Modelled impact of Norway spruce logging residue extraction on biodiversity in Sweden

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1220-1232

  Dahlberg, Anders ^a   Thor, Göran ^a   Allmér, Johan ^a   Jonsell, Mats ^a   Jonsson, Mattias ^a   Ranius, Thomas ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIO-ENERGY; COMBINED MODELING; CURRENT SITUATION; EXTINCTION RISKS; FINE WOODY DEBRIS; FOREST ROTATION; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; LOGGING RESIDUES; MANAGED FOREST; NORWAY SPRUCE; PICEA ABIES (L.) KARST; WOODY DEBRIS;

BIODIVERSITY; DEBRIS; FORESTRY; FUNGI;

SUBSTRATES;

BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOENERGY; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVERGREEN TREE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; LICHEN; LOGGING (TIMBER); NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK FACTOR; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WOODY DEBRIS;

BIODIVERSITY; EXTRACTION; FIBER DEBRIS; FORESTRY; FUNGI; LOGGING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PICEA ABIES; SUBSTRATES; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

BASIDIOMYCOTA; COLEOPTERA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 79958287858     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: 12086037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x11-034     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ågren, G.I., and Hyvönen, R. 2003. Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model. For. Ecol. Manag. 174(1-3): 25-37. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02) 00025-7.
2. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, L. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169-211.
3. Allmér, J., Stenlid, J., and Dahlberg, A. 2009. Logging residue extraction does not reduce the diversity of litter-layer saprotrophic fungi in three Swedish coniferous stands after 25 years. Can. J. For. Res. 39(9): 1737-1748. doi:10.1139/X09-096.
4. Anonymous. 2007. IEA Bioenergy Report Finland. IEA Bioenergy Task 31-country reports [online]. Available from www.ieabioenergytask31.org/iea-bioenergy-task-31/IEA-Country%20report-Finland.pdf [accessed 7 November 2010].
5. Anonymous. 2010. The Saproxylic database [online]. Available from www.saproxylic.org/ [accessed 7 November 2010].
6. Åström, M., Dynesius, M., Hylander, K., and Nilsson, C. 2005. Effects of slash harvest on bryophytes and vascular plants in southern boreal forest clear-cuts. J. Appl. Ecol. 42(6): 1194-1202. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01087.x.
7. Bradley, D. 2009. Canada report on Bioenergy 2009 [online]. Available from http://www.canbio.ca/documents/publications/canadacountryreport2009.pdf [accessed 7 November 2010].
8. Caruso, A., Rudolphi, J., and Thor, G. 2008. Lichen species diversity and substrate amounts in young planted boreal forests: a comparison between slash and stumps of Picea abies. Biol. Conserv. 141(1): 47-55. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.021.
9. Dahlberg, A., and Stokland, J.N. 2004. Vedlevande arters krav påsubstrat-sammanställning och analys av 3600 arter [Substrate requirements of wood-inhibiting species-a compilation and analysis of 3600 species]. [Summary in English.] Report 7. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping.
10. Egnell, G., Dahlberg, A., Westling, O., and Berg, J. 2006. Miljöeffekter av skogsbränsleuttag och askåterföring i Sverige. En syntes av Energimyndighetens forskningsprogram 1997 till 2004 [Environmental effects of forest biofuel extractions and wood ash recycling. A synthesis of the Swedish Energy Agency's research program 1997-2004]. [Summary in English.] ER2006 44. Swedish Energy Agency, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
11. Ehnström, B., and Axelsson, R. 2002. Insekters gnag i bark och ved [Galleries and exit holes of saproxylic insects]. [Summary in English.] ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
12. Ekbom, B., Schroeder, M., and Larsson, S. 2006. Stand specific occurrence of coarse woody debris in a managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 221(1-3): 2-12. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.038.
13. Eräjää, S., Halme, P., Kotiaho, J.S., Markkanen, A., and Toivanen, T. 2010. The volume and composition of dead wood on traditional and forest fuel harvested clear-cuts. Silva Fenn. 44: 203-211.
14. Eriksson, H. 1976. Granens produktion i Sverige [The production of Norway spruce in Swedish].[ In Swedish.] Rapporter och uppsatser nr 41. Skogshögskolan, Stockholm, Sweden.
15. Eriksson, J., Hjortstam, K., and Ryvarden, L. 1973-1984. The Corticiaceae of northern Europe. pp. 2-7. Fungi Flora, Oslo, Norway.
16. Foucard, T. 2001. Svenska skorplavar [Swedish crustose lichens]. [In Swedish]. Interpublishing, Stockholm, Sweden.
17. Fridman, J., and Walheim, M. 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 131(1-3): 23-36. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99) 00208-X.
18. Fridman, J., Kempe, G., Lidström, P., and Toet, H. 1992. Skogsdata 92. Aktuella uppgifter om de svenska skogarna från riksskogstaxeringen. Institutionen för skogstaxering. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå. [In Swedish.]
19. Gan, J., and Smith, C.T. 2006. Availability of logging residues and potential for electricity production and carbon displacement in the USA. Biomass Bioenergy, 30(12): 1011-1020. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.013.
20. Gärdenfors, U. (Editor). 2010. The 2010 red list of Swedish species. Art Databanken, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
21. Hansen, V. 1964. Fortegnelse over Danmarks biller 1. og 2. del. [Catalogue of the Coleoptera of Denmark parts 1 and 2 part]. Entomol. Medd. 33: 1-507.
22. Hautala, H., Jalonen, J., Laaka-Lindberg, S., and Vanha-Majamaa, I. 2004. Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland. Biodiversity Conserv. 13(8): 1541-1554. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000021327.43783.a9.
23. Hyvönen, R., Olsson, B.A., Lundkvist, H., and Staaf, H. 2000. Decomposition and nutrient release from Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. logging residues. For. Ecol. Manag. 126(2): 97-112. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00092-4.
24. Jonsell, M. 2008a. Saproxylic beetle species in logging residues: which are they and which residues do they use? Norw. J. Entomol. 55: 109-122.
25. Jonsell, M. 2008b. The effect of biofuel harvest on biodiversity. In Sustainable use of forest biomass for energy-a synthesis with focus on the Baltic and Nordic Region. Edited by D. Röser, A. Asikainen, K. Raulund-Rasmussen, and I. Stupak Møller. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 129-154.
26. Jonsell, M., Weslien, J., and Ehnström, B. 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity Conserv. 7(6): 749-764. doi:10.1023/A:1008888319031.
27. Jonsell, M., Hansson, J., and Wedmo, L. 2007. Diversity of saproxylic beetle species in logging residues in Sweden-comparisons between tree species and diameters. Biol. Conserv. 138(1-2): 89-99. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.003.
28. Jonsson, B.G., Kruys, N., and Ranius, T. 2005. Ecology of species living on dead wood-lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn. 39: 289-309.
29. Koch, K. 1989-1992. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Ökologie. Band 1-3.
30. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld. Krankina, O.N., and Harmon, M.E. 1995. Dynamics of dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut. 82(1-2): 227-238. doi:10.1007/BF01182836.
31. Kruys, N., and Jonsson, B.G. 1999. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of northern Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 29(8): 1295-1299. doi:10.1139/cjfr-29-8-1295.
32. Lattimore, B., Smith, C.T., Titus, B.D., Stupak, I., and Egnell, G. 2009. Environmental factors in wood fuel production: opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass Bioenergy, 33(10): 1321-1342. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe. 2009.06.005.
33. Levin, R., and Eriksson, H. 2010. Good-practice guidelines for whole-tree harvesting in Sweden: moving science into policy. For. Chron. 86: 51-56.
34. Lindbladh, M., and Foster, R.F. 2010. Dynamics of long-lived foundation species: the history of Quercus in southern Scandinavia. J. Ecol. 98(6): 1330-1345. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010. 01733.x.
35. Lundberg, S., and Gustafsson, B. 1995. Catalogus Coleopterorum Sueciae. Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden.
36. Manak, V. 2007. Saproxylic beetles in two types of fine woody debris of Norway spruce. M.Sc. thesis 2007:2, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
37. Marklund, L.G. 1988. Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk I Sverige [Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden]. Report 45. SLU, Institutionen för skogstaxering, Umeå, Sweden.
38. Niemelä, T., Renvall, P., and Pentillä, R. 1995. Interactions of fungi at late stages of wood decomposition. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 32: 141-152.
39. Nittérus, K., Åström, M., and Gunnarsson, B. 2007. Commercial harvest of logging residue in clear-cuts affects the diversity and community composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Scand. J. For. Res. 22(3): 231-240. doi:10.1080/02827580701352955.
40. Palm, T. 1959. Die Holz-und Rindenkäfer der süd-und mittelschwedischen Laubbäume. Opusc. Entom. 16(Suppl): 1-374.
41. Petersson, H., and Ståhl, G. 2006. Functions for below-ground biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 21(1 Suppl. 7): 84-93. doi:10.1080/14004080500486864.
42. Ranius, T., Kindvall, O., Kruys, N., and Jonsson, B.G. 2003. Modelling dead wood in Norway spruce stands subject to different management regimes. For. Ecol. Manag. 182(1-3): 13-29. doi:10. 1016/S0378-1127(03)00027-6.
43. Ranius, T., Jonsson, B.G., and Kruys, N. 2004. Modeling dead wood in Fennoscandian old-growth forests dominated by Norway spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 34(5): 1025-1034. doi:10.1139/x03-271.
44. Ranius, T., Ekvall, H., Jonsson, M., and Bostedt, G. 2005. Costefficiency of measures to increase the amount of coarse woody debris in managed Norway spruce forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 206 (1-3): 119-133. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.061.
45. Rassi, P., Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., and Mannerkoski, I. (Editors). 2010. The 2010 red list of Finnish species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Available from www.environment.fi/redlist [Aacessed 2 January 2011].
46. Rudolphi, J., and Gustafsson, L. 2005. Effects of forest-fuel harvesting on the amount of deadwood on clearcuts. Scand. J. For. Res. 20(3): 235-242. doi:10.1080/02827580510036201.
47. Ryvarden, L., and Gilbertson, R.L. 1993-1994. European polypores. Parts 1 and 2. Fungi Flora, Oslo, Norway.
48. Santesson, R., Moberg, R., Nordin, A., Tønsberg, T., and Vitikainen, O. 2004. Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandia. Museum of evolution. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
49. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
50. Siitonen, J., and Saaristo, L. 2000. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol. Conserv. 94(2): 211-220. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00174-3.
51. Sillerström, E. 1985. Grundbok för skogsbrukare. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping.
52. Storaunet, K.O., and Rolstad, J. 2002. Time since death and fall of Norway spruce logs in old-growth and selectively cut boreal forest. Can. J. For. Res. 32(10): 1801-1812. doi:10.1139/x02-105.
53. Swedish Forest Agency. 2008. Recommendations for the extraction of forest fuel and compensation fertilizing. Meddelande, 2008: 2. [In Swedish.]
54. Swedish Forest Agency. 2010. Statistical yearbook of forestry 2010 [online]. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. Available from www.saproxylic.org/ [accessed 7 November 2010].
55. Swedish National Forest Inventory. 2008. Online. Available from www.slu.se/riksskogstaxeringen [accessed 7 November 2010].