The fiber diameter of synthetic bioresorbable extracellular matrix influences human fibroblast morphology and fibronectin matrix assembly

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 127, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2312-2320

  Hsia, Henry C ^a,b   Nair, Mohan R ^a,b   Mintz, R Candida ^a,b   Corbett, Siobhan A ^a,b  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOPOLYMER; DRUG DERIVATIVE; FIBRONECTIN; NANOFIBER; POLY(DESAMINOTYROSYL TYROSINE ETHYL ESTER CARBONATE); POLY(DESAMINOTYROSYL-TYROSINE-ETHYL ESTER CARBONATE); TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TYROSINE;

ABSORPTION; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ABSORPTION; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPOLYMERS; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; NANOFIBERS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TYROSINE;

EID: 79958741478     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182139fa4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Horan RL, Bramono DS, Stanley JR, et al. Biological and biomechanical assessment of a long-term bioresorbable silkderived surgical mesh in an abdominal body wall defect model. Hernia 2009;13:189-199.
2. Eberli D, Rodriguez S, Atala A, Yoo JJ. In vivo evaluation of acellular human dermis for abdominal wall repair. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010;93:1527-1538.
3. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 429-436.
4. Becker S, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: A preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1-6; discussion 107-108.
5. Petrigliano FA, McAllister DR, Wu BM. Tissue engineering for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A review of current strategies. Arthroscopy 2006;22:441-451.
6. Bourke SL, Kohn J, Dunn MG. Preliminary development of a novel resorbable synthetic polymer fiber scaffold for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tissue Eng. 2004;10: 43-52. (Pubitemid 38199359)
7. Chong AK, Riboh J, Smith RL, Lindsey DP, Pham HM, Chang J. Flexor tendon tissue engineering: Acellularized and reseeded tendon constructs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1759-1766.
8. Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M. Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12: 463-518.
9. Hynes R. Fibronectins. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
10. Clark RAF, Henson PM. The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1996.
11. Sottile J, Hocking DC. Fibronectin polymerization regulates the composition and stability of extracellular matrix fibrils and cell-matrix adhesions. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:3546-3559. (Pubitemid 35191374)
12. Velling T, Risteli J, Wennerberg K, Mosher DF, Johansson S. Polymerization of type I and III collagens is dependent on fibronectin and enhanced by integrins alpha 11beta 1 and alpha 2beta 1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:37377-37381.
13. Ertel SI, Kohn J. Evaluation of a series of tyrosine-derived polycarbonates as degradable biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:919-930. (Pubitemid 24237855)
14. Asikainen AJ, Pelto M, Noponen J, et al. In vivo degradation of poly(DTE carbonate) membranes: Analysis of the tissue reactions and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:53-58.
15. Meechaisue C, Dubin R, Supaphol P, Hoven VP, Kohn J. Electrospun mat of tyrosine-derived polycarbonate fibers for potential use as tissue scaffolding material. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17:1039-1056. (Pubitemid 44559974)
16. Hedman K, Vaheri A, Wartiovaara J. External fibronectin of cultured human fibroblasts is predominantly a matrix protein. J Cell Biol. 1978;76:748-760. (Pubitemid 8295912)
17. Tanaka M, Abe T, Hara Y. Roles of focal adhesions and fibronectin-mediated cohesion in proliferation of confluent fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:194-201.
18. Lawrence BJ, Madihally SV. Cell colonization in degradable 3D porous matrices. Cell Adh Migr. 2008;2:9-16.
19. Eichhorn SJ, Sampson WW. Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. J R Soc Interface 2005;2:309-318.
20. Roman J, LaChance RM, Broekelmann TJ, et al. The fibronectin receptor is organized by extracellular matrix fibronectin: Implications for oncogenic transformation and for cell recognition of fibronectin matrices. J Cell Biol. 1989; 108:2529-2543. (Pubitemid 19168941)
21. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001; 294:1708-1712. (Pubitemid 33104840)
22. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer JE. Stimulatory effects of a three-dimensional microenvironment on cell-mediated fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:4427-4436. (Pubitemid 41556341)
23. Liu Y, Ji Y, Ghosh K, Clark RA, Huang L, Rafailovich MH. Effects of fiber orientation and diameter on the behavior of human dermal fibroblasts on electrospun PMMA scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90:1092-1106.
24. Liu Y, Franco A, Huang L, Gersappe D, Clark RA, Rafailovich MH. Control of cell migration in two and three dimensions using substrate morphology. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:2544-2557.