Quantification of Gd-DTPA concentration in neuroimaging using T1 3D MP-RAGE sequence at 3.0 T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 827-834

  Xu, Fangjingwei ^a   Han, Hongbin ^a   Zhang, Hailong ^a,b   Pi, Jincai ^c   Fu, Yu ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^c Department of Ophthalmology   (China)

Author keywords

3D MP RAGE; Concentration quantification; Gd DTPA; Neuroimaging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST METASTASIS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLIP ANGLE; GLIOMA; HEMANGIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; INVERSION TIME; MALE; MENINGIOMA; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELAXATION TIME; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; T1 WEIGHTED THREE DIMENSIONAL MAGNETIZATION PREPARED RAPID ACQUISITION GRADIENT ECHO IMAGING;

EID: 79959232832     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Tokumaru A., O'Uchi T., Eguchi T., Kawamoto S., Kokubo T., Suzuki M., et al. Prominent meningeal enhancement adjacent to meningioma on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images: histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1990, 175(2):431-433.
2. Lee M.C., Cha S., Chang S.M., Nelson S.J. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of radiation effects in normal-appearing brain tissue: changes in the first-pass and recirculation phases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 21(6):683-693.
3. Benjaminsen I.C., Brurberg K.G., Ruud E.B., Rofstad E.K. Assessment of extravascular extracellular space fraction in human melanoma xenografts by DCE-MRI and kinetic modeling. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26(2):160-170.
4. Chen X., Astary G.W., Sepulveda H., Mareci T.H., Sarntinoranont M. Quantitative assessment of macromolecular concentration during direct infusion into an agarose hydrogel phantom using contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26(10):1433-1441.
5. Zhang D., Feng X.Y., Henning T.D., Wen L., Lu W.Y., Pan H., et al. MR imaging of tumor angiogenesis using sterically stabilized Gd-DTPA liposomes targeted to CD105. Eur J Radiol 2009, 70(70):180-189.
6. Tweedle MF, Wedeking P, Telser J, Sotak CH, Chang CA, Kumar K, et al. Dependence of MR signal intensity on Gd tissue concentration over a broad dose range. Magn Reson Med 1991;22(2):191-4, 195-6.
7. Fritz-Hansen T., Rostrup E., Ring P.B., Larsson H.B. Quantification of gadolinium-DTPA concentrations for different inversion times using an IR-turbo flash pulse sequence: a study on optimizing multislice perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 16(8):893-899.
8. Morkenborg J., Pedersen M., Jensen F.T., Stodkilde-Jorgensen H., Djurhuus J.C., Frokiaer J. Quantitative assessment of Gd-DTPA contrast agent from signal enhancement: an in-vitro study. Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 21(6):637-643.
9. Sampson J.H., Raghavan R., Brady M.L., Provenzale J.M., Herndon J.N., Croteau D., et al. Clinical utility of a patient-specific algorithm for simulating intracerebral drug infusions. Neuro Oncol 2007, 9(3):343-353.
10. Fritz-Hansen T., Rostrup E., Larsson H.B., Sondergaard L., Ring P., Henriksen O. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996, 36(2):225-231.
11. Bokacheva L., Rusinek H., Chen Q., Oesingmann N., Prince C., Kaur M., et al. Quantitative determination of Gd-DTPA concentration in T1-weighted MR renography studies. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57(6):1012-1018.
12. Deichmann R., Good C.D., Josephs O., Ashburner J., Turner R. Optimization of 3-D MP-RAGE sequences for structural brain imaging. NeuroImage 2000, 12(1):112-127.
13. Bernstein M.A., King K.F., Zhou X.J. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences 2004, Elsevier, Maryland.
14. Mugler J.R., Epstein F.H., Brookeman J.R. Shaping the signal response during the approach to steady state in three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging using variable flip angles. Magn Reson Med 1992, 28(2):165-185.
15. Firbank M.J., Coulthard A., Harrison R.M., Williams E.D. A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images. Phys Med Biol 1999, 44(12):N261-N264.
16. Lu X., Xu J., Shi Z., Sun B., Gu Z., Liu H., et al. Studies on the relaxivities of novel MRI contrast agents-two water-soluble derivatives of Gd@C82. Chem J Chinese Universities 2004, 25(4):697-700.
17. P C., JJ E., TJ M., RR L. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents, structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev 2000, 99(9):2293-2353.
18. Kawahara M. Advantages and disadvantages of 3T-MRI body applications. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2006, 62(7):938-947.
19. Mugler J.R., Brookeman J.R. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med 1990, 15(1):152-157.
20. Ludemann L., Grieger W., Wurm R., Wust P., Zimmer C. Quantitative measurement of leakage volume and permeability in gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 23(8):833-841.