Comparison of microbial activity in anaerobic and microaerobic digesters

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2244-2249

  Jenicek, P ^a   Celis, C A ^a   Koubova, J ^a   Pokorna, D ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Foaming; Methanogenic bacteria; Microaerobic conditions; Sulfate reducing bacteria; Sulfide oxidizing bacteria

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; BIOMASS ACTIVITY; LONG-TERM OPERATION; MICROAERATION; MICROAEROBIC CONDITIONS; MICROAEROBICS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITIES; SLUDGE QUALITY; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA; SULFIDE CONCENTRATION; SULFIDE-OXIDIZING BACTERIA;

BACTERIA; BACTERIOLOGY; BIOMASS; PULP DIGESTERS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

SULFIDE;

AERATION; BACTERIUM; BIOACTIVITY; BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FOAM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; OXIC CONDITIONS; SULFIDE;

AERATION; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOAMING; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NONHUMAN; SLUDGE DIGESTION; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER;

BACTERIA, AEROBIC; BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BIOREACTORS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; METHANE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SEWAGE; SULFATES; SULFIDES;

EID: 79958744456     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.579     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation 1998 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
2. Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J. L., Guwy, A. J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P. & van Lier, J. B. 2009 Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 59 (5), 927-934.
3. Buisman, C. J. N., Geraats, S., Ijspeert, P. & Lettinga, G. 1990 Optimization of sulphur production in a biotechnological sulphide removing reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35, 50-56.
4. Cirne, D. G., van der Zee, F. P., Fdz-Polanco, M. & Fdz-Polanco, F. 2008 Control of sulphide during anaerobic treatment of S-containing wastewaters by adding limited amounts of oxygen or nitrate. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 7, 93-105.
5. Dohanyos, M., Zabranska, J. & Jenicek, P. 1997 Innovative technology for the improvement of the anaerobic methane fermentation. Water Sci. Technol. 36 (6-7), 333-340.
6. Fdz-Polanco, M., Diaz, I., Perez, S. I., Lopes, A. C. & Fdz-Polanco, F. 2009 Hydrogen sulphide removal in the anaerobic digestion of sludge by micro-aerobic processes: pilot plant experience. Wat. Sci. Tech. 60 (12), 3045-3050.
7. Jenicek, P., Koubova, J., Bindzar, J. & Zabranska, J. 2010 Advantages of anaerobic digestion of sludge in microaerobic conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 62 (2), 427-434.
8. Jenicek,P.,Maca, J.,Keclik, F.&Bindzar, J. 2008 Use ofmicroaerobic condition for the improvement of anaerobic digestion of solid wastes.Water Sci. Technol. 58 (7), 1491-1496.
9. Jenicek, P., Smejkalova, P. & Horecky, P. 2005 Biological microaerobic sulphide removal with respect to specific biomass activity. In Proceedings of the International Conference Anaerobic Digestion of SolidWastes, Copenhagen, 2005 pp. 145-148.
10. Johansen, J. E. & Bakke, R. 2006 Enhancing hydrolysis with microaeration. Water Sci. Technol. 53 (8), 43-50.
11. Kato, M. T., Field, J. A. & Lettinga, G. 2003 High tolerance of methanogens in granular sludge to oxygen. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42, 1360-1366.
12. Khanal, S. K. & Huang, J. C. 2003 ORP-based oxygenation for sulfide control in anaerobic treatment of high-sulfate wastewater. Water Res. 37, 2053-2062. (Pubitemid 36407555)
13. Krishnakumar, B., Majumdar, S., Manilal, V. B. & Haridas, A. 2005 Treatment of sulphide containing wastewater with sulphur recovery in a novel reverse fluidized loop reactor (RFLR). Water Res. 39, 639-647. (Pubitemid 40221886)
14. Lens, P. N. L., Wisser, A., Janssen, A. J. H., Hulshoff Pol, L. W. & Lettinga, G. 1998 Biotechnological treatment of sulphaterich wastewaters. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1), 41-88.
15. Pagilla, K. P., Jenkins, D. & Kido, W. H. 1996 Nocardia control in activated sludge by classifying selectors. Wat. Environ. Res. 68 (2), 235-239.
16. Stephenson, R. J., Patoine, M. A. & Guiot, S. R. 1999 Effects of oxygenation and upflowliquid velocity on a coupled anaerobic/ aerobic reactor system.Water Res. 33 (12), 2855-2863.
17. Tang, Y., Shigematsu, T., Ikbal, Morimura, S. & Kida, K. 2004 The effects of micro-aeration on the phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms in a thermophilic anaerobic municipal solidwaste digester. Water Res. 38, 2537-2550. (Pubitemid 38680736)
18. van der Zee, F. P., Villaverde, S., Garcia, P. A. & Fdz-Polanco, F. 2007 Sulfide removal by moderate oxygenation of anaerobic sludge environments. Bioresource Technol. 98 (3), 518-524. (Pubitemid 44374994)
19. Zacharias, B., Lang, E. & Hajery, H. H. 1995 Biodegradation of chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons in slow sand filters simulating conditions in contaminated soil-pilot study for in situ clearing of an industrial site. Water Res. 29 (7), 1663-1671
20. Zaplatilkova, P. 2004 Study of Relation of Anaerobic Digester Microbial Ecosystem and Digested Activated Sludge Quality. PhD Thesis, Department of Water Technology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Czech Republic.
21. Zitomer, D. H. & Shrout, J. D. 1998 Feasibility and benefits of methanogenesis under oxygen-limited conditions. Waste Manage. 18, 107-116. (Pubitemid 28492207)