Engineered nanomaterials: Learning from the past, planning for the future

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Kreider, Timothy ^a   Halperin, William ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BIOSURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY;

EID: 79959249058     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: 15365948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b146a     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Trout DB, Schulte PA. Medical surveillance, exposure registries, and epidemiologic research for workers exposed to nanomaterials. Toxicology. 2010;269:128-135.
2. Melius J. Lessons from the asphalt paving industry partnership. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
3. Riediker M. Lessons from NanoImpactNet conference. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
4. Sayre P. Review of new chemicals' nanomaterial submissions under TSCA and experiences to date. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
5. Castranova V. Overview of current toxicological knowledge of engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S14-S17.
6. Erdely A, Liston A, Salmen-Muniz R, et al. Identification of systemic markers from a pulmonary carbon nanotube exposure. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S79-S85.
7. Geraci C. Exposure assessment: current exposure data. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
8. Harthorn B. Characterization of the nanotechnology workforce. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
9. Kuempel ED. Carbon nanotube risk assessment: implications for exposure and medical monitoring. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S90-S96.
10. Li N, Nel AE. Feasibility of biomarker studies for engineered nanoparticles: what can be learned from air pollution research. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S74-S78.
11. Kosnett M. Individual medical monitoring. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
12. Schubauer-Berigan M. Next steps: moving forward in designing epidemiological studies. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
13. Trout D. Population-based surveillance. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
14. Ellenbecker M. Exposure Assessment: Use of Controls and PPE. Nanomaterials and Worker Health. Keystone, CO; 2010.
15. Monteiro-Riviere N. Safety implications of nanoparticles and skin. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
16. Nasterlack M. Role of medical surveillance in risk management. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S18-S21.
17. Markowitz S, Nasterlack M. Point-counterpoint discussion of the question: is there enough information currently to warrant specific medical screening of workers exposed to nanomaterials? Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
18. Schnorr TM, Grajewski BA, Hornung RW, et al. Video display terminals and the risk of spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:727-733.
19. Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Marlow DA, et al. Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:212-218.
20. Kosnett M. A "personal nanomaterial exposure record" for Air Force personnel with potential occupational exposure to nanomaterials. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
21. Bloch D. The French Commission for Atomic and Alternative Energies (CEA) experience of a nanospecific individual exposure sheet. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
22. Marchant G. Problems and issues with exposure registries. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
23. Schulte PA, Trout DB. Nanomaterials and worker health: medical surveillance, exposure registries, and epidemiologic research. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S3-S7.
24. Schulte PA, Mundt DJ, Nasterlack M, Mulloy KB, Mundt KA. Exposure registries: overview and utility for nanomaterials workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S41-S46.
25. Peters A, Rückerl R, Cyrys J. Lessons from air pollution epidemiology for studies of engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S8-S13.
26. Halperin WE, Ratcliffe J, Frazier TM, Wilson L, Becker SP, Schulte PA. Medical screening in the workplace: proposed principles. J Occup Med. 1986;28:547-552. (Pubitemid 16055324)
27. Sng J, Koh D, Yu LE, Gunaratnam S. Current surveillance plan for persons handling nanomaterials in the National University of Singapore. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S25-S27.
28. Lichty P. Example of current surveillance efforts for nanomaterials workers: Department of Energy. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.
29. Gause CB, Layman RM, Small AC. A small business approach to nanomaterial environment, health, and safety. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(6 Supp):S28-S30.
30. Busnaina A. The future of nanotechnology in electronics, energy, and biotechnology. Paper Presented at: Nanomaterials and Worker Health Conference; July 2010. Keystone, CO.