Using an argument ontology to develop pedagogical tool suites

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6680 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 207-214

  Reed, Chris ^a   Wells, Simon ^a   Snaith, Mark ^a   Budzynska, Katarzyna ^a   Lawrence, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument Interchange Format; Argumentation Theory; Dialogue; Ontology

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION THEORY; CLASSROOM ACTIVITY; CRITICAL THINKING; DATA REPRESENTATIONS; DIALOGUE; INTERCHANGE FORMATS; PEDAGOGICAL TOOLS; SOFTWARE SUPPORT;

DATA HANDLING; TEACHING; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; ONTOLOGY;

ONTOLOGY; TEACHING;

EID: 79959198684     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Chesñevar, C., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., Willmott, S.: Towards an argument interchange format. Knowledge Engineering Review 21(4), 293-316 (2006)
2. Harrell, M.: Using argument diagramming software in the classroom. Teaching Philosophy 28(2), 163-177 (2005)
3. Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C.: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
4. Ravenscroft, A.: Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23(6), 453-465 (2007)
5. Reed, C., Rowe, G.W.A.: Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of AI Tools 14(3-4), 961-980 (2004)
6. Reed, C., Wells, S.: Dialogical argument as an interface to complex debates. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(6), 60-65 (2007)
7. Rolf, B., Magnusson, C.: Developing the art of argumentation: A software approach. In: van Eemeren, F.H., Blair, J.A., Willard, C.A., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (eds.) Proceedings of ISSA-2002, pp. 919-926. SicSat (2002)
8. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., Paolucci, M.: Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In: Proc. of the 7th World Conference on AI in Education, pp. 266-273. AACE (1995)
9. Twardy, C.: Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy 27, 95-116 (2004)
10. van Gelder, T.: The rationale for Rationale. Law, Prob. & Risk 6(1-4), 23-42 (2007)
11. Walton, D.: Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. CUP, New York (2006)
12. Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. CUP, New York (2008)