Acquiring know-how: Research training for practice-led researchers

Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 211-228

  Haseman, Brad ^b   Mafe, Daniel ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958851086     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Corning, P. A. (1998), Complexity is Just a Word!, (cited 19 September 2008), available at: http://www.coniplexsystems.org/comnientaries/jan98.html.
2. Corning, P. A. (2002), 'The re-emergence of "emergence": a venerable concept in search of a theory', Complexity, 7 (6), 18-30.
3. Culler, J. (1992), 'In defence of overinterpretation', in U. Eco, R. Rorty, J. Culler and C. Brooke-Rose, Interpretation and Overinterpretation, ed. S. Collini, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (2005), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Deutscher, M. (1983), Subjecting and Objecting: An Essay in Objectivity, Oxford: Blackwell.
6. George, D. (1989), 'On ambiguity: towards a post-modern performance theory', Theatre Research International, 14 (1), 71.
7. Goldstein, J. (2005), 'Emergence, creativity, and the logic of following and negating', Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10 (3), article 31.
8. Gray, C. (1996), Inquiry through Practice: Developing Appropriate Research Strategies, (cited 18 March 2003), available at: http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/criad/cgpapers/ngnm/ngnm.htm.
9. Law, J. (2004), After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London: Routledge.
10. Mihata, K. (1997), 'The persistence of "emergence"', in R. A. Eve, S. Horsfall and M. E. Lee (eds), Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models and Theories, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 30-8.
11. Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12. Schatzki, T. R. (2001), 'Introduction: practice theory', in T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina and E. von Savigny (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 1-13.
13. Scrivener, S. (2002), The Art Object Does Not Embody a Form of Knowledge, (cited 15 June 2008), available from: http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivenerfull.html.
14. Stacey, R. (1996), Complexity and Creativity in Organizations, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
15. Steier, F. (1991), 'Introduction: research as self-reflexivity, self-reflexivity as social process', in F. Steier (ed.), Research and Reflexivity, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 1-11.
16. Sullivan, G. (2006a), 'Research acts in art practice', Studies in Art Education, 48 (1), 19-35.
17. Sullivan, G. (2006b), Artefacts as Evidence within Changing Contexts, (cited 7 October 2008), available at: http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol4/gsfull.html.