Production flow control in the automotive industry - Quick scan approach

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 49, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 4335-4351

  Golinska, P ^a   Fertsch, M ^a   Pawlewski, P ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

automotive industry; disturbances; production planning and control; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY PLANTS; COMPLEX PRODUCTION; DISTURBANCES; MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; PRODUCTION FLOWS; PRODUCTION PLANNING AND CONTROL; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY;

AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURE; AUTOMOBILE PLANTS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PRODUCTION CONTROL; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY;

EID: 79958830384     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.536180     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Brennan, L. and Gupta, S.M., 1993. A structured analysis of material requirements planning systemsunder combined demand and supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (7), 1689-1707.
2. Cox, J.F. and Blackstone, J.H., 1998. APICS dictionary. 9th edition. Alexandria, VA: APICS, TheEducational Society for Resource Management.
3. Golinska, P., et al., 2006. A model for production flow control in a machines assembly plantin conditions of process lead times uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the flexible automationand intelligent manufacturing international conference (FAIM 2006), 25-27 June, Limerick, Ireland, 651-658.
4. Golinska, P., Fertsch, M., and Pawlewski, P., 2009. Quick scan of the production system fordisturbances. In: Proceedings of the flexible automation and intelligent manufacturinginternational conference (FAIM 2009), 6-8 July 2009, Middlesbrough, UK, 532-540.
5. Guide, V.D.R. and Srivastava, R., 2000. A review of techniques for buffering against uncertaintywith MRP systems. Production, Planning and Control, 11 (3), 223-233. (Pubitemid 35394352)
6. Ho, C.J. and Carter, P.L., 1996. An investigation of alternative dampening procedures to cope withMRP system nervousness. International Journal of Production Research, 34 (1), 137-156. (Pubitemid 126519725)
7. Howard, M., 2002. 3DayCar production flexibility: solving the barriers to build-to-order withproduction and process technology. 3DayCar Programme internal report no. T5-3/02.:International Car Distribution Programme, Solihull, UK.
8. Holweg, M. and Jones, D.T., (2003). The challenge of building cars to order - can current automotivesupply chains cope? [online] Available from: http://www.3daycar.com [Accessed 15 March2010].
9. Koh, L.S.C., Saad, S.M., and Jones, M.H., 2002. Uncertainty under MRP-planned manufacture:review and categorization. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (10), 2399-2421.
10. Koh, L.S.C. and Saad, S.M., 2003. How uncertainty disturbs SME manufacturers. In: Proceedings of the 17th ICPR, 3-7 August 2003, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
11. Lis, S., ed., 1982. Rytmicznosc procesu produkcji, zakiócenia i ich kompensacja. Warszawa: PWE.
12. Mason-Jones, R. and Towill, D.R., 1998. Shrinking the supply chain uncertainty circle. Control (The Journal of the Institute of Operations Management), 24 (7), 17-22.
13. Patig, S., 2001. Flexible Produktionsfeinplanung mit Hilfe von Planungsschritten. Thesis (PhD). University of Magdeburg.
14. Towill, D.R., Childerhouse, P., and Disney, S.M., 2002. Integrating the automotive supply chain:where are we now? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32 (2), 79-95.
15. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., and Roos, D., 1991. The machine that changed the world: the story of leanproduction. New York: Harper Perennial.