Loss of seasonal variability in a lake resulting from copper sulfate algaecide treatment

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 36, Issue 9-11, 2011, Pages 430-435

  Song, L ^a   Marsh, T L ^b   Voice, T C ^a   Long, D T ^c  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeochemistry; Copper sulfate; Lakes; Photosynthesis; Rain event; Watersheds

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; ALGAL BLOOMS; ALGAL GROWTH; AROMATICITIES; CHLOROPHYLL A; COPPER SULFATE; DISSOLVED NITROGEN; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; FLOWTHROUGH; LARGE LAKES; MICHIGAN; PUBLIC PARKS; RAIN EVENT; RAIN EVENTS; SAMPLING TIME; SEASONAL VARIABILITY; SEASONAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL MEASUREMENTS; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; TOTAL DISSOLVED COPPER; TOTAL DISSOLVED PHOSPHOROUS; VERTICAL PROFILE; WATERSHED AREAS;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; CHLOROPHYLL; COPPER; DISSOLUTION; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; GROUNDWATER; LANDFORMS; ORGANIC CARBON; PHOSPHORUS; RAIN; TURBIDITY; WATERSHEDS;

LAKES;

ALGA; ALGAL BLOOM; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; COPPER; DISSOLVED MATTER; GROWTH RESPONSE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LAKE WATER; PARAMETERIZATION; PESTICIDE; PH; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; RAINFALL; SEASONAL VARIATION; SULFATE; TEMPORAL VARIATION; WATER TEMPERATURE;

MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

ALGAE; ONDATRA;

EID: 79958776965     PISSN: 14747065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2010.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. APHA Standard Methods for the Evaluation of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association Publishing, Washington, DC.
2. Bressan M., Mougel C., Dequiedt S., Maron P., Lemanceau P., Ranjard L. Response of soil bacterial community structure to successive perturbations of different types and intensities. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10:2184-2187.
3. Chen Y.W., Qin B.Q., Teubner K., Dokulil M.T. Long-term dynamics of phytoplankton assemblages: Microcystis-domination in Lake Taihu, a large shallow lake in China. J. Plankton Res. 2003, 25:445-453.
4. Chin Y.P., Aiken G., Oloughlin E. Molecular-weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28:1853-1858.
5. Drevnick P.E., Otter R.R., Gorski P.R., Long D.T., Canfield D.E., Oris J.T. Lake-specific responses in sedimentary sulfur after copper sulfate additions to Michigan lakes. Lakes Reservoirs 2009, (in review).
6. Girvanc M.S., Campbell C.D., Killham K., Prosser J.I., Glover L.A., Girvan M.S. Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7:301-313.
7. Hanson M.J., Stefan H.G. Side effects of 58 years of copper sulfate treatment on the fairmont lakes, Minnesota. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1985, 20:889-900.
8. Haughey M.A., Anderson M.A., Whitney R.D., Taylor W.D., Losee R.F. Forms and fate of Cu in a source drinking water reservoir following CuSO4 treatment. Water Res. 2000, 34:3440-3452.
9. Havens K.E. Experimental perturbation of a freshwater plankton community: a test of hypotheses regarding the effects of stress. J. Environ. Qual. 1994, 25:80-86.
10. Hullebusch E.V., Deluchat V., Chazal P.M., Baudu M. Environmental impact of two successive chemical treatments in a small shallow eutrophied lake: Part II. Case of copper sulfate. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120:627-634.
11. Ingham County, 2009. Hawk Island History. (accessed June 2009). http://www.ingham.org/PK/HI/hihistory.htm.
12. Lampert W., Sommer U. Limnoecology 2007, Oxford University Press Publishing, London, UK.
13. Langmuir D. Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry 1996, Prentice Hall Publishing, New Jersey, USA.
14. Long, D.T., Parsons, M.J., Yansa, C.H., Yohn, S.S., McLean, C.E., Vannier, R.G., accepted for publication. Assessing the response of watersheds to catastrophic (logging) and secular (global temperature change) perturbations using sediment chemical chronologies. Appl. Geochem.
15. McKnight D.M., Chisholm S.W., Harleman D.F. CuSO4 treatment of nuisance algal blooms in drinking water reservoirs. J. Environ. Manage. 1983, 7:311-320.
16. MDNR, 2002, Michigan Geographic Data Library, Center for Geographic Information. (accessed June 2009). http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/mgdl/.
17. Moore G.T., Kellerman K.F. Copper as an algaecide and disinfectant in water supplies. Bull. Bur. Plant Ind. USDA 1905, 76:19-55.
18. MSU, 2009. Michigan State University, Horticulture Teaching and Research Center, Michigan Automated Weather Network. (accessed June 2009). http://www.agweather.geo.msu.edu/mawn/station.asp?id=msu.
19. Nalewajko C., Prepas E.E. Resuspension could increase phytoplankton photosynthesis - responses of phytoplankton photosynthesis and phosphorus kinetics to resuspended sediments in copper sulfate-treated ponds. J. Environ. Qual. 1996, 25:80-86.
20. Prescott G.W. Objectionable algae with reference to the killing of fish and other animals. Hydrobiologia 1948, 1:1-13.
21. Sanchez I., Lee G.F. Environmental chemistry of copper in Lake Monona, Wisconsin. Water Res. 1978, 12:899-903.
22. Soldo D., Behra R. Shift in community - long-term effects of copper on the structure of freshwater periphyton communities and their tolerance to copper, zinc, nickel and silver. Aquat. Toxicol. 2000, 47:181-189.
23. Wayland K.G., Long D.T., Woodhams S., Pijanowski B.C., Hyndman D.W. Identifying biogeochemical signatures of land use with baseflow synoptic sampling and factor analysis. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:180-190.
24. Xue H., Kistler D., Sigg L. Competition of copper and zinc for strong ligands in a eutrophic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1995, 40:1142-1152.