Improving taxonomy-based protein fold recognition by using global and local features

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2053-2064

  Yang, Jian Yi ^a   Chen, Xin ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Evolutionary information; Feature extraction; Fold recognition; Secondary structure; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; TAXONOMY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 79958772317     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23025     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jones DT, Taylort WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992; 358: 86-89.
2. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y. RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinf Comput Biology 2003; 1: 95-118.
3. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucl Acids Res 2005; 33: W244-W248.
4. Cheng J, Baldi P. A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 1456-1463.
5. 5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e2325.
6. Yan RX, Si JN, Wang C, Zhang Z. DescFold: a web server for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10: 416.
7. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Holbrook SR, Kim SH. Prediction of protein folding class using global description of amino acid sequence. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1995; 92: 8700-8704.
8. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Mayor C, Dralyuk I, Kim SH. Recognition of a protein fold in the context of the SCOP classification. Proteins: Struc Func Bioinf 1999; 35: 401-407.
9. Ding CHQ, Dubchak I. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 349-358.
10. Shen HB, Chou KC. Ensemble classifier for protein fold pattern recognition. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 1717-1722.
11. Guo X, Gao X. A novel hierarchical ensemble classifier for protein fold recognition. Protein Eng Des Select 2008; 21: 659-664.
12. Chen K, Kurgan L. PFRES: protein fold classification by using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2843-2850.
13. Dong Q, Zhou S, Guan J. A new taxonomy-based protein fold recognition approach based on autocross-covariance transformation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 2655-2662.
14. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995; 247: 536-540.
15. Chou KC. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition. Proteins: Struct Funct Gene 2001; 43: 246-255.
16. Shamim MTA, Anwaruddin M, Nagarajaram HA. Support vector machine-based classification of protein folds using the structural properties of amino acid residues and amino acid residue pairs. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 3320-3327.
17. Deschavanne P, Tufféry P. Enhanced protein fold recognition using a structural alphabet. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2009; 76: 129-137.
18. Shen HB, Chou KC. Predicting protein fold pattern with functional domain and sequential evolution information. J Theor Biol 2009; 256: 441-446.
19. Damoulas T, Girolami MA. Probabilistic multi-class multi-kernel learning: on protein fold recognition and remote homology detection. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 1264-1270.
20. Ying Y, Huang K, Campbell C. Enhanced protein fold recognition through a novel data integration approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10: 267.
21. Bologna G, Appel RD. A comparison study on protein fold recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Vol. 5, Singapore, 2002. pp 2492-2496.
22. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-3402.
23. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999; 292: 195-202.
24. Lindahl E, Elofsson A. Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level. J Mol Biol 2000; 295: 613-625.
25. Patthy L. Detecting homology of distantly related proteins with consensus sequences. J Mol Biol 1987; 198: 567-577.
26. Yang JY, Peng ZL, Chen X. Prediction of protein structural classes for low-homology sequences based on predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: S9.
27. Kurgan L, Cios K, Chen K. SCPRED: Accurate prediction of protein structural class for sequences of twilight-zone similarity with predicting sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9: 266.
28. Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L. Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10: 414.
29. Yang JY, Peng ZL, Yu ZG, Zhang RJ, Anh V, Wang D. Prediction of protein structural classes by recurrence quantification analysis based on chaos game representation. J Theor Biol 2009; 257: 618-626.
30. Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer Verlag; 1995.
31. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, Software available at, 2001.
32. Rangwala H, Karypis G. Profile-based direct kernels for remote homology detection and fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 4239-4247.
33. Peng J, Xu J. Boosting protein threading accuracy. Lec Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541: 31-45.