Capital costs and energy considerations of different alternative stripper configurations for post combustion CO2 capture

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1229-1236

  Karimi, Mehdi ^a   Hillestad, Magne ^a   Svendsen, Hallvard F ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

CO2 avoided cost; MEA; Stripper configurations; Total capture cost

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS ABSORPTION; AVOIDED COSTS; CAPITAL COSTS; CAPITAL INVESTMENT; CHEMICAL PRODUCTION; COMPRESSION EFFICIENCY; COMPRESSION WORK; CORROSION PROBLEMS; COST CALCULATION; ENERGY CONSIDERATIONS; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; HEAT INTEGRATION; HEAT REQUIREMENTS; IN-PIPE; INLET TEMPERATURE; INTEREST RATES; INVESTMENT COSTS; MATERIAL COST; MEA; POST-COMBUSTION; PROCESS SIMULATIONS; SINGLE CONFIGURATION; STRIPPER CONFIGURATIONS; TOTAL CAPTURE COST; VAPOR RECOMPRESSION;

CHEMICAL PLANTS; COSTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GAS PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; IMAGE COMPRESSION; INVESTMENTS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; WATER CONTENT; WATER INJECTION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 79958766803     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 2 compressors. Carbon Capture J. 2009, 11:19-21.
2. Barth D., Tondre C., Delpuech J.J. Stopped flow investigations of the reaction kinetics of carbon dioxide with some primary and secondary alkanolamines in aqueous solutions. Int. J. Chem. Kinetics 1986, 18:445-457.
3. Chemical Engineering, 2010, August. New York, vol. 117, no. 8, p. 51.
4. Goff P.L., Cachot T., Rivera R. Exergy analysis of distillation processes. Chem. Eng. Technol. 1996, 19:478-485.
5. 2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:2465-2472.
6. th Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2010.
7. Leites I.L., Sama D.A., Lior N. The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes. Energy 2003, 28:55-97.
8. Luo X., Knudsen J.N., Montigny D.D., Sanpasertparnich T., Idem R., Gelowitz D., Notz R., Hoch S., Hasse H., Lemaire E., Alix P., Tobiesen F.A., Juliussen O., Köpcke M., Svendsen H.F. Comparison and validation of simulation codes against sixteen sets of data from four different pilot plants. GHTG 9 Proceeding 2009, 1249-1256.
9. 2 capture by aqueous amine. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:2457-2464.
10. 2 capture by aqueous amines. AIChE J. 2007, 53:3144-3154.
11. 2 capturing plant. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Gas Processing Symposium 2010, 331-338.
12. Schach M.O., Schneider R., Schramm H., Repke J.U. Techno-economic analysis of post-combustion processes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:2363-2370.
13. Sinnott R.K., Towler G. Chemical Engineering Design 2009, Elsevier. 5th ed.
14. Turton R., Bailie R.C., Whiting W.B., Shaeiwitz J.A. Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes 2009, Prentice-Hall. 3rd ed.
15. Unisim Design R380, Simulation Basis, Honeywell Company, 2008.