A comparison of different automated methods for the detection of white matter lesions in MRI data

NeuroImage

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 416-422

  Klöppel, Stefan ^a   Abdulkadir, Ahmed ^a   Hadjidemetriou, Stathis ^a   Issleib, Sabine ^a   Frings, Lars ^a   Thanh, Thao Nguyen ^a   Mader, Irina ^a   Teipel, Stefan J ^b   Hüll, Michael ^a   Ronneberger, Olaf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dementia; Imaging; KNN; SVM; White matter hyperintensities

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; K NEAREST NEIGHBOR; MALE; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; T1 WEIGHTED IMAGING; WHITE MATTER LESION;

AGED; BRAIN; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE FIBERS, MYELINATED;

EID: 79958722332     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.053     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Admiraal-Behloul F., et al. Fully automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in MR images of the elderly. Neuroimage 2005, 28:607-617.
2. Anbeek P., et al. Probabilistic segmentation of white matter lesions in MR imaging. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1037-1044.
3. Anbeek P., et al. Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation. Med. Image Anal. 2004, 8:205-215.
4. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005, 26:839-851.
5. Bishop C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 2006, Springer, New York.
6. Chang C.C., Lin C.J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines p. from. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
7. Davatzikos C., et al. Longitudinal progression of Alzheimer's-like patterns of atrophy in normal older adults: the SPARE-AD index. Brain 2009, 132:2026-2035.
8. Fu C.H., et al. Pattern classification of sad facial processing: toward the development of neurobiological markers in depression. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 63:656-662.
9. Gabor D. Theory of communication. J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 1946, 93:429-457.
10. Hirono N., et al. Impact of white matter changes on clinical manifestation of alzheimer's disease: a quantitative study. Stroke 2000, 31:2182-2188.
11. Jack C.R., et al. FLAIR histogram segmentation for measurement of leukoaraiosis volume. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 14:668-676.
12. Kapeller P., et al. CT and MRI rating of white matter changes. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 2002, 41-45.
13. Klöppel S., et al. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2008, 131:681-689.
14. Kornhuber J., et al. Early and differential diagnosis of dementia and mild cognitive impairment: design and cohort baseline characteristics of the German Dementia Competence Network. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2009, 27:404-417.
15. Koutsouleris N., et al. Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009, 66:700-712.
16. Lao Z., et al. Computer-assisted segmentation of white matter lesions in 3D MR images using support vector machine. Acad. Radiol. 2008, 15:300-313.
17. Maillard P., et al. An automated procedure for the assessment of white matter hyperintensities by multispectral (T1, T2, PD) MRI and an evaluation of its between-centre reproducibility based on two large community databases. Neuroradiology 2008, 50:31-42.
18. Müller K., et al. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2001, 12:181-201.
19. Prins N.D., et al. Measuring progression of cerebral white matter lesions on MRI: visual rating and volumetrics. Neurology 2004, 62:1533-1539.
20. Quddus A., et al. Adaboost and support vector machines for white matter lesion segmentation in MR images. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2005, 1:463-466.
21. Saur D., et al. Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. Brain 2010, 133:1252-1264.
22. Scheltens P., et al. A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurol. Sci. 1993, 114:7-12.
23. Schmahmann J.D., et al. Cerebral white matter: neuroanatomy, clinical neurology, and neurobehavioral correlates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1142:266-309.
24. Schnell S., et al. Fully automated classification of HARDI in vivo data using a support vector machine. Neuroimage 2009, 46:642-651.
25. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002, 15:273-289.
26. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley Interscience, New York.
27. Vemuri P., et al. MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change. Neurology 2009, 73:294-301.
28. Wahlund L.O., et al. A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke 2001, 32:1318-1322.
29. Wu M., et al. A fully automated method for quantifying and localizing white matter hyperintensities on MR images. Psychiatry Res. 2006, 148:133-142.
30. Zijdenbos A.P., et al. Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1994, 13:716-724.