Estimating treatment effects on healthcare costs under exogeneity: Is there a 'magic bullet'?

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 1-26

  Basu, Anirban ^a,b   Polsky, Daniel ^c   Manning, Willard G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Average treatment effect; Health care costs; Non linear regression; Propensity score

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATOR; HEALTH CARE COST; KERNEL METHOD; MASTECTOMY; MEDICARE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959258904     PISSN: 13873741     EISSN: 15729400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10742-011-0072-8     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. A Abadie G Imbens 2006 Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects Econometrica 74 235 267 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006. 00655.x (Pubitemid 43417686)
2. J Angrist J Hahn 2004 When to control for covariates? Panel asymptotics for estimates of treatment effects Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 58 72 10.1162/003465304323023679 (Pubitemid 38422766)
3. PC Austin 2008 A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 Stat. Med. 27 2037 2049 18038446 10.1002/sim.3150 (Pubitemid 351772300)
4. H Bang JM Robins 2005 Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models Biometrics 61 962 972 16401269 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377. x (Pubitemid 43906903)
5. Y Bao 2002 Predicting the use of outpatient mental health services, do modeling approaches make a difference? Inquiry 39 168 183 12371570 (Pubitemid 35024562)
6. WE Barlow SH Taplin CK Yoshida DS Buist D Seger M Brown 2001 Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer J. Natl Cancer Inst. 93 447 455 11259470 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7mtFyhsA%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/93.6.447 (Pubitemid 32266537)
7. A Basu PJ Rathouz 2005 Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models Biostatistics 6 93 109 15618530 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh020 (Pubitemid 41240372)
8. Basu, A., Arondekar, B.V., Rathouz, P.: Scale of interest versus scale of estimation: comparing alternative estimators for the incremental costs of a comorbidity. Health Econ. 15(10), 1091-1107 ( 2006) (Pubitemid 44596377)
9. DK Blough CW Madden MC Hornbrook 1999 Modeling risk using generalized linear models J. Health Econ. 18 153 171 10346351 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7osVSluw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00032-0 (Pubitemid 29052479)
10. Box, G. E. P., Cox, D. R.: An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 26, 211-252 (1964)
11. MF Bullano V Willey O Hauch G Wygant AC Spyropoulos L Hoffman 2005 Longitudinal evaluation of health plan costs per venous thromboembolism or bleed event in patients with a prior venous thromboembolism event during hospitalization J. Manag. Care Pharm. 11 663 673 16194130
12. Busso, M., DiNardo, J., McCrary, J.: New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score matching and reweighting estimators. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Paper 3998, (2009)
13. Cox, D.R.: The Planning of Experiments. Wiley, New York (1958)
14. M Crowder 1987 On linear and quadratic estimating functions Biometrika 74 591 597 10.1093/biomet/74.3.591
15. RH Dehajia S Wahba 1999 Casual effects in nonexperimental studies, reevaluating the evaluation of treating programs J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94 1053 1062 10.2307/2669919
16. RH Dehejia 2005 Program evaluation as a decision problem J. Econom. 125 141 173 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.006
17. C Desch L Penberthy B Hillner MK McDonald TJ Smith AL Pozez SM Retchin 1999 A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservation surgery Surgery 125 441 447 10216535 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jt1Wrsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70012-7 (Pubitemid 29166378)
18. N Duan 1983 Smearing estimate, a nonparametric retransformation method J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78 605 610 10.2307/2288126
19. N Duan WG Manning CN Morris JP Newhouse 1983 A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1 115 126 10.2307/1391852
20. WB Ershler K Chen EB Reyes R Dubois 2005 Economic burden of patients with anemia in selected diseases Value Health 8 629 638 16283863 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00058.x (Pubitemid 43110277)
21. Fan, J.: Design-adaptive nonparametric regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 998-1004 (1992)
22. Fan, J.: Local linear regression smoothers and their minimax efficiency. Ann. Stat. 21, 196-216 (1993)
23. Fan, J., Gijbels, I., King, M.: Local likelihood and local partial likelihood in hazard regression. Ann. Stat. 25, 1661-1690 (1997)
24. Fisher, R.A.: Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1935)
25. Frölich, M.: Treatment evaluation: matching versus local polynomial regression. Discussion paper 2000-17, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen (2000)
26. M Frölich 2004 Finite-sample properties of propensity score matching and weighting estimators Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 77 90 10.1162/003465304323023697 (Pubitemid 38422768)
27. C Given C Bradley A Luca B Given JR Osuch 2001 Observation interval for evaluating the costs of surgical interventions for older women with a new diagnosis of breast cancer Med. Care 39 1146 1157 11606869 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrmtV2htw%3D%3D 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00002 (Pubitemid 33603660)
28. J Hadley JM Mitchell J Mandelblatt 1992 Medicare fees and small area variations in the treatment of localized breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 52 334 360
29. J Hadley D Polsky S Mandelblatt JM Mitchell JW Weeks Q Wang YT Hwang 2003 OPTIONS Research Team: an exploratory instrumental variable analysis of the outcomes of localized breast cancer treatments in a medicare population Health Econ. 12 171 186 12605463 10.1002/hec.710 (Pubitemid 36322102)
30. T Hallinen JA Martikainen EJ Soini L Suominen T Aronkyo 2006 Direct costs of warfarin treatment among patients with atrial fibrillation in a Finnish healthcare setting Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 22 683 692 16684429 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283lvF2ntg%3D%3D 10.1185/030079906X100014
31. Hastie, T., Loader, C.: Local regression: automatic kernel carpentry. Stat. Sci. 8(2), 120-143 (1993)
32. JJ Heckman 1990 Varieties of selection bias Am. Econ. Rev. 80 313 318
33. Heckman, J.J.: Randomization and social policy evaluation. In: Manski, C.F., Garfinkel, I. (eds.) Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs, pp. 201-230. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)
34. Heckman, J.J., Robb, R.: Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. In: Heckman, J., Singer, B. (eds.) Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data Econometric Society Monograph No. 10, pp. 156-245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
35. Heckman, J.J., Smith, J.: Evaluating the welfare state. In: Strom, S. (ed.) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, the Ragnar Frisch Centennial Econometric Society Monograph Series, pp. 241-318. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
36. Hirano, K., Imbens, G.W., Ridder G.: Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71, 1161-1189 (2003). Also, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, t0251 (2000)
37. P Holland 1986 Statistics and causal inference J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81 945 970 10.2307/2289064
38. DG Horvitz DJ Thompson 1952 A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47 663 685 10.2307/2280784
39. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S.: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1995)
40. GW Imbens 2004 Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity, a review Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 4 29 10.1162/003465304323023651 (Pubitemid 38422764)
41. GW Imbens JM Wooldridge 2009 Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation J. Econ. Lit. 47 5 86 10.1257/jel.47.1.5
42. J Jalan M Ravallion 2003 Estimating the benefit incidence of an antipoverty program by propensity score matching J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 21 19 30 10.1198/073500102288618720 (Pubitemid 36116517)
43. JDY Kang JL Schafer 2007 Demystifying double robustness, a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data Stat. Sci. 22 523 539 10.1214/07-STS227 with discussion
44. R Killian H Matschinger W Loeffler C Roick MC Angermeyer 2002 A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption of schizophrenia treatment J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 5 21 31 (Pubitemid 36054685)
45. RJ Little DB Rubin 2000 Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes, concepts and analytical approaches Annu. Rev. Public Health 21 121 145 10884949 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhsVCktg%3D%3D 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121 (Pubitemid 30480319)
46. B Lu PR Rosenbaum 2004 Optimal pair matching with two control groups J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 13 422 434 10.1198/1061860043470 (Pubitemid 38845893)
47. JK Lunceford M Davidian 2004 Stratification and weighting via propensity score in estimating of casual treatment effects, a comparative study Stat. Med. 23 2937 2960 15351954 10.1002/sim.1903 (Pubitemid 39200133)
48. WG Manning 1998 The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem J. Health Econ. 17 283 295 10180919 1:STN:280:DyaK1czjvVWltw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3 (Pubitemid 28300217)
49. WG Manning J Mullahy 2001 Estimating log models, to transform or not to transform? J. Health Econ. 20 461 494 11469231 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhvVOksw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8 (Pubitemid 32515166)
50. WG Manning JP Newhouse N Duan EB Keeler A Leibowitz MS Marquis 1987 Health insurance and the demand for medical care, evidence from a randomized experiment Am. Econ. Rev. 77 251 277 10284091 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FgtVGitw%3D%3D
51. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)
52. DL Millimet R Tchernis 2009 On the specification of propensity scores, with applications to the analysis of trade policies J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 27 397 415 10.1198/jbes.2009.06045
53. J Mullahy 1998 Much ado about two, reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health econometrics J. Health Econ. 17 247 281 10180918 1:STN:280:DyaK1czjvVWltg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00030-7 (Pubitemid 28300216)
54. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference: Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 265, 391-396 (1991)
55. Neyman, J.: Sur les applications de la thar des probabilities aux experiences Agaricales: Essay des principle (1923). [English translation of excerpts by D. Dabrowska and T. Speed, in Statistical Sciences 1990; 5:463-472.]
56. J Norum J Olsen E Wist 1997 Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 45 7 14 9285112 1:STN:280:DyaK2svjtFSisQ%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1005804101106 (Pubitemid 27338527)
57. R Oaxaca 1973 Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets Int. Econ. Rev. 14 693 709 10.2307/2525981
58. D Polsky JS Mandelblatt JC Weeksm L Venditti Y-T Hwang HA Glick J Hadley KA Schulman 2003 Economic evaluation of breast cancer treatment, considering the value of patient choice J. Clin. Oncol. 21 1139 1146 12637482 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.126 (Pubitemid 46594145)
59. D Pregibon 1980 Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models Appl. Stat. 29 15 24 10.2307/2346405
60. RE Quandt 1972 A new approach to estimating switching regressions J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67 306 310 10.2307/2284373
61. Quandt, R.E.: The Econometrics of Disequilibrium. Blackwell, Oxford (1988)
62. Rias, L.A.G., Eisner, M.P., Kosary, C.I., Hankey, B.F., Miller, B.F., Clegg, L., Edwards, B.K. (eds.): SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1997. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda (2000)
63. JM Robins A Rotnitzky LP Zhao 1995 Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90 106 121 10.2307/2291134
64. PR Rosenbaum 1987 Model-based direct adjustment J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82 387 394 10.2307/2289440
65. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Propensity score. In: Armitage, P., Colton, T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, vol. 5, pp. 3551-3555. Wiley, New York (1998)
66. PR Rosenbaum 2002 Covariance adjustment in randomized experiments and observational studies Stat. Sci. 17 286 304 10.1214/ss/1042727942
67. PR Rosenbaum D Rubin 1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 41 55 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
68. AD Roy 1951 Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings Oxf. Econ. Pap. 3 135 146
69. D Rubin 1973 The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies Biometrics 29 185 203 10.2307/2529685
70. D Rubin 1974 Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and non-randomized studies J. Educ. Psychol. 66 688 701 10.1037/h0037350
71. D Rubin 1978 Bayesian inference for causal effects, the role of randomization Ann. Stat. 6 34 58 10.1214/aos/1176344064
72. DB Rubin 1997 Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores Ann. Intern. Med. 127 757 763 9382394 1:STN:280: DyaK2svmvVKitQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27446562)
73. DB Rubin N Thomas 1992 Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions Biometrika 79 297 809 10.1093/biomet/79.4.797
74. DB Rubin N Thomas 1996 Matching using estimated propensity scores, relating theory to practice Biometrics 52 249 264 8934595 1:STN:280: DyaK2s%2FovVKrtQ%3D%3D 10.2307/2533160 (Pubitemid 26125107)
75. DB Rubin RP Waterman 2006 Estimating the casual effects of marketing interventions using propensity score methodology Stat. Sci. 21 206 222 10.1214/088342306000000259 (Pubitemid 44367638)
76. Scharfstein, D.O., Rotnitzky, A., Robins, J.M.: Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semiparametric nonresponse models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94, 1096-1120 (with rejoinder, 1135-1146) (1999)
77. B Seifert T Gasser 1996 Finite sample variance of local polynomials: analysis and solutions J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91 267 275 10.2307/2291404 (Pubitemid 126353388)
78. JL Warren M Brown MP Fay N Schussler AL Potosky GF Riley 2002 Costs of treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer in fee-for-service settings J. Clin. Oncol. 20 307 316 11773184 10.1200/JCO.20.1.307 (Pubitemid 34032626)
79. RWM Wedderburn 1974 Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method Biometrika 61 439 447
80. JM Wooldridge 1992 Some alternatives to the Box-Cox regression model Int. Econ. Rev. 33 935 955 10.2307/2527151
81. Z Zhao 2004 Using matching to estimate treatment effects: data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 91 107 10.1162/003465304323023705 (Pubitemid 38422769)
82. Z Zhao 2008 Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications Econ. Lett. 98 309 319 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.05.010