDIĆ-ŠPIKA, A.; SAFTIĆ-PANKOVIĆ, D.; MARINKOVIĆ, R.; HRISTOV, N. Phenotypic and molecular evaluation of genetic diversity of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, v.8(19), p. 4835-4844, 2009.
25. MOGHADAM, M.J.; POURDAD, S.S. Genotype x environment interactions and simultaneous selection for high oil yield and stability in rainfed warm areas rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) from Iran. Euphytica, DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0371-8, 2011.
26. ÖZER, H.; ORAL, E.; DOǦRU, Ü. Relationship between yield and yield components on currently improved spring rapeseed cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, v.23, p.603-607, 1999.
27. PIEPHO, H.R. Method for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, v.180, p.193-213, 1998.
28. POPOVIĆ, R.; STOJŠIN, V.; STANTIĆ, M.; KNEŽEVIĆ, M.; STAVLJANIN, B. Economical aspects of rapeseed production in Serbia. (in Serbian, with English abstract), Field and Vegetable Crops Research, v. 47, p.179-185, 2010.
29. SHAFII, B.; MAHLER, K.A.; PRICE, W.J.; AULD, D.L. Genotype x environment interaction effects on winter rapeseed yield and oil content. Crop Science, v.32, p.922-927, 1992.
30. SIDLAUSKAS, G.; BERNOTAS, S. Some factors affecting seed yield of spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agronomy Research, v.1, p.229-243, 2003.
31. SUDARIĆ, A; ŠIMIĆ, D.; VRATARIĆ, M. Characterization of genotype by environment interactions in soybean breeding programmes of southeast Europe. Plant Breeding, v.125, p.191-194, 2006.
32. TODOROVIĆ, J.; LAZIĆ, B.; KOMLJENOVIĆ, I. Crop science - rapeseed, In: Nenadi Ć, N.; Djurovka, M.; Janji Ć, V. (Ed.) Handbook of crop and vegetable growing (in Bosnian). Laktasi: Bosnia and Herzegovina: GrafoMark, 2003, p. 351-356.
33. VARGAS W.; CROSSA, J.; VAN EEUWIJK, F.A.; RAMIREZ, E.; SAYRE, K. Using partial least squares regression, factorial regression and AMMI models for interpreting genotype-by-environment interaction. Crop Science, v.39, p.955-967, 1999.
34. YAN, W.; HUNT, L.A. Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. Plant Breeding Reviews, v.16, p.135-178, 1998.
35. YAN, W. GGE biplot - a windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, v.93, p.1111-1118, 2001.
36. ZOBEL, R.W;. WRIGHT, M.J.; GAUCH, H.G. Statistical analysis of yield trial. Agronomy Journal, v.80, p.388-393, 1988