Our Tum? Teaming and the Professional Development of Teachers

Reinventing the Middle School

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 201-217

  Kain, Daniel L ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958853286     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203613542-20     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Arhar, J.M. (1997). The effects of interdisciplinary teaming on teachers and students. In J.L. Irvin (Eds.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 49-56). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
2. Collins, J.e., and Porras, JL. (1994). Built to last: Successfol habits o/visionary companies. New York: Harper Business.
3. Donnellon, A. (1996). Team talk: The power 0/ language in team dynamics. Boston: Harvard Business School.
4. Erb, T.O. (1997). Thirty years of attempting to fathom teaming: Battling potholes and hairpin curves along the way. In T.S. Dickinson and T.O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 19-59). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
5. Felner, R.D., Jackson, A.w., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., and Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528-532, 541-550.
6. Fines, J., and Verrier, R. (1974). The drama o/history: An experiment in co-operative teaching. London: New University Education.
7. Fisher, K (1993). Leading self-directed work teams: A guide to developing new team leadership skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Fisher, K, and Fisher, M.D. (1998). The distributed mind: Achieving high performance through the collective intelligence o/knowledge work teams. New York: AMACOM.
9. Flowers, N., Mertens, S.B., and Mulhall, P.E (1999). The impact of teaming: Five research- based outcomes. Middle SchoolJournal, 31(2),57-60.
10. Goodlad, J.I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Hackman, J.R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work {and those that don't}: Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Hackman, J.R., and Oldham, G.R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Jacobs, H.H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum & assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Johnston, S. (1995). Curriculum decision making at the school level: Is it just a case of teachers learning to act like administrators? Journal 0/ Curriculum and Supervision, 10(2), 136-154.
15. Kain, D.L. (1992). Collaborative planning o/interdisciplinary experiences: A case study at the middle school level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
16. Kain, D.L. (1997). Teacher collaboration on interdisciplinary teams. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly,21(1), 1-29.
17. Kain, D. L. (1998). Teaming in the middle school: A review of recent literature. In P.S. Hlebowitsh and w.G. Wraga (Eds.), Annual review o/research for school leaders 1998 (pp. 51-75). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
18. Kain, D.L. (1999). Organizational wizardry or educational wisdom? John Lounsbury reflects on the middle school movement. Focus on Middle School, 12(1), 1-2, 4-6.
19. Katzenbach, J.R., and Smith, D.K (1993). The wisdom o/teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School.
20. Kliebard, H. (1975). Bureaucracy and curriculum theorizing. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing (pp. 51-69). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
21. Kruse, S., and Louis, KS. (1995). Teacher teaming-Opportunities and dilemmas. Brief to Principals (J 1). Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
22. Marlin, G.J., Rabatin, R.P., and Swan, J.L. (Eds.). (1987). The quotable Chesterton: A topical compilation of the wit, wisdom and satire of G. K Chesterton. Garden City, NY: Image Books.
23. Ostroff, F. (1999). The horizontal organization: What the organization of the future looks like and how it delivers value to customers. New York: Oxford University.
24. Pirsig, R.M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. New York: Bantam. Sizer, T.R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Miffiin.
25. Sizer, T.R. (1996). Horace's hope: What works for the American high school. Boston: Houghton Miffiin.
26. Strahan, D., Bowles, N., Richardson, V, and Hanawald, S. (1997). Research on teaming: Insights from selected studies. In T.S. Dickinson and T.O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 359-384). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
27. Trimble, S.B. (1999, October). Moving beyond the process of teaming to student outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Middle School Association Annual Conference, Orlando, FL.
28. Wasley, P.A. (1994). Stirring the chalkdust: Tales of teachers changing classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Wellins, R.S., Byham, w.c., and Dixon, G.R. (1994). Inside teams: How 20 world-class organizations are winning through teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Wellins, R.S., Byham, w.c., and Wilson, J.M. (1991). Empowered teams: Creating selfdirected work groups that improve quality, productivity, and participation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Wraga, w.G. (1997). Interdisciplinary team teaching: Sampling the literature. In T.S. Dickinson & T.O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 325-343). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.