Analysis of systematic engineering design paradigms in industrial practice: Scaled experiments

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 447-465

  Spitas, Christos ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design paradigms; Engineering design; Industrial practice; Intellectual process; Systematic design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PARADIGM; ENGINEERING DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES; INTELLECTUAL PROCESS; SYSTEMATIC DESIGNS;

EXPERIMENTS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; SURVEYS;

DESIGN;

EID: 79958849263     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820903437742     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cross, N., Christiaans, H., and Dorst, K., eds., 1996. Analysing design activity. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons.
2. Davis, P.J., 1963. Interpolation and approximation, NewYork: Blaisdell, 1963.
3. Dickson, K., 1990. The role of design in the innovation process. Journal of Engineering Design, 1 (3), 269-278.
4. Dorst, K., 1995. Analysing design activity: new directions in protocol analysis. Design Studies, 16 (2), 139-142.
5. Dorta, T., 2008. The ideation gap: hybrid tools, design flow and practice. Design Studies, 29 (2), 121-141.
6. Eder, W.E., 1998. Design modelling - a design science approach (and why does industry not use it?). Journal of Engineering Design, 9 (4), 355-371.
7. Fawcett, W., 1987. A note on the logic of design. Design Studies, 8 (2), 82-87.
8. Fischbein, E., 1987. Intuition and experience. In: Intuition in science and mathematics: an educational approach. NewYork: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 85-96.
9. Korn, J., 1996. Domain-independent design theory. Journal of Engineering Design, 7 (3), 293-311.
10. Locke, J., 1706. An essay concerning human understanding. 5th ed. London: A. & J. Churchill and S. Manship.
11. Maimon, O. and Braha, D., 1999.A mathematical theory of design: representation of design artifacts (part I). International Journal of General Systems, 27 (4), 275-318.
12. Mattheus, B., 2007. Locating design phenomena: a methodological excursion. Design Studies, 28 (4), 369-385.
13. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 1988. Engineering design: a systematic approach. London: The Design Council.
14. Pedgley, O., 2007. Capturing and analysing own design activity. Design Studies, 28 (5), 463-483.
15. Schön, D.A., 1983. The reflective practitioner. NewYork: Harper Collins.
16. Simon, H.A., 1999. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Spitas, C., 2010. Analysis of systematic engineering design paradigms in industrial practice: A survey. Journal of Engineering Design. doi: 10.1080/09544820903437734. Available online.
18. Vajna, S., et al., 2005. The autogenetic design theory: an evolutionary view of the design process. Journal of Engineering Design, 16 (4), 423-440.
19. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 1993. Richtlinie VDI 2221: Methodik zum Entwickeln und Konstruieren technischer Systeme und Produkte. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag.
20. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 1998. VDI-Richtlinie 2225: Technisch-wirtschaftliche Bewertung. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag.
21. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 1999. VDI-Richtlinie 2222: Konstruktionsmethodik. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag.
22. Visser, W., 2009. Design: one, but in different forms. Design Studies, 30 (3), 187-223.
23. Visser, W., 2006. The cognitive artefacts of designing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.