Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: Planning grasps for object rotation and translation

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-349

  Cohen, Rajal G ^a   Rosenbaum, David A ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECALL; STUDENT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTION; MOTOR SKILLS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958773343     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0311-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36-41.
2. Ansuini, C., Giosa, I., Tutella, L., Alloé, G. M., & Castiello, U. (2008). An object for an action, the same object for other actions: Effects on hand shaping. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 111-119.
3. Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture. Psychological Review, 114, 1015-1046.
4. Chapman, K. M., Weiss, D. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs (Lemur catta, Eulemur mongoz, Eulemur coronatus, Eulemur collaris, Hapalemur griseus, and Varecia rubra). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124, 229-232.
5. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
6. Fischman, M. G., Stodden, D. F., & Lehman, D. M. (2003). The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 17-24.
7. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201-215.
8. Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 867-878.
9. Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. Healy & R. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology) (pp. 317-354). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
10. Hughes, C. (1996). Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 99-107.
11. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
13. Lam, M., McFee, K., Chua, R., & Weeks, D. J. (2006). Macroscopic aspects of gross motor control: A test of the end-state comfort effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 396-400.
14. Lewin, K. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. I [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association I]. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 191-302.
15. Lewin, K. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. II [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association II]. Psychologische Forschung, 2, 65-140.
16. Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007). Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9354-9368.
17. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
18. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 4, 365-378.
19. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60, 308-317.
20. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Human Motor Control (2nd ed. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
21. Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. L. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Progress in motor control (pp. 9-25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006b). Precision requirements affect grasp choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 918-922.
23. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. M., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28-67.
24. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709-734.
26. Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C., & Caldwell, G. C. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94, 59-85.
27. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058-1073.
28. Rossetti, Y., Meckler, C., & Prablanc, C. (1994). Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 131-136.
29. Shadmehr, R., & Krakauer, J. W. (2007). A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 359-381.
30. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
31. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
32. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133-147.
33. Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy-Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 385-397.
34. Stelmach, G. E., Castiello, U., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 178-186.
35. Thibaut, J.-P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 116-129.
36. van Swieten, L. M., van Bergen, E., Williams, J. H. G., Wilson, A. D., Plumb, M. S., Kent, S. W., & Mon-Williams, M. A. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 493-499.
37. Weigelt, M., Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: Locations rather than movements are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 191-198.
38. Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Hülshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132, 68-79.
39. Weiss, D. J., & Wark, J. (2009). Hysteresis effects in a motor task in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 427-433.
40. Weiss, D. J., Wark, J. D., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science, 18, 1063-1068.
41. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, 1-27.