Tangent bundle for human action recognition

2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition and Workshops, FG 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 97-102

  Lui, Yui Man ^a   Beveridge, J Ross ^a  

^a Colorado State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMBRIDGE; DATA SETS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; GRASSMANN MANIFOLD; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN-ACTION RECOGNITION; INTRINSIC DISTANCES; RECOGNITION RATES; TANGENT SPACE; TANGENT VECTORS; THIRD-ORDER TENSORS;

FACE RECOGNITION; MOTION ESTIMATION;

GESTURE RECOGNITION;

EID: 79958708443     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FG.2011.5771378     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, and R. Sepulchre. Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds. Princeton University Press, 2008.
2. G. Ben-Yosef and O. Ben-Shahar. Minimum length in the tangent bundle as a model for curve completion. In CVPR, San Francisco, 2010.
3. M. Bregonzio, J. Li, S. Gong, and T. Xiang. Discriminative topics modelling for action feature selection and recognition. In BMVC, 2010.
4. J. Conway, R. Hardin, and N. Sloane. Packing lines, planes, etc.: Packings in grassmannian spaces. Experimental Mathematics, 5(2):139-159, 1996. (Pubitemid 126138680)
5. D. W. Dreisigmeyer. Direct search algorithms over riemannian manifolds, 2007. Optimization Online.
6. A. Edelman, R. Arias, and S. Smith. The geometry of algorithms with orthogonal constraints. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., (2):303-353, 1999.
7. S. Gudmundsson and E. Kappos. On the geometry of tangent bundles. Expositiones Mathematicae, 20:1-41, 2001.
8. D. Kendall. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. London Math. Soc., 16:81-121, 1984.
9. T.-K. Kim and R. Cipolla. Gesture recognition under small sample size. In ACCV, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
10. T.-K. Kim and R. Cipolla. Canonical correlation analysis of video volume tensors for action categorization and detection. PAMI, 31(8):1415-1428, 2009.
11. A. Kovashka and K. Grauman. Learning a hierarchy of discriminative space-time neighborhood features for human action recognition. In CVPR, San Francisco, 2010.
12. I. Laptev, M. Marszalek, C. Schmid, and B. Rozenfield. Learning realistic human actions from movies. In CVPR, Alaska, 2008.
13. R. Li and R. Chellappa. Aligning spatio-temporal signals on a special manifold. In ECCV, Crete, Greece, 2010.
14. Z. Lin, Z. Jiang, and L. Davis. Recognizing actions by shape-motion prototype trees. In ICCV, Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
15. Y. M. Lui, J. R. Beveridge, and M. Kirby. Canonical stiefel quotient and its application to generic face recognition in illumination spaces. In BTAS, Washington, D.C., 2009.
16. Y. M. Lui, J. R. Beveridge, and M. Kirby. Action classification on product manifolds. In CVPR, San Francisco, 2010.
17. J. Niebles, H. Wang, and L. Fei-Fei. Unsupervised learning of human action categories using spatial-temporal words. IJCV, 79(3):299-318, 2008.
18. R. Poppe. A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image and Vision Computing, (6):976-990, 2010.
19. M. Rodriguez, J. Ahmed, and M. Shah. Action mach: A spatiotemporal maximum average correlation height filter for action recognition. In CVPR, Alaska, 2008.
20. C. Scḧuldt, I. Laptev, and B. Caputo. Recognizing human actions: A local svm approach. In ICPR, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
21. J. Silva, J. Marques, and J. Lemos. Non-linear dimension reduction with tangent bundle approximation. In ICASSP, Philadelphia, 2005.
22. A. Veeraraghavan, A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, and R. Chellappa. Matching shape sequences in video with applications in human movement analysis. PAMI, (12):1896-1909, 2005. (Pubitemid 43051387)
23. H. Wang, M. Ullah, A. Klaser, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. Evaulation of local spatio-temporal features for action recognition. In BMVC, 2009.
24. L. Yeffet and L. Wolf. Local trinary patterns for human action recognition. In ICCV, Kyoto, Japan, 2009.