Wanted: An appropriate evaluation template

BMJ

Volumn 342, Issue 7810, 2011, Pages

  McCulloch, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVICE APPROVAL; DEVICE SAFETY; LETTER; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EUROPEAN UNION; EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EUROPEAN UNION; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79958701834     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3540     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Cohen D, Billingsley M. Europeans are left to their own devices. BMJ 2011;342:d2748 (14 May.)
2. Lenzer J, Brownlee S. Why the FDA can't protect the public. BMJ 2010;341:c4753.
3. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al; for the Balliol Collaboration. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105-12.
4. Freemantle N. Evaluating and regulating device therapy. BMJ 2011;342:d2839. (14 May.)
5. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, et al; for the Balliol Collaboration. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009;374:1097-104.