Saliency in motion: Selective rendering of dynamic virtual environments

Proceedings - SCCG 2009: 25th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 173-180

  Hasic, Jasminka ^a,b   Chalmers, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b SARAJEVO SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Author keywords

Attention; Perceptually adaptive techniques; Peripheral vision; Saliency; Selective rendering; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; PERCEPTUALLY-ADAPTIVE; PERIPHERAL VISION; SALIENCY; SELECTIVE RENDERING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTABILITY AND DECIDABILITY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 79958720128     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1980462.1980496     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. ARIS. 2003. Augmented reality image synthesis through illumination reconstruction and its integration in interactive and shared mobile ar-systems for e-(motion)-commerce applications proposal number: Ist-2000-28707. In http://aris-ist.intranet.gr/.
2. BARTZ, D., CUNNINGHAM, D. W., FISCHER, J., AND WALLRAVEN, C. 2008. The role of perception for computer graphics. In Eurographics state-of-the-art reports, Eurographics.
3. BOLIN, M., AND MEYER, G. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In SIGGRAPH 98 Conference Proceedings, 299-310.
4. BRUCE, V., GREEN, P. R., AND GEORGESON, M. A. 2003. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. Psychology Press.
5. CATER, K., CHALMERS, A., AND WARD, G. 2003. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 270-280.
6. CHALMERS, A. G., DEBATTISTA, K., AND DOS SANTOS, L. 2006. Selective rendering: Computing only what you see. In Graphite 2006, ACM SIGGRAPH, 123-131.
7. DALY, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 179-206.
8. DEBATTISTA, K. 2006. Selective rendering for high-fidelity graphics. PhD thesis, Bristol University.
9. ELLIS, G., AND CHALMERS, A. 2006. The effect of translational ego-motion on the perception of high fidelity animations. In SCCG 2006 - Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, ACM SIGGRAPH, April 2006.
10. FERWERDA, J. A., PATTANAIK, S. N., SHIRLEY, P., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 1996. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'96 Proceedings), 249-258.
11. FRANCONERI, S. L., AND SIMONS, D. J. 2003. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. In Perception & Psychophysics, 65 (7), 999-1010. (Pubitemid 37537708)
12. HABER, J., MYSZKOWSKI, K., YAMAUCHI, H., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2001. Perceptually guided corrective splatting. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 20, 142-152.
13. HASIC, J., AND CHALMERS, A. 2007. Visual attention for significantly influencing the perception of virtual environments. In Winter School of Computer Graphics WSCG2007 Proceedings.
14. HASIC, J., CHALMERS, A., MASTOROPOULOU, G., AND DEBATTISTA, K. 2007. Movement bias in visual attention for perceptually-guided selective rendering of animations. In Spring Conference on Computer Graphics SCCG2007 Proceedings.
15. HASIC, J., CHALMERS, A., AND SIKUDOVA, E. 2008. Exploiting movement in mid-peripheral vision to direct attention for selective rendering. In SCCG 2008 - Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, ACM SIGGRAPH, April 2006 (a short paper).
16. HASIC, J., CHALMERS, A., AND SIKUDOVA, E. 2008. Perceptually-guided high-fidelity rendering exploiting movement bias in visual attention. submitted to Transactions on Applied Perception.
17. ITTI, L., AND KOCH, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. In Vision Research, vol. 40, 1489-1506. (Pubitemid 30216462)
18. JAMES, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology: Volume 1. Holt, New York.
19. LONGHURST, P., DEBATTISTA, K., AND CHALMERS, A. 2006. A gpu based saliency map for high-fidelity selective rendering. In Afrigaph'06: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21-29. (Pubitemid 46620964)
20. LUEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceeding of 13h Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 221-223.
21. MACK, A., AND ROCK, I. 1998. Inattentional blindness. In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
22. MARMITT, G., AND DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2002. Modeling visual attention in vr: Measuring the accuracy of predicted scanpaths. In Eurographics 2002 (Short Presentations), 217-226.
23. MASTOROPOULOU, G., DEBATTISTA, K., CHALMERS, A., AND TROSCIANCO, T. 2005. The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations. In APGV 2005: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pages 9-15. ACM SIGGRAPH. (Pubitemid 43004906)
24. MASTOROPOULOU, G., DEBATTISTA, K., CHALMERS, A., AND TROSCIANKO, T. 2005. Auditory bias of visual attention for perceptually-guided selective rendering of animations. In GRAPHITE 2005, sponsored by ACM SIGGRAPH, Dunedin, New Zealand, ACM Press, December 2005.
25. MATHER, G. 2006. Foundations of Perception. Psychology Press.
26. MCNAMARA, A., CHALMERS, A. G., TROSCIANKO, T., AND GILCHRIST, I. 2000. Comparing real and synthetic scenes using human judgements of lightness. In Proceeding of 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering.
27. MYSZKOWSKI, K., TAWARA, T., AKAMINE, H., AND SEIDEL, H. P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, E. Fiume Ed., 221-230. (Pubitemid 33047307)
28. MYSZKOWSKI, K. 1998. The visible difference predictor: Application to global illuminarion problems. In Proceeding of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, G. Drettakis and N. Max Eds., 223-236.
29. O'SULLIVAN, C., HOWLETT, S., MORVAN, Y., MCDONNELL, R., AND O'CONNOR, K. 2004. Perceptually adaptive graphics. In STAR, Eurographics, 141-164.
30. PATTANAIK, S. N., FERWERDA, J. A., FAIRCHILD, M. D., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'98 Proceedings), 287-298.
31. PETERS, R. J., AND ITTI, L. 2008. Applying computational tools to predict gaze direction in interactive visual environments. In ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. Article 8.
32. PETTERSSON, R. 1999. Attention: An information design perspective. In Document Design, Volume 2, pp. 114-130.
33. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M., PATTANAIK, S. N., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'99 Proceedings), 73-82.
34. REDDY, M. 1997. Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments. Ph.D. Thesis (CST- 134-97), University of Edinburgh.
35. STORMS, R. L. 1998. Auditory-visual cross-modal perception phenomena. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.
36. USC. 2002-2007. University of southern california ilab neuromorphic vision c++ toolkit. In http://ilab.usc.edu/toolkit.
37. VU. 2008. Vanderbilt university: Department of biostatics: Ps power and sample size calculation. In biostat. mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/ PowerSampleSize.
38. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 213-220. (Pubitemid 33047306)
39. YARBUS, A. 1967. Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In Eye Movements and Vision, 171-196.
40. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, vol. 20, 39-65. (Pubitemid 33604753)