Assessing the scientific and technological output of EU Framework Programmes: evidence from the FP6 projects in the ICT field

Scientometrics

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 239-257

  Breschi, Stefano ^a   Malerba, Franco ^a  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Framework Programme; Research consortia; Scientific and technological performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958695204     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0378-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating research and innovation policy: A systems world needs systems evaluations. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3-17.
2. Arnold, E., Clark, J., & Muscio, A. (2005). What the evaluation record tells us about Framework Programme performance. Science and Public Policy, 32, 385-397.
3. Arnold Report. (2009). Evaluation of the Sixth Framework Programmes for research and development 2002-2006. Bruxelles: European Commission.
4. Butler, L. (2008). ICT assessment: Moving beyond journal outputs. Scientometrics, 74(1), 39-55.
5. Delanghe, H., Muldur, U., & Soete, L. (2009). European science and technology policy. Towards integration or fragmentation?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6. Drott, M. C. (1999). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299-305.
7. EPEC. (2009a). Assessment of the impact of the new instruments introduced in FP6. A study for the European Commission Research Directorate General. Bruxelles: European Commission.
8. EPEC. (2009b). Bibliometric profiling of Framework Programme participants. A study for the European Commission Budget Directorate General. Bruxelles: European Commission.
9. European Commission. (2000). Towards a European research area. Bruxelles: European Commission.
10. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457-473.
11. Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
12. Greene, W. H. (2008). Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters, 99(3), 585-590.
13. Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776-1784.
14. Marimon Report. (2004). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the new instruments of Frame-work Programme VI. Bruxelles: European Commission. http://cordis. europa. eu/fp6/instruments_review/.
15. Vanecek, J., Fatun, M., & Albrecht, V. (2010). Bibliometric evaluation of the FP-5 and FP-6 results in the Czech Republic. Scientometrics, 83(1), 103-114.
16. Vonortas, N. (2008). FP6 participation. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
17. Winkelmann, R., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1995). Recent developments in count data modelling: Theory and application. Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(1), 1-24.