Agreement and information in the reliability of coding

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 93-112

  Krippendorff, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959281731     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2011.568376     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bennett, E. M., Alpert, R., & Goldstein, A. C. (1954). Communications through limited response questioning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 303-308.
2. Bloch, D. A., & Kraemer, H. C. (1989). 2 × 2 kappa coefficients: Measures of agreement or association. Biometrics, 45, 269-287.
3. Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687-699.
4. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
5. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
6. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
7. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
8. Krippendorff, K. (1978). Reliability of binary attribute data. Biometrics, 34, 142-144.
9. Krippendorff, K. (1993). Computing Krippendorff's alpha reliability. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43/
10. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Krippendorff, K. (2008). Systematic and random disagreement and the reliability of nominal data. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 323-338.
12. Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45, 255-268.
13. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
14. Pearson, K. et al. (1901). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. IX: On the principle of homotyposis and its relation to heredity, to variability of the individual, and to that of race. Part I: Homotyposis in the vegetable kingdom. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, Series A, 197, 285-379.
15. Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
16. Tinsley, H. E. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In H. E. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Academic Press.
17. Zwick, R. (1988). Another look at interrater agreement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 347-387.