Spatial allocation of transportation greenhouse gas emissions at the city scale

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 416-425

  Hillman, Tim ^a   Janson, Bruce ^b   Ramaswami, Anu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b University of Colorado at Denver   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Aircraft; Emissions; Urban areas; Vehicles

Indexed keywords

ALLOCATION METHODS; BOUNDARY EFFECTS; CITY SCALE; CO-LOCATED; LINEAR CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; MASS TRANSIT; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; METROPOLITAN AREA; METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS; PER CAPITA; POLYGON APPROACH; POPULATION RATIO; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; REGIONAL AIRLINES; REGIONAL AIRPORT; SPATIAL ALLOCATION; SPATIAL SCALE; SURFACE TRANSPORT; SURFACE VEHICLES; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS; URBAN AREAS;

AIR QUALITY; EMPLOYMENT; FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; SURFACES; URBAN PLANNING;

AIR TRANSPORTATION;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; METROPOLITAN AREA; TRAFFIC EMISSION; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN AREA;

COLORADO; DENVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959218073     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000136     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Personal stepwise. 2007, Best Foot Forward Ltd. (BFF), (Nov. 1, 2007).
2. 2005 inventory of Seattle greenhouse gas emissions: Community and corporate. 2007, City of Seattle, Office of Sustainability and Environment. (Sep. 4, 2007).
3. Decker E. Elliott S. Smith F. Blake D. Rowland F. Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annual Rev. Energy Environment 2000, 25:685-740. ANEEER, 1056-3466, 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.685.
4. Denstadli J. Impacts of videoconferencing on business travel: The Norwegian experience. J. Air Transp. Manage. 2004, 10(6):371-376. 0969-6997, .
5. Workforce commuting patterns. 2001, Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG), (Jul. 22, 2007).
6. Consumption, price, and expenditure estimates-State energy data system. 2008, Energy Information Administration (EIA), (Jul. 24, 2008).
7. Updating fuel economy estimates in Mobile 6.3. 2002, EPA, (Aug. 4, 2008).
8. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2005. 2007, EPA, (Aug. 24, 2007).
9. Ewing R. Beyond density, mode choice, and single-purpose trips. Transp. Quarterly 1995, 49(4):15-24. TRQUDV, .
10. Highway statistics series: Functional travel system-2005. 2006, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), (Jul. 27, 2008).
11. Frank L. Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: SOV, transit and walking. 1995, and Transportation Research Record 1466, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
12. Golob T. Brownstone D. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. 2005, and Univ. of California Energy Institute.
13. City of Denver climate action plan: Final recommendations to Mayor Hickenlooper. 2007, Greenprint Denver, (Jul. 28, 2007).
14. Heede R. Aspen greenhouse gas emissions 2004. 2006, Climate Mitigation Services (Aug. 12, 2008).
15. Clean air and climate protection software (CACPS). 2003, ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, .
16. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 2006, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan.
17. Kockelman K. Which matters more in mode choice: Income or density?. 1995, Institute of Transportation Engineers 65th Annual Meeting (Sep. 15, 2008).
18. Kuzmyak R. Pratt R. Land use and site design: Traveler response to transport system changes. 2003, and Transit Cooperative Research Program Rep. 95, Chapter 15, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
19. Litman T. Steele R. 2008, and Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
20. Emissions benefits of land use planning strategies. Appendix D-Land use characteristics and travel variable elasticities. 2004, Louis Berger Group, Technical Rep. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Cary, NC.
21. Materials count: The case for material flows analysis. 2004, National Research Council (NRC), Committee on Material Flows Accounting of Natural Resources, Products, and Residuals and Committee on Earth Resources, Washington, DC.
22. Ramaswami A. Greenhouse gas inventory for the city and county of Denver. 2007, (Aug. 21, 2008).
23. Ramaswami A. Hillman T. Janson B. Reiner M. Thomas G. demand-centered hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42(17):6455-6461. ESTHAG, 0013-936X, 10.1021/es702992q.
24. Rodriguez D. Targa F. Aytur S. Transport implications of urban containment policies: study of the largest twenty-five US metropolitan areas. Urban Stud. 2006, 43(10):1879-1897. 0042-0980, 10.1080/00420980600838127.
25. Strait R. Roe S. Bailie A. Lindquist H. Jamison A. DRAFT Colorado greenhouse gas inventory and reference case projections 1990-2020. 2007, and Center for Climate Strategies, Washington, DC.
26. Kyoto protocol. 2006, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), .
27. State and county quickfacts. 2008, U.S. Census Bureau, (Nov. 10, 2008).
28. 2005, U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, (Sep. 17, 2007).
29. Vande Weghe J. Kennedy C. spatial analysis of residential greenhouse gas emissions in the Toronto census metropolitan area. J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11(2):133-144. JINEFZ, 1088-1980, 10.1162/jie.2007.1220.
30. Wolman A. The metabolism of the city. Sci. Am. 1965, 213:178. SCAMAC, 0036-8733, 10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178, .