Current status and perspectives of mucogingival soft tissue measurement methods

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 146-156

  Ronay, Valerie ^a   Sahrmann, Philipp ^a   Bindl, Andreas ^a   Attin, Thomas ^a   Schmidlin, Patrick R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; ECHOGRAPHY; GINGIVA; GINGIVA DISEASE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; LASER; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTICS; PHENOTYPE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTICS; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79958248042     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00424.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Müller HP, Eger T,. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 65-71.
2. Schröder HE,. The periodontium. In:, Oksche A, Vollrath L, editors. Handbook of microscopic anatomy. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer; 1986, pp. 233-47.
3. Ochsenbein C, Ross S,. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969; 13: 87-102.
4. Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008.
5. Olsson M, Lindhe J,. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18: 78-82.
6. Eger T, Muller HP, Heinecke A,. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 839-45. (Pubitemid 126732046)
7. Müller HP, Eger T,. Masticatory mucosa and periodontal phenotype: a review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 172-83.
8. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, et al,. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1128-32.
9. Chang M, Wennstrom JL, Odman P, Andersson B,. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 185-94.
10. Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP,. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 570-7.
11. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC,. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 557-62. (Pubitemid 36553395)
12. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al,. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 428-33.
13. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al,. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 639-44. (Pubitemid 43951426)
14. Weinländer M, Lekovic V, Spadijer-Gostovic S, et al,. Gingivomorphometry-esthetic evaluation of the crown-mucogingival complex: a new method for collection and measurement of standardized and reproducible data in oral photography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 526-30.
15. Ricci A,. An objective method to measure soft tissue behavior around single-tooth implants. Part 1: vertical measurements. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2: 434-46.
16. Jemt T,. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 326-33.
17. Nordland WP, Tarnow DP,. A classification system for loss of papillary height. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 1124-6. (Pubitemid 128523623)
18. Cardaropoli D, Re S, Corrente G,. The Papilla Presence Index (PPI): a new system to assess interproximal papillary levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 488-92. (Pubitemid 39297230)
19. Alpiste-Illueca F,. Dimensions of the dentogingival unit in maxillary anterior teeth: a new exploration technique (parallel profile radiograph). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 386-96. (Pubitemid 39090728)
20. Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, et al,. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1407-12. (Pubitemid 32998718)
21. Savitha B, Vandana KL,. Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method. Indian J Dent Res 2005; 16: 135-9.
22. Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A,. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 145-51. (Pubitemid 127518257)
23. Ursell MJ,. Relationships between alveolar bone levels measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16: 81-6.
24. Tsiolis FI, Needleman IG, Griffiths GS,. Periodontal ultrasonography. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 849-54. (Pubitemid 38019376)
25. Goaslind GD, Robertson PB, Mahan CJ, et al,. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol 1977; 48: 768-71. (Pubitemid 8254481)
26. Januario AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR,. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 366-73; discussion 374.
27. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januario AL, et al,. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 564-8.
28. Studer SP, Lehner C, Bucher A, Scharer P,. Soft tissue correction of a single-tooth pontic space: a comparative quantitative volume assessment. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 402-11.
29. Studer SP, Sourlier D, Wegmann U, et al,. Quantitative measurement of volume changes induced by oral plastic surgery: validation of an optical method using different geometrically-formed specimens. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 950-62. (Pubitemid 127517478)
30. Rosin M, Splieth C, Hessler M, et al,. Quantification of gingival edema using a new 3-D laser scanning method. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 240-6. (Pubitemid 41697860)
31. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R,. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-807. (Pubitemid 127732204)
32. Thomason JM, Ellis JS, Jovanovski V, et al,. Analysis of changes in gingival contour from three-dimensional co-ordinate data in subjects with drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 1069-75. (Pubitemid 41397991)
33. Jemt T, Lekholm U,. Measurements of buccal tissue volumes at single-implant restorations after local bone grafting in maxillas: a 3-year clinical prospective study case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 63-70. (Pubitemid 37158036)
34. Jemt T, Lekholm U,. Single implants and buccal bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: measurements of buccal crestal contours in a 6-year prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 127-35. (Pubitemid 41551721)
35. Henriksson K, Jemt T,. Measurements of soft tissue volume in association with single-implant restorations: a 1-year comparative study after abutment connection surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 181-9. (Pubitemid 40179314)
36. Wälivaara DA, Isaksson S, Rosen S,. Description of a technique for evaluation of three-dimensional shape alterations in soft tissue after intra oral bone reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45: 382-6. (Pubitemid 46780184)
37. Mörmann WH, Bindl A,. All-ceramic, chair-side computer-aided design/computer-aided machining restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 405-26.
38. Windisch SI, Jung RE, Sailer I, et al,. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 545-51.
39. Strebel J, Ender A, Paque F, et al,. In vivo validation of a three-dimensional optical method to document volumetric soft tissue changes of the interdental papilla. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 56-61.
40. Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, et al,. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 442-8.
41. Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, et al,. 3D X-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 29-40.
42. Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Kononen E,. Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 439-42.
43. Meyer BJ, Mörmann WH, Lutz F,. Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environment-friendly propellant systems [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 1462-8.