A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Romero, Gustavo Q ^a   Antiqueira, Pablo A P ^b   Koricheva, Julia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; FLY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HYMENOPTERA; LEPIDOPTERA; LIFESTYLE; NONHUMAN; POLLINATOR; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR AVOIDANCE; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PREDATOR STRESS; REPTILE; REVIEW; SPIDER; SQUAMATA; ANIMAL; ANT; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; FLOWER; META ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; PREDATION; RISK FACTOR; TIME;

ANIMALIA; APOIDEA; DIPTERA; HYMENOPTERA; LEPIDOPTERA; SQUAMATA; THOMISIDAE;

ANIMALS; ANTS; BODY SIZE; FLOWERS; POLLINATION; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RISK FACTORS; SPIDERS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79958757922     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020689     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Lima SL, (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. BioScience 48: 25-34.
2. Werner EE, Peacor SD, (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84: 1083-1100.
3. Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF, (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86: 501-509.
4. Laundré JW, Hernández L, Ripple WJ, (2010) The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. The Open Ecology Journal 3: 1-7.
5. Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE, (2009) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 400-407.
6. Clark CW, Dukas R, (1994) Balancing foraging and antipredator demands-an advantage of sociality. American Naturalist 144: 542-548.
7. Dukas R, (2001) Effects of perceived danger on flower choice by bees. Ecology Letters 4: 327-333.
8. Bristowe WS, (1958) The world of spiders. Collins, London.
9. Abbott KR, Dukas R, (2009) Honeybees consider flower danger in their waggle dance. Animal Behaviour 78: 633-635.
10. Brechbühl R, Casas J, Bacher S, (2010a) Ineffective crypsis in a crab spider: a prey community perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277: 739-746.
11. Defrize J, Théry M, Casas J, (2010) Background colour matching by a crab spider in the field: a community sensory ecology perspective. The Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 1425-1435.
12. Dukas R, (2004) Effects of predation risk on pollinators and plants. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution pp. 214-236 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Dukas R, (2005) Bumble bee predators reduce pollinator density and plant fitness. Ecology 86: 1401-1406.
14. Ings TC, Chittka L, (2008) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs and false alarms in bee responses to cryptic predators. Current Biology 18: 1520-1524.
15. Ings TC, Chittka L, (2009) Predator crypsis enhances behaviourally mediated indirect effects on plants by altering bumblebee foraging preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2031-2036.
16. Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, McCoy KA, Holt RD, (2005) Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437: 880-883.
17. Suttle KB, (2003) Pollinators as mediators of top-down effects on plants. Ecology Letters 6: 688-694.
18. Reader T, Higginson AD, Barnard CJ, Gilbert FS, (2006) The effects of predation risk from crab spiders on bee foraging behaviour. Behavioral Ecology 17: 933-939.
19. Elliott NB, Elliott WM, (1994) Recognition and avoidance of the predator Phymata americana Melin on Solidago odora Ait. by late season floral visitors. American Midland Naturalist 131: 378-380.
20. Willmer PG, Nuttman CV, Raine NE, Stone GN, Pattrick JG, et al. (2009) Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Functional Ecology 23: 888-900.
21. Muñoz AA, Arroyo MTK, (2004) Negative impacts of a vertebrate predator on insect pollinator visitation and seed output in Chuquiraga oppositifolia, a high Andean shrub. Oecologia 138: 66-73.
22. Morse DH, (1986) Predatory risk to insects foraging at flowers. Oikos 46: 223-228.
23. Gonçalves-Souza T, Omena PM, Souza JC, Romero GQ, (2008) Trait-mediated effects on flowers: artificial spiders deceive pollinators and decrease plant fitness. Ecology 89: 2407-2413.
24. Théry M, Casas J, (2002) Predator and prey views of spider camouflage. Nature 415: 133.
25. Heiling AM, Herberstein ME, Chittka L, (2003) Crab-spiders manipulate flower signals. Nature 421: 334.
26. Schmitz OJ, (2007) Predator diversity and trophic interactions. Ecology 88: 2415-2426.
27. Romero GQ, Koricheva J, (2011) Contrasting cascade effects of carnivores on plant fitness: a meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology (submitted).
28. Morse DH, (2007) Predator upon a flower: life history and fitness in a crab spider. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
29. Knight TM, Chase JM, Hillebrand H, Holt RD, (2006) Predation on mutualists can reduce the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters 9: 1173-1178.
30. Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL, (2010) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS, (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
32. Romero GQ, Vasconcellos-Neto J, (2007) Biotic interactions between plants, herbivores and spiders. In: Gonzaga MO, Santos AJ, Japyassú HF, editors. Ecology and behaviour of spiders [in portuguese] In: Interciência, Rio de Janeiro.
33. Brechbühl R, Kropf C, Bacher S, (2010b) Impact of flower-dwelling crab spiders on plant-pollinator mutualisms. Basic and Applied Ecology 11: 76-82.
34. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS, (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150-1156.
35. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV, (2001) Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments pp. 347-369 Oxford University Press, New York.
36. Hedges LV, Olkin I, (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
37. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J, (2000) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis (Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates).
38. Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS, (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. American Naturalist 174: 134-140.
39. Dukas R, Morse DH, (2003) Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees. Oikos 101: 157-163.
40. Muller H, Grossman H, Chittka L, (2010) 'Personality' in bumblebees: individual consistency in response to novel colours? Animal Behaviour 80: 1065-1074.
41. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC, eds. (2007) Foraging: behaviour and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
42. Chittka L, Niven JE, (2009) Are bigger brains better? Current Biology 19: R995-R1008.
43. Weiss MR, (2004) Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution pp. 171-190 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Tsuji K, Hasyim A, Harlion, Nakamura K, (2004) Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecological Research 19: 669-673.
45. Menzel R, (2004) Behavioral and neural mechanisms of learning and memory as determinants of flower constancy. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution pp. 21-40 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.