The diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound guided imaging algorithm in evaluation of patients with hematuria

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 7-11

  Ünsal, Alparslan ^a   Çalişkan, Eda Kazak ^a   Erol, Haluk ^a   Karaman, Can Zafer ^a  

^a ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Hematuria; Imaging algorithm; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY TRACT DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 79958767893     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy. Part I. Definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology 2001;57:599-603.
2. Jaffe JS, Ginsberg PC, Gill R, Harkaway RC. A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology 2001;57(5):889-94. (Pubitemid 32405307)
3. Khadra MH, Pickard RS, Charlton M, Powell PH, Neal DE. A prospective analysis of 1930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 2000;163(2):524-7.
4. Mazhari R, Kimmel PL. Hematuria: an algorithmic approach to finding the cause. Cleve Clin J Med 2002;69(11), 870, 872-4, 876.
5. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy. Part II. Patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-10.
6. Amis ES. Epitaph for the urogram. Radiology 1999;213:639-40.
7. Dalla Palma L.What is left of i.v. urography? Eur Radiol 2001;11(6):931-9.
8. Nikken JJ, Krestin GP. MRI of the kidney-state of the art. Eur Radiol 2007;17(11):2780-93.
9. Kawashima A, Glockner JF, King Jr BF. CT urography and MR urography. Radiol Clin N Am 2003;41(5):945-61. (Pubitemid 37152085)
10. Joffe SA, Servaes S, Okon S, Horowitz M. Multi-detector row CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria. Radiographics 2003;23(6):1441-55. (Pubitemid 37487522)
11. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002;222: 353-60. (Pubitemid 34106104)
12. Chai RY, Saini S, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Comprehensive "one-stop" evaluation of patients with hematuria using multi-slice CT. Radiology 2000;217:454-5.
13. Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N. Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol 2006;16(12):2670-86. (Pubitemid 44823921)
14. Knöpfle E, Hamm M, Wartenberg S. Bohndorf KCT in ureterolithiasis with a radiation dose equal to intravenous urography: results in 209 patients. Rofo 2003;175(12):1667-72. (Pubitemid 38019849)
15. Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW, Sommer G. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(2):314-22. (Pubitemid 47195915)