HIT on the psychometric approach

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 108-114

  Burnston, Daniel ^a   Sheredos, Benjamin ^a   Bechtel, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958714467     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.547387     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker, C. I., Hutchison, T. L., & Kanwisher, N. (2007). Does the fusiform face area contain subregions highly selective for nonfaces? Nature Neuroscience, 10(1), 3-4.
2. Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge.
3. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421-441.
4. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2010). Dynamic mechanistic explanation: Computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41, 321-333.
5. Bechtel, W., & McCauley, R. N. (1999). Heuristic identity theory (or back to the future): The mind-body problem against the background of research strategies in cognitive neuroscience. In M. Hahn&S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 67-72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bechtel, W., & Mundale, J. (1999). Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science, 66, 175-207.
7. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1993)
8. Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review, 97, 303-352.
9. Borsboom, D. (2008). Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective, 6(1), 25-53.
10. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203-219.
11. Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: What a science of the mind-brain could be. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547-563.
14. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
15. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495-504.
16. Glennan, S. (1996).Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44, 50-71.
17. Grill-Spector, K., Golarai, G., & Gabrieli, J. (2008). Developmental neuroimaging of the human ventral visual cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 152-162.
18. Grill-Spector, K., Sayres, R., & Ress, D. (2006). High-resolution imaging reveals highly selective nonface clusters in the fusiform face area. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1177-1185.
19. Haxby, J. V. (2006). Fine structure in representations of faces and objects. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1084-1086.
20. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759-763.
21. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
22. Kanwisher N. & Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2109-2128.
23. Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1-25.
24. Marr, D. C. (1982). Vision: A computation investigation into the human representational system and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
25. McCauley, R. N., & Bechtel, W. (2001). Explanatory pluralism and the heuristic identity theory. Theory and Psychology, 11, 736-760.
26. Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). The unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. Feigl&G. Maxwell (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp. 3-36). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
27. Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291-303.
28. Pitcher, D., Walsh, V., Yovel, G., & Duchaine, B. (2007). TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology, 17, 1568-1573.
29. Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological predicates. In W. H. Capitan & D. D. Merrill (Eds.), Art, mind and religion (pp. 37-48). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
30. Sejnowski, T. J.,& Paulsen, O. (2006).Network oscillations: Emerging computational principles. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1673-1676.
31. Tsao, D. Y., Moeller, S., & Freiwald, W. A. (2008). Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19514-19519.
32. Wada, Y., & Yamamoto, T. (2001). Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 71, 254-257.