Case study: Improving real-time stage forecasting muskingum model by incorporating the rating curve model

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 540-557

  Barbetta, Silvia ^a   Moramarco, Tommaso ^a   Franchini, Marco ^b   Melone, Florisa ^a   Brocca, Luca ^a   Singh, Vijay P ^c  

^a CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^c Texas A M University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive procedure; Flood forecasting; Lateral Inflows; Muskingum method; Real time

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE PROCEDURE; FLOOD FORECASTING; LATERAL INFLOWS; MUSKINGUM METHOD; REAL TIME;

CLIMATE MODELS; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; RIVERS; WATER LEVELS; WATERSHEDS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

FLOOD FORECASTING; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; REAL TIME; RIVER BASIN; RIVER CHANNEL; RIVER DISCHARGE; WATER LEVEL;

ITALY; TIBER RIVER;

EID: 79958714869     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000345     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 1993, 119(3):429-442. ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division, JIDEDH, 0733-9437, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:3(429), ".".
2. Barbetta S. Brocca L. Melone F. Moramarco T. On the lateral inflow assessment within real-time stage monitoring addressed to flood forecasting. Proc., iEMSs 4th Biennial Meeting: Int. Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs 2008) 2008, 438-445. M. Sánchez-Marrè, J. Bèjar, J. Comas, A. E. Rizzoli, G. Guariso, and "." and eds., Int. Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Barcelona, Catalonia.
3. Chiu C.L. Application of entropy concept in open-channel flow study. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1991, 117(5):615-628. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:5(615), ".".
4. Chiu C.L. Tung N.C. Maximum velocity and regularities in open-channel flow. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2002, 128(4):390-398. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:4(390), and ".".
5. Chow V.T. Maidment D.R. Mays L.W. Applied hydrology 1988, and McGraw Hill, Columbus, OH.
6. Daluz Vieira J.H. Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint-Venant equations for shallow surface water flow. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 1983, 60(1):43-58. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90013-6, ".".
7. 2003, Danish Hydrological Institute (DHI), User's manual and technical references for MIKE 11 (Version 2003b), HOrsholm, Denmark.
8. Franchini M. Lamberti P. flood routing Muskingum type simulation and forecasting model based on level data alone. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30(7):2183-2196. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/94WR00536, and ".".
9. Franchini M. Lamberti P. Giammarco P.D. Rating curve estimation using local stages, upstream discharge data and simplified hydraulic model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1999, 3(4):541-548. HESSCF, 1027-5606, 10.5194/hess-3-541-1999, and ".".
10. Fread D.L. DAMBRK: The NWS dam-break flood forecasting model 1990, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Silver Spring, MD.
11. Keefer T.N. McQuivey R.S. Multiple linearization flow routing model. J. Hydraul. Div. 1974, 100(7):1031-1046. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X, and ".".
12. Kitanidis P.K. Bras R. Real time forecasting with conceptual hydrologic model. 2. Applications and results. Water Resour. Res. 1980, 16(6):1034-1044. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR016i006p01034, and ".".
13. Lamberti P. Pilati S. Flood propagation models for real time forecasting. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 1996, 175:239-266. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80013-8, and ".".
14. McCarthy G.T. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. Proc. Conf. of the North Atlantic Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1938, "." New London, CT.
15. Moramarco T. Barbetta S. Melone F. Singh V.P. Relating local stage and remote discharge with significant lateral inflow. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(1):58-69. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:1(58), and ".".
16. Moramarco T. Barbetta S. Melone F. Singh V.P. real-time stage Muskingum forecasting model for site without rating curve. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2006, 51(1):66-82. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1623/hysj.51.1.66, and ".".
17. Moramarco T. Pandolfo C. Singh V.P. Accuracy of kinematic wave and diffusion wave approximations for flood routing. I: Steady analysis. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(11):1078-1088. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:11(1078), and ".".
18. Moramarco T. Saltalippi C. Singh V.P. Estimation of mean velocity in natural channels based on Chiu's velocity distribution equation. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2004, 9(1):42-50. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:1(42), and ".".
19. Moramarco T. Singh V.P. Simple method for relating local stage and remote discharge. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2001, 6(1):78-81. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:1(78), and ".".
20. Moramarco T. Singh V.P. Accuracy of kinematic wave and diffusion wave for spatial-varying rainfall excess over plane. Hydrol. Processes 2002, 16:3419-3435. HYPRE3, 1099-1085, 10.1002/hyp.1108, and ".".
21. Moussa R. Bocquillon C. Criteria for the choice of flood routing methods in natural channels. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 1996, 186(1-4):1-30. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03045-4, and ".".
22. Nash J.E. Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 1970, 10(3):282-290. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, and ".".
23. O'Donnell T. direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1985, 30(4):479-496. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626668509491013, ".".
24. Perumal M. Moramarco T. Barbetta S. Melone F. Sahoo B. Real-time flood forecasting using Muskingum stage-hydrograph routing method. Water, Environment, Energy and Society, Proc. of WEES-2009 2009, 2:735-741. S. K. Jain, V. P. Singh, V. Kumar, R. Kumar, R. D. Singh, K. D. Sharma, and (b). "." and eds, Allied Publishers, New Delhi, India.
25. Perumal M. Moramarco T. Sahoo B. Barbetta S. methodology for discharge estimation and rating curve development at ungauged river sites. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W02412. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/2005WR004609, and ".".
26. Perumal M. Moramarco T. Sahoo B. Barbetta S. On the practical applicability of the VPMS routing method for rating curve development at ungauged river sites. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46:W03522. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/2009WR008103, and ".".
27. Perumal M. Sahoo B. Moramarco T. Barbetta S. Multilinear Muskingum method for stage-hydrograph routing in compound channels. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14(7):663-670. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000029, and (a). ".".
28. Ponce V.M. Li R.M. Simons D.B. Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models. J. Hydraul. Div. 1978, 104(3):353-360. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X, and ".".
29. Price R.K. An optimized routing model for flood forecasting. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W02426. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/2008WR007103, ".".
30. Reed D.W. review of British flood forecasting practise. 1984, "." Tech. Rep. No. 90, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
31. Romanowicz R.J. Young P.C. Beven K.J. Pappenberger F. data based mechanistic approach to nonlinear flood routing and adaptive flood level forecasting. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31(8):1048-1056. AWREDI, 0309-1708, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.015, and ".".
32. Singh V.P. Hydrologic systems: Vol. 1. Rainfall-runoff modeling 1988, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
33. Todini E. mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11(5):1645-1659. HESSCF, 1027-5606, 10.5194/hess-11-1645-2007, ".".
34. Todini E. Predictive uncertainty assessment in real time flood forecasting. Uncertainties in environmental modelling and consequences for policy making 2009, 205-228. P. C. Baveye, J. Mysiak, M. Laba, "." Chapter 4, and eds., Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
35. HEC-RAS river analysis system hydraulic reference manual, Version 3.1. 2002, U.S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), "." USACE-HEC, 609, Davis, CA.
36. Xia R. Relation between mean and maximum velocities in natural channel. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1997, 123(8):720-723. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:8(720), ".".