The use and function of snake skins in the nests of Great Reed Warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus

Ibis

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 627-630

  Trnka, Alfréd ^a   Prokop, Pavol ^a,b  

^a TRNAVA UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Grass snake; Post pairing signal; Predator deterrence hypothesis; Social mating system

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEST; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PREDATOR; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SIGNAL; SKIN; SNAKE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD;

SLOVAKIA;

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS;

EID: 79958800682     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: 1474919X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01124.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Antczak, M., Hromada, M., Czechowski, P., Tabor, J., Zabłocki, P., Grzybek, J. & Tryjanowski, P. 2010. A new material for old solution - the case of plastic string used in Great Grey Shrike nests. Acta Ethol. 13: 87-91.
2. Avilés, J.M., Moskát, C., Bán, M., Hargitai, R. & Parejo, D. 2009. Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) do not rely on indicators of parental abilities when searching for host nests: the importance of host defenses. Auk 126: 431-438.
3. Bolles, F. 1890. Snake skins in the nests of Myiarchus crinitus. Auk 7: 288.
4. Brouwer, L. & Komdeur, J. 2004. Green nesting material has afunction in mate attraction in the European Starling. Anim. Behav. 67: 539-548.
5. Cramp, S. 1992. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Hansell, M.H. 2000. Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Hansson, B., Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. 2000. Patterns of nest predation contribute to polygyny in the Great Reed Warbler. Ecology 81: 319-328.
8. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187-211.
9. Igic, B., Cassey, P., Samaš, P., Grim, T. & Hauber, M.E. 2009. Cigarette butts form aperceptually cryptic component of Song Thrush (Turdus philomelos) nests. Notornis 56: 134-138.
10. Jelínek, V. 2010. [The effect of nest quality on reproductive success in the Great Reed Warbler]. Diploma Thesis, Charles University in Prague. [in Czech].
11. Kluyver, H.N. 1955. Das Verhalten des Drosselrohrsängers, Acrocephalus arundinaceus (L.), am Brutplaz, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nestbautechnik und der Revierbehauptung. Ardea 43: 1-50.
12. Medlin, E.C. & Risch, T.S. 2006. An experimental test of snake skin use to deter nest predation. Condor 108: 963-965.
13. Mennerat, A., Perret, P. & Lambrechts, M.M. 2009. Local individual preferences for nest material in a passerine bird. PLoS ONE 4: e5104.
14. Moore, R.P. & Robinson, W.D. 2004. Artificial bird nests, external validity, and bias in ecological field studies. Ecology 85: 1562-1567.
15. Schuetz, J.G. 2005. Common Waxbills use carnivore scat to reduce the risk of nest predation. Behav. Ecol. 16: 133-137.
16. Soler, J.J., Møller, A.P. & Soler, M. 1998. Nest building, sexual selection and parental investment. Evol. Ecol. 12: 427-441.
17. Strecker, J.K. 1926. On the use, by birds, of snakes' sloughs as nesting material. Auk 43: 501-507.
18. Trnka, A. & Prokop, P. 2010. Does social mating system influence nest defence behaviour in Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) males? Ethology 116: 1075-1083.
19. Trnka, A., Prokop, P. & Batáry, P. 2008. Dummy birds in artificial nest studies: an experiment with Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Bird Study 55: 329-331.
20. Trnka, A., Batáry, P. & Prokop, P. 2009. Interacting effects of vegetation structure and breeding patterns on the survival of Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus nests. Ardea 97: 109-116.