Assistive technology in developing countries: A review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 20-29

  Borg, Johan ^a   Lindström, Anna ^b   Larsson, Stig ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Institute of Assistive Technology   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Developing countries; Low income countries

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; DISABILITY; HEARING AID; LEG PROSTHESIS; PATIENT RIGHT; WHEELCHAIR;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; PATIENT RIGHTS; SELF-HELP DEVICES;

EID: 79959252474     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309364610389351     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
2. UN. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Resolution 61/106. New York: United Nations, 2007.
3. Oderud T, Grann O. Providing assistive devices and rehabilitation services in developing countries. The 5th European conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology, November 1999. Düsseldorf; 1999.
4. Eide AH, van Rooy G and Loeb ME. Living conditions among people with activity limitations in Namibia: a representative national survey. Oslo: SINTEF Unimed, 2003.
5. Nilsson A and Nilsson L. Community-Based Rehabilitation as we have experienced it: voices of persons with disabilities, Part 1. Geneva: WHO & SHIA, 2002.
6. Santos-Zingale MD and McColl MA. Disability and participation in post-conflict situations: the case of Sierra Leone. Disabil Soc 2006; 21(3): 243-257.
7. Dhungana BM. The lives of disabled women in Nepal: vulnerability without support. Disabil Soc 2006; 21(2): 133-146. (Pubitemid 43398944)
8. Tinney MJ, Chiodo A, Haig A and Wiredu E. Medical rehabilitation in Ghana. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(11-12): 921-927. (Pubitemid 46995244)
9. WHO. Assistive devices/technologies. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.
10. WHO. Guidelines for hearing aids and services for developing countries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
11. WHO. Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
12. Borg J and Khasnabis C (eds). Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
13. Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Krizack M, Lindsley A, Wu Y, Reisinger KD, et al. Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries: an overview. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008; 27(2): 12-22. (Pubitemid 351374186)
14. Parker MG and Thorslund M. Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. Gerontologist 2007; 47(2): 150-158. (Pubitemid 47308981)
15. Oderud T. Assistive technology for people with disabilities in Namibia and Zimbabwe: Report STF78 A900525. Oslo: SINTEF, 2000.
16. Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L and Deruyter F. A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007; 2(1): 1-8.
17. Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, Nochajski SM and Wu YWB. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007; 2(4): 235-248.
18. Scherer MJ. Living in the state of stuck: how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. Massachusetts: Brookline Books, 2005.
19. Lindström A. Appropriate technologies for assistive devices in low-income countries. In: Hsu JD, Michael JW and Fisk JR (eds). AAOS Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2008.
20. Saha R, Dey AK, Hatoj M, Podder S. Study of wheelchair operations in rural areas covered under the District Rehabilitation Centre (DRC) scheme. Indian J Disabil Rehabil 1990; Jul-Dec:74-87.
21. Roulstone A. Enabling technology: Disabled people, work and new technology. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.
22. Borg J and Larsson S. The right to assistive technology and its implementation. In: Bhanushali K. (ed.) UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Ahmedabad, India: ICFAI University Press; In press.
23. Staats TB. The rehabilitation of the amputee in the developing world: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20(1): 45-50. (Pubitemid 26147143)
24. Cummings D. Prosthetics in the developing world: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20(1): 51-60. (Pubitemid 26147144)
25. Manigandan C, Bedford E, Kumar S, Peter BK and Premkumar JC. 'MYNI's orthosis': a self-adjustable, dynamic knee extension orthosis for quadriceps weakness in haemophilia rehabilitation. Haemophilia 2004; 10(6): 738-742.
26. Sitek AJ, Yamaguchi GT, Herring DE, Willems CJ, Boninger D and Boninger RM. Development of an inexpensive upper-extremity prosthesis for use in developing countries. J Prosthet Orthot 2004; 16(3): 94-102. (Pubitemid 39090688)
27. Meanley S and Reed NK. An 'appropriate technology' trans-femoral prosthesis, using materials available in Nepal. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998; 22(2): 123-128.
28. Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK and Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123(7): 363-366. (Pubitemid 37236201)
29. Sathishkumar S, Manigandan C, Asha T, Charles J and Poonoose PP. A cost-effective, adjustable, femoral socket, temporary prosthesis for immediate rehabilitation of above-knee amputation. Int J Rehabil Res 2004; 27(1): 71-74.
30. Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Thanh NH, Saldana A and Hartz C. Clinical field testing of polyurethane feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(2): 182-194. (Pubitemid 44446691)
31. Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Zeffer J, Fisk J and Hartz C. Clinical field testing of vulcanized rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(2): 195-212. (Pubitemid 44446692)
32. Jensen JS and Heim S. Preliminary experiences with modified SACH feet manufactured and used in a tropical developing world setting. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23(3): 245-248. (Pubitemid 30007006)
33. Jensen JS and Raab W. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31(1): 10515.
34. Jensen JS and Treichi HB. Mechanical testing of prosthetic feet utilized in low-income countries according to ISO-10328 standard. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31(2): 177206.
35. Sam M, Hansen AH and Childress DS. Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28(2): 132-140. (Pubitemid 39206415)
36. Arya AP, Lees A, Nerula HC and Klenerman L. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 1(1): 37-45.
37. Jensen JS and Heim S. Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24(1): 47-54. (Pubitemid 30255360)
38. Verhoeff TT, Poetsma PA, Gasser L and Tung H. Evaluation of use and durability of polypropylene trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23(3): 249-255. (Pubitemid 30007007)
39. Jensen JS, Craig JG, Mtalo LB and Zelaya CM. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28(3): 230-244. (Pubitemid 40103695)
40. Jensen JS and Raab W. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26(2): 86-92.
41. Jensen JS, Craig JG, Mtalo LB and Zelaya CM. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)- Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28(2): 152-166. (Pubitemid 39206417)
42. Jensen JS and Raab W. Clinical field testing of trans-femoral prosthetic technologies: resin-wood and ICRC-polypropylene. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28(2): 141-151. (Pubitemid 39206416)
43. Jensen JS, Poetsma PA and Thanh NH. Sand-casting technique for trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29(2): 165-175. (Pubitemid 41535596)
44. Thanh NH, Poetsma PA and Jensen JS. Preliminary experiences with the CIR casting system for transtibial prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33(2): 130-134.
45. Wu Y, Casanova H, Smith WK, Edwards M and Childress DS. CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003; 27(2): 146-152. (Pubitemid 37236016)
46. Wu Y, Casanova HR, Reisinger KD, Smith WK and Childress DS. CIR casting system for making transtibial sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33(1): 1-9.
47. Jensen JS, Nilsen R and Zeffer J. Quality benchmark for trans-tibial prostheses in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29(1): 53-58. (Pubitemid 40867701)
48. Jensen JS, Raab W, Fisk J, Hartz C, Saldana A and Harte C. Quality of polypropylene sockets for transtibial prostheses in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(1): 45-59. (Pubitemid 43771904)
49. Reisinger KD, Casanova H, Wu Y and Moorer C. Comparison of á priori alignment techniques for transtibial prostheses in the developing world: pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(11): 863-872. (Pubitemid 46995239)
50. Hansen AH, Meier MR, Sam M, Childress DS and Edwards ML. Prosthetic feet for low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003; 27(2): 8999.
51. Wu Y, Casanova HR and Ikeda AJ. Plastic soda bottles: a reusable material for making transradial sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33(2): 100-106.
52. Matsen SL. A closer look at amputees in Vietnam: a field survey of Vietnamese using prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23(2): 93-101. (Pubitemid 29429648)
53. Bigelow J, Korth M, Jacobs J, Anger N, Riddle M and Gifford J. A picture of amputees and the prosthetic situation in Haiti. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(4): 246-252. (Pubitemid 38325155)
54. Yinusa W and Ugbeye ME. Problems of amputation surgery in a developing country. Int Orthop 2003; 27: 121-124. (Pubitemid 36693283)
55. Lysack JT, Wyss UP, Packer TL, Mulholland SJ and Panchal V. Designing appropriate rehabilitation technology: a mobility device for women with ambulatory disabilities in India. Int J Rehabil Res 1999; 22(1): 1-9. (Pubitemid 29158908)
56. Mulholland SJ, Packer TL, Laschinger SJ, Lysacks JT, Wyss UP and Balaram S. Evaluating a new mobility device: feedback from women with disabilities in India. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22(3): 111-122. (Pubitemid 30135989)
57. Zipfel E, Cooper RA, Pearlman J, Cooper R and McCartney M. New design and development of a manual wheelchair for India. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(11-12): 949-962. (Pubitemid 46995247)
58. Authier EL, Pearlman J, Allegretti AL, Rice I and Cooper RA. A sports wheelchair for low-income countries. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(11-12): 963-967. (Pubitemid 46995248)
59. Armstrong W, Reisinger KD and Smith WK. Evaluation of CIR-Whirlwind wheelchair and service provision in Afghanistan. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(11-12): 935-948. (Pubitemid 46995246)
60. Pearlman J, Cooper R, Chhabra HS and Jefferds A. Design, development and testing of a low-cost electric powered wheelchair for India. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009; 4(1): 42-57.
61. Mulholland SJ, Packer TL, Laschinger SJ, Olney SJ and Panchal V. The mobility needs of women with physical disabilities in India: a functional perspective. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20(5): 168-178. (Pubitemid 28221292)
62. Guimaraes E and Mann WC. Evaluation of pressure and durability of a low-cost wheelchair cushion designed for developing countries. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26(2): 141-143. (Pubitemid 36819939)
63. Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Zipfel E, Cooper R and McCartney M. Towards the development of an effective technology transfer model of wheelchairs to developing countries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006; 1(1): 103-110.
64. May-Teerink T. A survey of rehabilitative services and people coping with physical disabilities in Uganda, East Africa. Int J Rehabil Res 1999; 22(4): 311-316.
65. Shore SL. Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14(12): 71-79.
66. Mukherjee G and Samanta A. Psychological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38(4): 391-399. (Pubitemid 34118843)
67. Mukherjee G and Samanta A. Evaluation of ambulatory performance of arm-propelled three-wheeled chair using heart rate as control index. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22(10): 464-470. (Pubitemid 30487941)
68. Mukherjee G and Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(10): 591-596. (Pubitemid 40852229)
69. Parving A and Christensen B. Clinical trial of a low-cost, solar-powered hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124(4): 416-420. (Pubitemid 38797597)
70. Furuta H and Yoshino T. The present situation of the use of hearing aids in rural areas of Sri Lanka: problems and future prospects. Int J Rehabil Res 1998; 21(1): 103-108. (Pubitemid 28138866)
71. Wirz SL and Lichtig I. The use of non-specialist personnel in providing a service for children disabled by hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20(5): 189-194. (Pubitemid 28221294)
72. Olusanya B. Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation in a developing country. Int J Audiol 2004; 43(10): 563-571. (Pubitemid 40179567)
73. Baltussen R, Abraham VJ, Priya M, Achamma B, Anand J, Gift N, et al. Costs and health effects of screening and delivery of hearing aids in Tamil Nadu, India: an observational study. BMC Public Health 2009; 9(135).
74. Joseph P. A study on certain factors influencing language performance of hearing impaired students. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2003; 14(2): 2018.
75. Francois I, Lambert M-L, Salort C, Bertrand F and Tonglet R. Causes of locomotor disability and need for orthopaedic devices in a heavily mined Taliban-controlled province of Afghanistan: issues and challenges for public health managers. Trop Med Int Health 1998; 3(5): 391-396. (Pubitemid 28232301)
76. Borg J and Larsson S. Assistive devices for people affected by leprosy: underutilised factors of functioning? Lepr Rev 2009; 80(1): 13-21.
77. Shangali HG. Consensus conferences on lower limb orthotics and wheelchair technology. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(1): 1-3.
78. Sheldon S and Jacobs NA (eds). Report of a consensus conference on wheelchairs for developing countries. Bengaluru, India, 6-11 November 2006. Copenhagen: ISPO, 2007.
79. Ramstrand N and Jacobs NA (eds). Report of a consensus conference on appropriate lower limb orthotics for developing countries. Hanoi, Vietnam, 3-8 April 2006. Copenhagen: ISPO, 2007.
80. Meanley S. Different approaches and cultural considerations in third world prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19(3): 176-180.
81. Kim J and Mulholland SJ. Seating/wheelchair technology in the developing world: need for a closer look. Technol Disabil 1999; 11(1-2): 21-27. (Pubitemid 30142448)
82. Olusanya BO, Luxon LM and Wirz SL. Screening for early childhood hearing loss in Nigeria. J Med Screen 2005; 12(3): 115-118. (Pubitemid 41337142)
83. Borg J, Lindström A and Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lancet 2009; 374: 1863-1865.
84. Groce NE and Trani J-F. Millennium Development Goals and people with disabilities. Lancet 2009; 374(9704): 1800-1801.
85. Candel D and Dubois D. Vers une définition de la 'qualité de vie'? (Towards a definition of 'quality of life'?). Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncologie 2005; 1: 18-22. (Pubitemid 41348823)
86. UN. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. A/RES/48/96, 85th plenary meeting. New York: United Nations, 1993.
87. Wu Y, Casanova H, Smith WK, Edwards M and Childress DS. CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003; 27(2): 146-152. (Pubitemid 37236016)