Segmentation of the quadratus lumborum muscle using statistical shape modeling

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1422-1429

  Engstrom, Craig M ^a   Fripp, Jurgen ^b   Jurcak, Valer ^a   Walker, Duncan G ^c   Salvado, Olivier ^b   Crozier, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c WESLEY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

atlas creation; automated segmentation; image registration procedures; quadratus lumborum muscle; statistical shape modeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRATUS LUMBORUM MUSCLE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPORT; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ATHLETES; AUTOMATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79958255154     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22188     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bartlett R, Stockhill N, Elliott B, Burnett A,. The biomechanics of fast bowling in men's cricket: a review. J Sports Sci 1996: 403-424. (Pubitemid 26387827)
2. Engstrom C, Walker D, Kippers V, Mehnert A,. Quadratus lumborum asymmetry and L4 pars injury in fast bowlers: a prospective MR study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 910-917. (Pubitemid 46883460)
3. Hides J, Stanton W, Freke M, Wilson S, McMahon S, Richardson CA,. MRI study of the size, symmetry and function of the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with and without low back pain. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 809-813.
4. Trappe S, Costill D, Gallagher P, et al. Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 1159-1168.
5. Hides JA, Fan T, Stanton WR, Stanton P, McMahon K, Wilson S,. Psoas and quadratus lumborum muscle asymmetry among elite Australian football league players. Br J Sports Med 2009 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009. 058909.
6. Tesch PA, Ekberg A., Lindquist DM, Trieschmann JT,. Muscle hypertrophy following 5-week resistance training using a non-gravity-dependent exercise system. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 180: 89-98. (Pubitemid 38175070)
7. Wacker J, Calder J, Engstrom C, Saxby TS,. MR morphometry of posterior tibialis muscle in adult acquired flat foot. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 354-357. (Pubitemid 36457312)
8. Agur AMR, Lee MJ,. Grant's atlas of anatomy, 10th ed., Lee M, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
9. Jurcak V, Fripp J, Engstrom C, et al. Atlas based automated segmentation of the quadratus lumborum muscle using non-rigid registration on magnetic resonance images of the thoracolumbar region. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, May 2008. p 113-116.
10. Jurcak V, Fripp J, Engstrom C, et al, Automated segmentation of the quadratus lumborum muscle from magnetic resonance images using a hybrid atlas based geodesic active contour scheme. In: 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Aug 2008. p 867-870.
11. Cootes T, Taylor C, Cooper D, Graham J,. Active shape models - their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 1995; 61: 38-59.
12. Salvado O, Hillenbrand C, Zhang S, Wilson D,. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 539-552.
13. Salvado O, Hillenbrand CM, Wilson DL,. Partial volume reduction by interpolation with reverse diffusion. Int J Biomed Imaging 2006; 092: 1-13.
14. Ourselin S, Roche A, Subsol G, Pennec X, Ayache N,. Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections. Image Vis Comput 2001; 19: 25-31. (Pubitemid 32033991)
15. Rueckert D, Sonoda L, Hayes C, Hill D, Leach M, Hawkes D,. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18: 712-721. (Pubitemid 32262025)
16. Rohlfing T, Brandt R, Menzel R, Maurer C,. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 2004; 21: 1428-1442. (Pubitemid 38446569)
17. Davies R, Twining C, Cootes T, Waterton J, Taylor C,. 3D statistical shape models using direct optimisation of description length. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision, Denmark, May 2002. p 3-20.
18. Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield S, Ourselin S,. Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 1617-1631. (Pubitemid 46646370)
19. Dice L,. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945; 26: 297-302.
20. Crum W, Camara O, Hill D,. Generalized overlap measures for evaluation and validation in medical image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 1451-1461. (Pubitemid 44711693)
21. Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M,. Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. In: 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention October 2001. p 516-523. (Pubitemid 33352451)