The dynamics of disruption from altered auditory feedback: Further evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 949-967

  Pfordresher, Peter Q ^a   Kulpa, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Altered auditory feedback; Delayed auditory feedback; Sensorimotor adaptation; Sequencing; Timing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERIODICITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PERIODICITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; SERIAL LEARNING; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958722002     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021435     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Black J.W. The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1951, 16:56-60.
2. Boltz M. Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:1080-1096.
3. Chaffin, R., Ginsborg, J., & Dixon, J. (2009). Serial position effects in a singer's long term recall identify landmarks and lacunae in memory. In J. Louhivouri, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio, T. Himberg, & P.-S. Eerola (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM 2009) (pp. 38-43).
4. Chaffin R., Imreh G. Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychological Science 2002, 13:342-349.
5. Chaffin R., Logan T., Bergosh K.T. Performing from memory. The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology 2009, 352-363. Oxford University Press, Oxford. S. Hallam, I. Cross, M. Thaut (Eds.).
6. Cynx J., von Rand U. Immediate and transitory effects of delayed auditory feedback on bird song production. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:305-312.
7. Fairbanks G., Guttman N. Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1958, 1:333-346.
8. Finney S.A. Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Perception 1997, 15:153-174.
9. Finney S.A. FTAP: A linux-based program for tapping and music experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2001, 33:65-72.
10. Finney S.A., Palmer C. Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:51-64.
11. Finney S.A., Warren W.H. Delayed auditory feedback and rhythmic tapping: Evidence for a critical interval shift. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:896-908.
12. Flach R. The transition from synchronization to continuation tapping. Human Movement Science 2005, 24:465-483.
13. Fraisse P., Voillaume C. Les repères du sujet dans la synchronizsation et dans la pseudo-synchronisation [The reference points of the subject during synchronization and during pseudo-synchronization]. L'Annèe Psychologique 1971, 71:359-369.
14. Gates A., Bradshaw J., Nettleton N. Effect of different delayed auditory feedback intervals on a music performance task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 14:21-25.
15. Havlicek L. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education 1968, 16:308-318.
16. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
17. Houde J.F., Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 1998, 279:1213-1216.
18. Houde J.F., Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech I: Comprehension and adaptation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2002, 45:295-310.
19. Howell P. A model of timing interference to speech control in normal and altered listening conditions applied to treatment of stuttering. Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered speech 2001, 291-294. Uttgeverij Vantilt, Nijmegen. B. Massen, W. Julstijn, R. Kent, H.F.M. Peters, P.H.M.M. Van Lieshout (Eds.).
20. Howell P. Response to commentaries on 'Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering'. Stammering Research 2004, 1:68-77.
21. Howell P., Archer A. Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback. Perception & Psychophysics 1984, 36:296-302.
22. Howell P., Powell D.J., Khan I. Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1983, 9:772-784.
23. Howell P., Sackin S. Timing interference to speech in altered listening conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 111:2842-2852.
24. Jones M.R., Boltz M. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review 1989, 96:459-491.
25. Krampe R.T., Mayr U., Kliegl R. Timing, sequencing, and executive control in repetitive movement production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:379-397.
26. Large E.W. Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1993, 25:238-241.
27. Large E.W., Fink P., Kelso J.A.S. Tracking simple and complex rhythms. Psychological Research 2002, 66:3-17.
28. Large E.W., Jones M.R. The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review 1999, 106:119-159.
29. Lee B.S. Effects of delayed speech feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1950, 22:824-826.
30. Liu H., Larson C.R. Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 122:3671-3677.
31. MacKay D.G. The organization of perception and action 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Madison G. Variability in isochronous tapping: Higher order dependencies as a function of intertap interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:411-422.
33. Maidhof C., Rieger M., Prinz W., Koelsh S. Nobody is perfect: ERP effects prior to performance errors in musicians indicate fast monitoring processes. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5032.
34. Mates J. A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. I. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics 1994, 70:475-484.
35. McAuley, J. D. (1995). Perception of time as phase: Toward an adaptive-oscillator model of rhythmic pattern processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
36. McAuley J.D., Jones M.R. Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1102-1125.
37. Müller K., Aschersleben G., Esser K.H., Müsseler J. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech: Just a problem of displaced rhythm?. Rhythm perception and production 2000, 249-262. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands. P. Desain, L. Windsor (Eds.).
38. Palmer C. Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology 1997, 48:115-138.
39. Palmer C., Drake C. Monitoring and planning capacities in the acquisition of music performance skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1997, 51:369-384.
40. Palmer C., Pfordresher P.Q. Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review 2003, 110:683-712.
41. Palmer C., van de Sande C. Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1993, 19:457-470.
42. Palmer C., van de Sande C. Range of planning in skilled music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1995, 21:947-962.
43. Pfordresher P.Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:949-964.
44. Pfordresher P.Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1331-1345.
45. Pfordresher P.Q. Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 2:183-198.
46. Pfordresher P.Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of transition-based similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:708-725.
47. Pfordresher P.Q., Benitez B. Temporal coordination between actions and sound during sequence production. Human Movement Science 2007, 26:742-756.
48. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance. Psychological Research 2002, 66:71-79.
49. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C. Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:362-376.
50. Pfordresher P.Q., Varco T. Altered auditory feedback effects on keyboard and singing performance. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition 2010, 474-477. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. S.M. Demorest, S.J. Morrison, P.S. Campbell (Eds.).
51. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C., Jungers M. Speed, accuracy, and serial order in sequence production. Cognitive Science 2007, 31:63-98.
52. Repp B.H. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. Music Perception 1999, 16:409-438.
53. Repp B.H. Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization. Psychological Research 2000, 63:106-128.
54. Repp B.H. Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:600-621.
55. Repp B.H. Processes underlying adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization. Human Movement Science 2001, 20:277-312.
56. Repp B.H. Automaticity and voluntary control of phase correction following event onset shifts in sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:410-430.
57. Repp B.H. Phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory sequences: Effects of single and periodic distracters on synchronization accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:290-309.
58. Repp B.H., Keller P.E. Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects of intention, attention, and awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):499-521.
59. Repp B.H., Knoblich G. Toward a psychophysics of agency: Detecting gain and loss of control over auditory action effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:469-482.
60. Robinson G.M. The delayed auditory feedback effect is a function of speech rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 95:1-5.
61. Ruiz M.H., Jabusch H.-C., Altenmüller E. Detecting wrong notes in advance: Neuronal correlates of error monitoring in pianists. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2625-2639.
62. Sato A., Yasuda A. Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 2005, 94:241-255.
63. Shaffer L.H., Clarke E.F., Todd N.P. Metre and rhythm in piano playing. Cognition 1985, 20:61-77.
64. Vorberg D., Hambuch R. On the temporal control of rhythmic performance. Attention and Performance 1978, VII:535-555. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Requin (Ed.).
65. Vorberg D., Wing A. Modeling variability and dependence in timing. Handbook of perception and action, Volume 2 1996, 181-262. Academic, London. H. Heuer, S.W. Keele (Eds.).
66. Wiener N. Cybernetics 1948, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
67. Wing A.M. Perturbations of auditory feedback delay and the timing of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:175-186.
68. Wing A.M., Kristofferson A.B. Response delays and the timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:5-12.
69. Yates A.J. Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin 1963, 60:213-232.