The uses of narratology in social and policy studies

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-76

  Czarniawska, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Emplotment; Explanation; Explication; Exploration; Mimesis; Narrative turn; Narratology; Sensemaking; Storytelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958711356     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171003715002     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Atkinson, P., 1990. The ethnographic imagination. London: Routledge.
2. Bakhtin, M.M., Medvedev, P.N., 1985 [1928]. The formal method in literary scholarship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Barthes, R., 1977 [1966]. Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In: R. Barthes, Imagemusic-text. Glasgow: William Collins, 79-124.
4. Bartlett, F., 1977 [1932]. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Boje, D., 1991. The story-telling organization: a study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative science quarterly, 36, 106-126.
6. Boje, D., 2001. Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage.
7. Brown, R.H., 1977. A poetic for sociology: toward a logic of discovery for the human sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brown, R.H., 1989. Social science as civic discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9. Bruner, J., 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bruner, J., 1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Burke, K., 1969 [1932]. A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
12. Clark, B.R., 1972, The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative science quarterly, 17, 178-184.
13. Corvellec, H., 1997. Stories of achievement. Narrative features of organizational performance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
14. Czarniawska, B., 1999. Writing management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Czarniawska, B., 2002. Narrative, interviews and organizations. In: J.F. Gubrium and J. A Holstein, eds. Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 733-750.
16. Czarniawska, B., 2004a. Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.
17. Czarniawska, B., 2004b. On time, space and action nets. Organization, 11 (6). 777-795.
18. Czarniawska, B., and Gagliardi, P., eds, 2003. Narratives we organize by. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Derrida, J., 1987. The postcard. From Socrates to Freud and beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20. DeVault, M.L., 1990. Novel readings: the social organization of interpretation. American journal of sociology, 95 (4), 887-921.
21. Eco, U., 1983 [1979]. The role of the reader. London: Hutchinson.
22. Eco, U., 1990. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23. Eco, U., 1992. Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Fineman, S., ed., 1993. Emotions in organizations. London: Sage.
25. Fish, S., 1989. Doing what comes naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26. Fisher, W., 1984. Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Communication monographs, 51, 1-22.
27. Fisher, W.R., 1987. Human communication as narration. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
28. Frye, N., 1990 [1957]. The anatomy of criticism. London: Penguin Books.
29. Gabriel, Y., 2000. Storytelling in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Geertz, C., 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
31. Geertz, C., 1980. Negara: the theatre state in nineteenth century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Geertz, C., 1988. Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Greimas, A.J. and Courtés, J., 1982. Semiotics and language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
34. Harari, J.V., 1979. Critical factions/Critical fictions. In: J.V. Harari, ed. Textual strategies: perspectives in post-structuralist criticism. Ithaca, NY: Methuen, 17-72.
35. Hernadi, P., 1987. Literary interpretation and the rhetoric of the human sciences. In: J.S. Nelson, A. Megill and D.N. McCloskey, eds. The rhetoric of the human sciences. Wisconsin, MD: University of Wisconsin Press, 263-275.
36. Hirschman, A.O., 1992. Rival views of market society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Hirschman, A.O., 1997 [1977]. The passions and the interests. Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Hirschman, A.O., 2002 [1982]. Shifting involvements. Private interest and public action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F., 1997. Active interviewing. In: D. Silverman, ed. Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice. London: Sage, 113-129.
40. Hühn, P., 1987. The detective as reader. Modern fiction studies, 33 (3), 451-466.
41. Johnson, B., 1980. The critical difference: essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
42. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
43. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1994. Primitive classification and postmodernity. Theory, culture and society, 11, 1-22.
44. Kunda, G., 1992. Engineering culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
45. Labov, W., and Waletzky, J., 1967. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In: J. Helms, ed. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12-44.
46. Latour, B., 1988. The politics of explanation: an alternative. In: S. Woolgar, ed. Knowledge and reflexivity. London: Sage, 155-177.
47. Latour, B., 1992. The next turn after the social turn. In: E. McMullin, ed. The social dimensions of science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 272-292.
48. Latour, B., 1999. Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1986 [1979]. Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Lejeune, P., 1989. On autobiography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
51. Linde, C., 1993. Life stories. The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Lyotard, J.-F., 1986 [1979]. The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
53. MacIntyre, A., 1990 [1981]. After virtue. London: Duckworth Press.
54. Mangham, I.L. and Overington, M.A., 1987. Organizations as theatre. Chichester: Wiley.
55. Mansfield, J., 2005. Difference, deconstruction, undecidability: a Derridean interpretation. ACCESS: critical perspectives on communication, culture and policy studies, 24 (1/2), 33-43.
56. Marcus, G.E., 1992. Past, present and emergent identities: requirements for ethnographies of late twentieth-century modernity world-wide. In: S. Lash and J. Friedman, eds. Modernity and identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 309-330.
57. McCloskey, D.N., 1990a. If you're so smart. The narrative of economic expertise. Wisconsin, MD: The University of Wisconsin Press.
58. McCloskey, D.N., 1990b. Storytelling in economics. In: C. Nash, ed. Narrative in culture. London: Routledge, 5-22.
59. Mishler, E.G., 1986. Research interviewing. Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Nelson, J.S., 2008. Realism as political style: noir insights. Poroi, 5 (2), 1-46.
61. Norris, C., 1988. Deconstruction, post-modernism and visual arts. In: C. Norris and A. Benjamin, eds. What is deconstruction? London: Academy Editions, 7-55.
62. Orr, J.E., 1996. Talking about machines. An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63. Peters, M.A., 2007. The humanities in deconstruction: raising the question of the postcolonial university. ACCESS: critical perspectives on communication, culture & policy studies, 26 (1), 1-11.
64. Polkinghorne, D., 1987. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
65. Propp, V., 1928/1968. Morphology of the folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
66. Ricoeur, P., 1981. The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text. In: J.B. Thompson, ed. Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197-221.
67. Rorty, R., 1980. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
68. Rorty, R., 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Rorty, R., 1991. Inquiry as recontextualization: an anti-dualist account of interpretation. In: Objectivity, relativism and truth. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 93-110.
70. Ryan, M.-L., 1993. Narrative in real time: chronicle, mimesis and plot in baseball broadcast. Narrative, 1 (2), 138-155.
71. Sacks, H., 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Selden, R., 1985. A reader's guide to contemporary literary theory. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
73. Silverman, D. and Torode, B., 1980. The material word. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
74. Silvers, R.B., ed., 1995. Hidden histories of science. New York: NYRB.
75. Smith, D., 1987. The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Boston: Northern University Press.
76. Stern, J.P., 1973. On realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
77. Todorov, T., 1977 [1971]. The poetics of prose. Oxford: Blackwell.
78. Todorov, T., 1990 [1978]. Genres in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Van Fraassen, B.C. and Sigman, J., 1993. Interpretation in science and in the arts. In: G. Levine, ed. Realism and representation. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 73-99.
80. Van Maanen, J., 1988. Tales of the field. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
81. Weick, K.E., 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. White, H., 1973. Metahistory. The historical imagination in nineteenth century Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
83. White, H., 1987. The content of the form. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
84. White, H., 1999. Figural realism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.