Is the honeymoon effect valid in the presence of both exchange rate and output expectations? A graphical analysis

International Review of Economics and Finance

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 140-146

  Lai, Ching chong ^a,b,c,d   Fang, Chung rou ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Exchange rate target zones; Exchange rate expectations; New Keynesian model; Output expectations

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958771621     PISSN: 10590560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2011.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Argy V. International macroeconomics: Theory and policy 1994, Routledge, New York.
2. Bertola G., Caballero R.J. Target zones and realignments. American Economic Review 1992, 82:520-536.
3. Bertola G., Svensson L.E.O. Stochastic devaluation risk and the empirical fit of target zone models. Review of Economic Studies 1993, 60:689-712.
4. Broome S.G. Limited reserves and the optimal width of an exchange rate target zone. Open Economic Review 2005, 16:263-281.
5. Clarida R., Galí J., Gertler M. The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 1999, 39:1661-1707.
6. Fidrmuc J., Horváth R. Volatility of exchange rates in selected new EU members: Evidence from daily data. Economic Systems 2008, 32:103-118.
7. Flood R.P., Garber P.M. The linkage between speculative attack and target zone models of exchange rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991, 106:1367-1372.
8. Flood R.P., Rose A.K., Mathieson D.J. An empirical exploration of exchange rate target zones. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy 1991, 35:7-66.
9. Fuhrer C., Rudebusch D. Estimating the Euler equation for output. Journal of Monetary Economics 2004, 51:1133-1151.
10. Kara A., Nelson E. International evidence on the stability of the optimizing IS equation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2004, 66:687-712.
11. Kempa B., Nelles M. Nonfundamental FX trading and excess volatility in credible target zones: Theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance 1999, 8:55-70.
12. Kempa B., Nelles M. The theory of exchange target zones. Journal of Economic Surveys 1999, 13:173-210.
13. Kerr W., King R.G. Limits on interest rate rules in the IS model. Economic Quarterly 1996, 83:47-75. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
14. King R.G. Will the New Keynesian macroeconomics resurrect the IS-LM model?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1993, 7:67-82.
15. King R.G. The new IS-LM model: Language, logic, and limits. Economic Quarterly 2000, 86:669-682. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
16. Kočenda E. Altered band and exchange volatility. Economics of Transition 1998, 6:173-181.
17. Krugman P. Target zones and exchange rate dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991, 106:669-682.
18. Lai C.C., Fang C.R., Chang J.J. Volatility trade-offs in exchange rate target zones. International Review of Economics and Finance 2008, 17:366-379.
19. McCallum B.T., Nelson E. An optimizing IS-LM specification for monetary policy and business cycle analysis. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1999, 31:296-316.
20. Mundell R.A. Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 1963, 29:475-485.
21. Svensson L.E.O. An interpretation of recent research on exchange rate target zones. Journal of Economic perspectives 1992, 6:119-144.
22. Tristani O. Variable probability of realignment in a target zone. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 1994, 96:1-14.
23. Werner A.M. Exchange rate target zone, realignment and interest rate differential: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics 1995, 39:353-367.