Endophytic fungi associated with transgenic and non-transgenic cotton

Mycology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 91-97

  de Souza Vieira, Paula Danielle ^a   de Souza Motta, Cristina Maria ^a   Lima, Débora ^a   Torres, Jorge Braz ^b   Quecine, Maria Carolina ^c   Azevedoc, Joǎo Lúcio ^c   de Oliveiraa, Neiva Tinti ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bt cotton; Cry1ac protein; Diversity; Endophyte; Gossypium

Indexed keywords

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; FUNGI; GOSSYPIUM; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; PHOMA DESTRUCTIVA; PHOMOPSIS;

EID: 79959224596     PISSN: 21501203     EISSN: 21501211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2011.584390     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andreote FD, Mendes R, Dini-Andreote F, Rossetto PB, Labate CA, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, van Elsas JD, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL. 2008. Transgenic tobacco revealing altered bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere during early plant development. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 93:415-424.
2. Andreote FD, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL. 2009a. Assessing the diversity of bacterial communities associated with plants. Braz J Microbiol. 40:417-432.
3. Andreote FD, Rossetto PB, Mendes R, Avila LA, Labate CA, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL. 2009b. Bacterial community in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of wild type and transgenic eucalyptus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 25:1065-1073.
4. Araújo WL, Lima AOS, Azevedo JL, Marcon J, et al. 2005. Manual: isolamento de microorganismos endofíticos. Piracicaba(Brazil): Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz".
5. Arnold AE, Mejia LC, Kyllo D, Rojas EI, Maynard Z, Robbins N, Herre EA. 2003. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:15649-15654.
6. Azevedo JL, Araujo WL. 2003. Genetic modified crops: environmental and human health concerns. Mutat Res Rev. 544: 223-233.
7. Azevedo JL, Araújo WL. 2007. Endophytic fungi of tropical plants: diversity and biotechnological aspects. In: Ganguli BN, Deshmukh SK, editors. Fungi: multifacetated microbes. New Delhi (India): Anamaya Publishers. p. 189-207.
8. Azevedo JL, Maccheroni W, Jr., Pereira JO, Araújo WL. 2000. Endophytic microorganisms: a review on insect control and recent advances in tropical plants. Electron J Biotechnol. 3:40-65.
9. Bae H, Kim S, Sicher RC Jr., Kim MS, et al. 2008. The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum, delays the onset of drought stress in Theobroma cacao. Biol Control. 46:24-35.
10. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D. 2000. Yeast: characteristics and identification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Booth C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Surrey (England): Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
12. Bruinsma M, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA. 2003. Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biol Fert Soils. 37:329-337.
13. Button CB. 1980. The Coelomycetes Fungi Imperfect with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. Surrey (England): Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
14. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology. 85:2717-2727.
15. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB [cited 2009 Jun 22]. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira [Internet]. Available from: http:www.conab.gov.br.txt
16. Crickmore N, Ziegler DR, Feitelson J, Schnepf E, van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Dean DH. 1998. Revision of the nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 62:807-813.
17. Devare MH, Jones CM, Thies JE. 2004. Effect of Cry3Bb transgenic corn and tefluthrin on the soil microbial community: biomass, activity, and diversity. J Environ Qual. 33:837-843.
18. Donegan KK, Palm CJ, Fieland VJ, Porteous LA, Ganio LM, Schaller DL, Bucao LQ, Seidler RJ. 1995. Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associate with cotton expressing the Bacillus thurigiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Appl Soil Ecol. 2:111-124.
19. Ellis MB. 1971. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Surrey (England): Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
20. Ellis MB. 1976. More dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Surrey (England): Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
21. Espinosa-Garcia FJ, Longenheim JH. 1990. The leaf fungal endophytic community of a coastal redwood population - diversity and spatial patterns. New Phytol. 116:89-98.
22. Faeth SH. 2002. Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists? Oikos. 98:25-36.
23. Fröhlich J, Hyde KD, Petrini O. 2000. Endophytic fungi associated with palms. Mycol Res. 104:1202-1212.
24. Gridi-Papp IL. 1992. Manual do Produtor de Algodão. São Paulo: Bolsa de Mercadorias & Futuros.
25. Halin RT. 2000. Illustrated genera of ascomycetes. St. Paul (MN): The American Phytopathological Society.
26. Herrera J, Khidir HH, Eudy DM, Porras-Alfaro A, Natving DO, Sinsabaugh RL. 2010. Shifting fungal erndophyte communities colonize Bouteloua gracilis: effect of host tissue and geographical distribution. Mycologia. 102:1012-1026.
27. James C 2009. Brief 41. Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM crops: 2009. Ithaca (NY): ISAAA, ISAAA Brief No. 41.
28. Kinkel L. 1991. Fungal community dynamics. In: Andrews JH, Hirano SS, editors. Microbial ecology of leaves. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag. p. 253-270.
29. Koenning SR, Abdel Alim FF, Grand LF. 2000. Stem canker on cotton caused by Phoma exigua in North Carolina and Virginia. Plant Dis. 84:120-125.
30. Lacaz CS, Porto E, Heins-Vacari EM, Melo NT. 2002. Guia para identificação: Fungos, Actinomicetos e Algas de Interesse Médico. São Paulo: Savier.
31. Lappalainen JH, Koricheva J, Helander ML, Haukioja E. 1999. Densities of endophytic fungi and performance of leafminers (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae) on birch along a pollution gradient. Environ Pollut. 104:99-105.
32. Liu CI, Zou WX, Lu I, Tan RX. 2001. Antifungal activity of Artemisia annua endophyte cultures against phytopathogenic fungi. J Biotech. 88:277-282.
33. Martins ES, Praça LB, Dumas VF, Silva-Werneck JO, Sone EH, Waga IC, Berry C, Monnerat RG. 2007. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates toxic to cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). Biol Control. 40:65-68.
34. Petrini O, Stone J, Carroll FE. 1992. Endophytic fungi in evergreen shrubs in western Oregon: a preliminary study. Can J Bot. 60:789-796.
35. Photita W, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, Hyde KD. 2001. Endophytic fungi of wild banana (Musa acuminata) at Doi Suthep Pui National Park, Thailand. Mycol Res. 105:1508-1514.
36. Ramette A. 2007. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 62:142-160.
37. Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout TG, Rodriguez RJ, Henson JM. 2002. Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science. 298:1581.
38. Rui YK, Yi GX, Zhao J, Wang BM, Li ZH, Zhai ZX, He ZP, Li QX. 2005. Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2:1279-1284.
39. Sánchez-Márquez S, Bills GF, Domínguez-Acuña L, Zabalgogeazcoa I. 2010. Endophytic mycobiota of leaves and roots of the grass Holcus lanatus. Fungal Divers. 41:115-123.
40. Santos RC, Marcellino LH, Monnerat RG, Gander EG. 2003. Mechanical damage in cotton buds caused by the boll weevil. Pesq Agropec Bras. 38:1351-1355.
41. SAS Institute. 1999-2001. SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 8.02, TS Level 2MO. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
42. Saxena D, Stotzky G. 2000. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from roots of transgenic Bt com in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 33:35-39.
43. Schardl CL, Phillips TD. 1997. Protective grass endophytes: Where are they from and where are they going? Plant Dis. 81: 430-438.
44. Selosse MA, Baudoin E, Vandenkoornhuyse P. 2004. Symbiotic microorganisms, a key for ecological success and protection of plants. C R Biologies. 327:639-648.
45. Shelton AM, Sears MK. 2001. The monarch butterfly controversy: scientific interpretations of a phenomenon. Plant J. 27:483-488.
46. Souza JG, Beltrão NEM. 1999. Fisiologia. In: Beltrão NEM, editor. O agronegócio do algodão no Brasil. Brasília: Embrapa Comunicação para Transferência de Tecnologia. p. 87-116.
47. Sticher L, Mauch-Mani B, Metraux JP. 1997. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 35:235-270.
48. Stone JK. 1987. Initiation and development of latent infection by Rhabdocline parkeri on Douglas fir. Can J Bot. 65:2614-2621.
49. Stuart RM, Romão AS, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL. 2010. Culturable endophytic filamentous fungi from leaves of transgenic imidazolinone-tolerant sugarcane and its non-transgenic isolines. Arch Microbiol. 192: 307-313.
50. Taylor JE, Hyde KD, Jones EBG. 1999. Endophytic fungi associated with the temperate palm, Trachycarpus fortunei, within and outside its natural geographic range. New Phytol. 142:335-346.
51. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination, Version 4.5.
52. Torres JB, Ruberson JR. 2008. Interactions of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin in genetically engineered cotton with predatory heteropterans. Trans Res. 17:345-354.
53. Torres JB, Ruberson JR, Whitehouse M 2009. Transgenic cotton for sustainable pest management: a review. In: Lichtfouse E, editor. Organic farming, pest control and remediation of soil pollutants: sustainable agriculture reviews. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 15-54.
54. Wang B, Priest MJ, Davidson A, Brubaker CL, Woods MJ, Burdon JJ. 2007. Fungal endophytes of native Gossypium species in Australia. Mycol Res. 111:347-354.