Responsiveness of the VAS and McGill Pain Questionnaire in measuring changes in musculoskeletal pain

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 250-255

  Chaffee, Amy ^a   Yakuboff, Mariel ^a   Tanabe, Tomomi ^a  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958759073     PISSN: 10566716     EISSN: 15433072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.20.2.250     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Scrimshaw SV, Christopher. M. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2001;24:501-504.
2. Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Boge B, Ask T, Johnsen TB. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:917-925.
3. Cleather DJ, Guthrie SR. Quantifying delayed-onset muscle soreness: a comparison of unidirectional and multidirectional instrumentation. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:845-850.
4. Fisher K. Assessing clinically meaningful change following a programme for managing chronic pain. Clin Rehabil. 2007;22:252-259.
5. Kaplan SL. Outcome Measurement and Management: First Steps for the Practicing Clinician. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2007.
6. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191-197.