Commentary: Choosing between qualitative and quantitative approaches

Journal of Research in Nursing

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 185-186

  Carr Hill, Roy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959221267     PISSN: 17449871     EISSN: 1744988X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136140969700200305     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Lewin, K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 1946; 2: 34-46.
2. Rowntree, B. Poverty and Progress: A second social survey of York. London: Longmans, 1941.
3. Popay, J., Rogers, A., Williams, G. Markers for Qualitative Research. (Paper presented in Edinburgh, at the 1996 annual conference of the Medical Sociology Group. To be published in 1997 by the Health Education Authority in its monograph series.).
4. Hammersley, M. What's Wrong with Ethnography. Methodological explorations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1992.
5. Carr-Hill, R. Radicalising survey methodology. Quality and Quantity. The European Journal of Methodology 1984; 18: 275-292.
6. Carr-Hill, R. When is a data set complete: A squirrel with a vacuum cleaner. Social Science and Medicine 1987; 25: 6, 753-764.