Comparison of digital and film grading of diabetic retinopathy severity in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 129, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 718-726

  Hubbard, Larry D ^a   Sun, Wanjie ^b   Cleary, Patricia A ^b   Danis, Ronald P ^a   Hainsworth, Dean P ^c   Peng, Qian ^a   Susman, Ruth A ^a   Aiello, Lloyd Paul ^d   Davis, Matthew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Missouri   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAMERAS AND FILMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCIDENCE; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79958746228     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.136     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.
2. The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(1):36-51.
3. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(4):647-661.
4. Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Research Group. Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC). Design, implementation, and preliminary results of a long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial cohort. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(1):99-111.
5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(6):381-389.
6. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA, et al. Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1707-1715.
7. Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. JAMA. 2003;290(16):2159-2167.
8. Martin CL, Albers J, Herman WH, et al; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Neuropathy among the diabetes control and complications trial cohort 8 years after trial completion. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(2):340-344. (Pubitemid 44106515)
9. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2643-2653.
10. Donner A, Eliasziw M. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Stat Med. 1992;11(11):1511-1519.
11. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257-268. (Pubitemid 40333545)
12. Diabetic retinopathy study. Report number 6: design, methods, and baseline results: report number 7: a modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy: prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21(1, pt 2):1-226.
13. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification: ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5)(suppl):786-806.
14. Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al; Age-Related Eye Disease 2 Research Group. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(8):3269-3282.
15. Gardner TW, Sander B, Larsen ML, et al. An extension of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) system for grading of diabetic macular edema in the Astemizole Retinopathy Trial. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31(6):535-547. (Pubitemid 43884600)
16. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5)(suppl):823-833.
17. Shoukri M. Measures of Interobserver Agreement. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2004.
18. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213-220.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
20. Bhapkar VP. A note on the equivalence of two test criteria for hypotheses in categorical data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1966;61:228-235. doi:10.2307/2283057.
21. McNEMAR Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 1947;12(2):153-157.
22. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa I: the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-549. (Pubitemid 20178543)
23. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101-120. doi:10.2307/3001666.
24. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):204-213. (Pubitemid 34831824)
25. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971;76:378-382. doi:10.1037/h0031619.
26. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, et al; Joslin Vision Network Research Team. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(3):572-585. (Pubitemid 32179901)
27. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL; Inoveon Health Research Group. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(3):595-601. (Pubitemid 34187645)
28. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(9):1748-1754. (Pubitemid 47332653)
29. Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, et al. Digital versus film fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5846-5852.
30. Reimers JL, Gangaputra S, Esser B, et al. Green channel vs color retinal images for grading diabetic retinopathy in DCCT/EDIC [ARVO abstract 2285]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:e-Abstract 2285. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6303.