Sq effect on the electromagnetic response functions in the period range between 104 and 105 s

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 186, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 193-206

  Shimizu, Hisayoshi ^a,c   Yoneda, Asami ^a   Baba, Kiyoshi ^a   Utada, Hisashi ^a   Palshin, Nikolay A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b SHIRSHOV INSTITUTE OF OCEANOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c Tokyo Shoseki Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electrical properties; Geomagnetic induction

Indexed keywords

BACKGROUND SPECTRA; COMMON FEATURES; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC RESPONSE; FINITE WAVELENGTH; FORWARD MODELLING; GEOMAGNETIC DEPTH SOUNDINGS; GEOMAGNETIC INDUCTION; GEOMAGNETIC TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; HIGHER HARMONICS; IMAGINARY PARTS; INDUCTION VECTORS; LINE SPECTRA; MAGNETIC FIELD VARIATIONS; PLANE WAVE; RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; SOURCE EFFECTS;

ELASTIC WAVES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC FIELDS;

HARMONIC FUNCTIONS;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; MANTLE STRUCTURE; SPHERE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WAVELENGTH;

EID: 79959210884     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05036.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baba, K., Tarits, P., Chave, A.D., Evans, R.L., Hirth, G. & Mackie, R.L., 2006. Electrical structure beneath the northern MELT line on the East Pacific Rise at 15 degrees 45'S, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L22301, doi:.
2. Baba, K., Utada, H., Goto, T., Kasaya, T., Shimizu, H. & Tada, N., 2010. Electrical conductivity imaging of the Philippine Seaupper mantle using seafloor magnetotelluric data, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 183, 44-62, doi:.
3. Bahr, K. & Filloux, J.H., 1989. Local Sq response functions from EMSLAB data, J. geophys. Res., 94(B10), 14195-14200.
4. Banks, R. J., 1969. Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 17, 457-487.
5. Banks, R.J. & Ainsworth, J.N., 1992. Global and spatial structure of mid-latitude geomagnetic variations, Geophys. J. Int., 110, 251-266.
6. Berdichevsky, M.N., 1999. Marginal notes on magnetotellurics, Surv. Geophys., 20, 341-375.
7. Boteler, D.H., 1990. Electromagnetic induction in the Earth due to stationary and moving sources, Pure appl. Geophys., 134, 511-526.
8. Chave, A.D. & Thomson, D.J., 2004. Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 988-1006.
9. Constable, S. & Heinson, G., 2004. Hawaiian hot-spot swell structure from seafloor MT sounding, Tectonophysics, 389, 111-124.
10. Egbert, G.D. & Booker, J.R., 1989. Multivariate analysis of geomagnetic array data. 1. The response space, J. geophys. Res., 94(B10), 14227-14247.
11. Everett, M.E., 2006. Local time stacking of geomagnetic solar daily variations, J. geophys. Res., 111, B03103, doi:.
12. Fujii, I. & Schultz, A., 2002. The 3D electromagnetic response of the Earth to ring current and auroral oval excitation, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 689-709.
13. Koyama, T., Shimizu, H. & Utada, H., 2002. Possible effects of lateral heterogeneity in the D'' layer on electromagnetic variations of core origin, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 129, 99-116.
14. Marcuello, A., Queralt, P. & Ledo, J., 2005. Applications of dispersion relations to the geomagnetic transfer function, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 150, 85-91.
15. NOAA, 1988. Data Announcement 88-MGG-02, Digital relief of the surface of the Earth. NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO .
16. Nolasco, M.R., 1998. Sondages electromagnetiques en domaine oceanique appliques en contexte de point chaud intraplaque, PhD thesis, L'Universite deBretagne Occidentale.
17. Nolasco, R., Tarits, P., Filloux, J.H. & Chave, A.D., 1998. Magnetotelluric imaging of the Society Islands hotspot, J. geophys. Res., 103(B12), 30287-30309.
18. Pankratov, O.V., Avdeev, D.B. & Kuvshinov, A.V., 1995. Electromagnetic field scattering in a homogeneous Earth: A solution to the forward problem, Phys. Solid Earth, 31(3), 201-209 (English translation).
19. Rikitake, T., Yokoyama, I. & Sato, S., 1956. Anomaly of the geomagnetic Sq variation in Japan and its relation to the subterranean structure, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 34, 197-234.
20. Schmucker, U., 1970. An introduction to induction anomalies, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 22, 9-33.
21. Schmucker, U., 1999. A spherical harmonic analysis of solar daily variations in the years 1964-1965: response estimates and source fields for global induction-I. Methods, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 439-454.
22. Shimizu, H. & Utada, H., 1999. Ocean hemisphere geomagnetic network: its instrumental design and perspective for long-term geomagnetic observatories in the Pacific, Earth Planets Space, 51, 917-932.
23. Shimizu, H., Koyama, T., Baba, K. & Utada, H., 2010. Revised 1-D mantle electrical conductivity structure beneath the north Pacific, Geophys. J. Int.. 180, 1030-1048.
24. Shiobara, H., Baba, K., Utada, H. & Fukao, Y., 2009. Ocean bottom array probes stagnant slab beneath the Philippine sea, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 90(9), 70-71.
25. Simpson, F. & Bahr, K., 2005. Practical Magnetotellurics, p. 254, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .
26. Singer, B.S., 1995. Method for solution of Maxwell's equations in non-uniform media, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 590-598.
27. Toh, H., Hamano, Y., Ichiki, Y. & Utada, H., 2004. Geomagnetic observatory operates at the seafloor in the Northwest PacificOcean, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 85, 467-473.
28. Weidelt, P., 1972. The inverse problem of geomagnetic induction, Z. Geophysik, 8(2), 257-290.
29. Welch, P.D., 1967. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms, IEEE Trans. Audio and Electroacoust., AU-15, 2, 70-73.
30. Wessel, P. & Smith, W.H.F., 1998. New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 79, 579.
31. Yoneda, A., 2008. On the seafloor topography effect in the ocean bottom electromagnetic response functions, Master's thesis, University of Tokyo (in Japanese).