Publishing ethical research: A step-by-step overview

Journal of Counseling and Development

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 301-307

  Wester, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959200263     PISSN: 07489633     EISSN: 15566676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00093.x     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Abraham, P. (2000). Duplicate and salami publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 46. Retrieved from http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp? 2000/46/2/67/313
2. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.counseling.org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2.aspx
3. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Bersoff, D. M., & Bersoff, D. N. (2008). Ethical perspectives in clinical research. In D. N. Bersoff (Ed.), Ethical conflicts in psychology (pp. 387-389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Bozeman, B., Slade, C., & Hirsch, P. (2009). Understanding bureaucracy in health science ethics: Toward a better institutional review board. Health, Policy and Ethics, 99, 1549-1554.
6. Bruce, V. (2002). Changing research horizons. The Psychologist, 15, 620-622.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). The Tuskegee timeline. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm
8. Coyle, A., & Olsen, C. (2005). Research in therapeutic settings: Ethical considerations. In R. Tribe & J. Morrissey (Eds.), Handbook of professional and ethical practice for psychologists, counsellors, and psychotherapists (pp. 249-262). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203323625-chapter-20
9. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
10. Dell, D. M., Schmidt, L. D., & Meara, N. M. (2006). Applying for approval to conduct research with human participants. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 175-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. DiLalla, D. L., & Dollinger, S. J. (2006). Cleaning up data and running preliminary analysis. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 241-253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Geis, G., & Loftus, E. F. (2010). Taus v. Loftus: Determining the legal ground rules for scholarly inquiry. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9, 147-162. doi:10.1080/15228930802575524
13. Grisso, T. (1996). Voluntary consent to research participation in the institutional context. In B. H. Stanely, J. E. Sieber, & G. B. Melton (Eds.), Research ethics: A psychological approach (pp. 203-224). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2008). Research design in counseling. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
15. Hoit, J. D. (2007). Salami science. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 94. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/013)
16. Mann, T. (2008). Informed consent for psychological research: Do subjects comprehend consent forms and understand their legal rights? In D. N. Bersoff (Ed.), Ethical conflicts in psychology (pp. 412-414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Myors, B. (2006). Statistical power. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 161-171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html#gob3
19. Raju, T. (1994). Republication of research data and meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatrics, 124, 830-831. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81392-7
20. Rosenthal, R. (2008). Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting psychological research. In D. N. Bersoff (Ed.), Ethical conflicts in psychology (pp. 390-397). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Scherbaum, C. A. (2006). A basic guide to statistical research and discovery. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 275-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13, 84-86. doi:10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60374-9
23. Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 53-74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y (Pubitemid 43242428)
24. Tramer, M. R., John, D., & Reynolds, M. (1997). Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: A case study. British Medical Journal, 315, 635-640.
25. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Qualitative validity. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualval.php
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Code of federal regulations: Title 45, Public welfare, Part 46, Protection of human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.108
27. Wester, K. L., Willse, J., & Davis, M. (2010). Psychological climate, stress, and research integrity among research counselor educators: A preliminary study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 50, 39-55.
28. Wolf, L. E. (2009). IRB policies regarding finder's fees and role conflicts in recruiting research participants. Ethics and Human Research, 31, 14-19.
29. Yeh, C. J., & Inman, A. G. (2007). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation in counseling psychology: Strategies for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 369-403. doi:10.1177/0011000006292596