Image fusion for land cover change detection

International Journal of Image and Data Fusion

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 193-215

  Zeng, Yu ^a   Zhang, Jixian ^a   van Genderen, J L ^b   Zhang, Yun ^c  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SURVEYING AND MAPPING   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fractal; Grey level co occurrence matrix; Hard decision; Soft decision; Texture analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958705625     PISSN: 19479832     EISSN: 19479824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19479831003802832     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benz, U.C., et al., 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58 (3/4), 239-258.
2. Bo, Y. and Wang, J., 2003. Uncertainty in remote sensing. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.
3. Chaudhuri, B.B. and Sarkar, N., 1995. Texture segmentation using fractal dimension. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17 (1), 72-77.
4. Chavez, P.S., Berlin, G.L., and Sowers, L.B., 1982. Statistical methods for selecting Landsat MSS ratios. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 8 (1), 23-30.
5. Clausi, D.A., 2000. Comparison and fusion of co-occurrence, Gabor and MRF texture features for classification of SAR sea-ice imagery. Atmosphere-Ocean, 39 (3), 183-194.
6. Clausi, D.A. and Yue, B., 2004. Comparing co-occurrence probabilities and Markov random fields for texture analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 42 (1), 215-228.
7. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G., 2001. Pattern classification. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
8. eCognition 4.0 User Guide, 2002. Definiens Imaging GMBH, Germany.
9. ERDAS Field Guide, 2005. Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, USA.
10. Foody, G.M., et al., 1992. Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58 (10), 1335-1341.
11. Franklin, S.E., 2001. Remote sensing for sustainable forest management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
12. Fuller, R.M., Smith, G.M., and Deveraux, B.J., 2003. The characterization and measurement of land cover change through remote sensing: problems in operational applications? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4 (3), 243-253.
13. Gallego, F.J., 2004. Remote sensing and land cover area estimation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (15), 3019-3047.
14. Goodchild, M.F., Sun, G.Q., and Yang, S.R., 1992. Development and test of an error model for categorical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 6 (2), 87-104.
15. Guo, H.D., 2000. Theories and applications of radar systems for earth observation. Beijing: Science Publisher.
16. Hall, D.L., 1992. Mathematical techniques in multisensor data fusion. Norwood: Artech House Inc.
17. Khorram, S., et al., 1999. Accuracy assessment of remote sensing-derived change detection. USA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
18. Maillard, P., 2003. Comparing texture analysis methods through classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69 (4), 357-367.
19. Pohl, C. and van Genderen, J.L., 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19 (5), 823-854.
20. Shi, W.Z. and Ehlers, M., 1996. Determining uncertainties and their propagation in dynamic change detection based on classified remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17 (14), 2729-2741.
21. Soh, L.K. and Tsatsoulis, C., 1999. Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using grey level co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37 (2), 780-794.
22. Tuceryan, M. and Jain, A.K., 1993. Handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. Singapore: World Scientific.
23. Xu, L. and Krzyzak, A., 1992. Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems of Man and Cybernetics, 22 (3), 418-435.