A simpler model of software readability

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 73-82

  Posnett, Daryl ^a   Hindle, Abram ^a   Devanbu, Premkumar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

entropy; halstead; readability; replication

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT; HALSTEAD; PREDICTIVE MODELS; RATE CODES; READABILITY; REPLICATION; SIZE METRICS; SOURCE CODES;

ENTROPY; MAINTAINABILITY;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 79959214437     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1985441.1985454     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. The Zen of Python. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/. [Online; accessed 31-January-2011].
2. K. Aggarwal, Y. Singh, and J. Chhabra. An integrated measure of software maintainability. In Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2002. Proceedings. Annual, pages 235-241. IEEE, 2002.
3. R. M. Baecker and A. Marcus. Human factors and typography for more readable programs. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
4. J. Börstler, M. Caspersen, and M. Nordström. Beauty and the Beast: Toward a Measurement Framework for Example Program Quality. Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, 2008.
5. L. Briand and J. Wüst. Empirical studies of quality models in object-oriented systems. Advances in Computers, 56:97-166, 2002.
6. R. Buse and W. Weimer. Learning a Metric for Code Readability. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 36(4):546-558, 2010.
7. S. Butler, M. Wermelinger, Y. Yu, and H. Sharp. Relating Identifier Naming Flaws and Code Quality: An Empirical Study. In 2009 16th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 31-35. IEEE, 2009.
8. S. Butler, M. Wermelinger, Y. Yu, and H. Sharp. Exploring the influence of identifier names on code quality: An empirical study. In 14th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, March 2010. Pages 159-168.
9. J. Cohen. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
10. D. Coleman, D. Ash, B. Lowther, and P. Oman. Using metrics to evaluate software system maintainability. Computer, 27(8):44-49, 2002.
11. N. Coulter. Software science and cognitive psychology. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, pages 166-171, 1983.
12. S. Dahiya, J. Chhabra, and S. Kumar. Use of genetic algorithm for software maintainability metrics' conditioning. In Advanced Computing and Communications, 2007. ADCOM 2007. International Conference on, pages 87-92. IEEE, 2008.
13. F. Détienne and F. Bott. Software design-cognitive aspects. Springer Verlag, 2002.
14. K. El Emam, S. Benlarbi, N. Goel, and S. Rai. The confounding effect of class size on the validity of object-oriented metrics. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 27(7):630-650, 2002.
15. J. Elshoff and M. Marcotty. Improving computer program readability to aid modification. Communications of the ACM, 25(8):512-521, 1982. (Pubitemid 12569199)
16. L. Etzkorn, S. Gholston, and W. Hughes Jr. A semantic entropy metric. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 14(4):293-310, 2002.
17. R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. Journal of applied psychology, 32(3):221-233, 1948.
18. R. Forax. Why extension methods are evil. http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ forax/archive/2009/11/-28/why-extension-methods-are-evil. [Online; accessed 31-January-2011].
19. B. Guzel. Top 15 best practices for writing super readable code. http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/top-15-best-practices-for- writing-super-readable-code/. [Online; accessed 31-January-2011].
20. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. Witten. The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1):10-18, 2009.
21. M. Halstead. Elements of software science. Elsevier New York, 1977.
22. A. Hindle, M. Godfrey, and R. Holt. Reading beside the lines: Indentation as a proxy for complexity metric. In Program Comprehension, 2008. ICPC 2008. The 16th IEEE International Conference on, pages 133-142. IEEE, 2008.
23. M. Kanat-Alexander. Readability and naming things. http://www. codesimplicity.com/post/readability-and-naming-things/. [Online; accessed 31-January-2011].
24. J. Kearney, R. Sedlmeyer, W. Thompson, M. Gray, and M. Adler. Software complexity measurement. Communications of the ACM, 29(11):1044-1050, 1986.
25. D. Kozlov, J. Koskinen, M. Sakkinen, and J. Markkula. Assessing maintainability change over multiple software releases. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 20(1):31-58, 2008. (Pubitemid 351321941)
26. J. Kumar Chhabra, K. Aggarwal, and Y. Singh. Code and data spatial complexity: two important software understandability measures. Information and software Technology, 45(8):539-546, 2003.
27. S. Lessmann, B. Baesens, C. Mues, and S. Pietsch. Benchmarking classification models for software defect prediction: A proposed framework and novel findings. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 34(4):485, 2008.
28. J. Lin and K. Wu. A Model for Measuring Software Understandability. In Computer and Information Technology, 2006. CIT'06. The Sixth IEEE International Conference on, page 192. IEEE, 2006.
29. J. Lin and K. Wu. Evaluation of software understandability based on fuzzy matrix. In Fuzzy Systems, 2008. FUZZ-IEEE 2008.(IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). IEEE International Conference on, pages 887-892. IEEE, 2008.
30. A. Mohan, N. Gold, and P. Layzell. An initial approach to assessing program comprehensibility using spatial complexity, number of concepts and typographical style. In Reverse Engineering, 2004. Proceedings. 11th Working Conference on, pages 246-255. IEEE, 2005.
31. N. Naeem, M. Batchelder, and L. Hendren. Metrics for measuring the effectiveness of decompilers and obfuscators. In Program Comprehension, 2007. ICPC'07. 15th IEEE International Conference on, pages 253-258. IEEE, 2007.
32. P. Peduzzi, J. Concato, E. Kemper, T. Holford, and A. Feinstein. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis* 1. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 49(12):1373-1379, 1996. (Pubitemid 27028925)
33. D. Raymond. Reading source code. In Proceedings of the 1991 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, pages 3-16. IBM Press, 1991.
34. P. Relf. Tool assisted identifier naming for improved software readability: an empirical study. In Empirical Software Engineering, 2005. 2005 International Symposium on, page 10. IEEE, 2005.